CatsRinternet t1_j6koavf wrote
So brain damage can cause the brain to not work well later on?
Strict_Geologist_603 t1_j6krx46 wrote
Why is it that every post on r/science has at least one snarky comment like this from someone who probably didn't bother opening the article?
awkto t1_j6ksqfl wrote
You do know you are on reddit right?
[deleted] t1_j6ksta4 wrote
[removed]
TheThirdStrike t1_j6kv1n5 wrote
It's the internet.. someone will try to get imaginary points for being "witty" no matter what.
NobodyLikesMeAnymore t1_j6l3eok wrote
That's what she said.
AintAintAWord t1_j6kuv9w wrote
And I can guarantee none of the users making the same tired comment even read the article, let alone the study included.
Girafferage t1_j6l56bk wrote
Tom is that you?
[deleted] t1_j6lcqxi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6n14kj wrote
[removed]
FUNNY_NAME_ALL_CAPS t1_j6m960k wrote
Having read the article, his comment still holds.
Strict_Geologist_603 t1_j6mqz6w wrote
Yes, sometimes studies have findings that sound obvious when you condense them down to a headline. There's still value in testing and quantifying things
FUNNY_NAME_ALL_CAPS t1_j6mt5po wrote
Nothing wrong with pointing out the finding is commonsensical.
[deleted] t1_j6koy62 wrote
[removed]
SnooPuppers1978 t1_j6n1esl wrote
Not necessarily. Brain not working well could cause concussions to happen due to different risk evaluation.
That's why the used the word "may". They wouldn't know for sure which way the causation is.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments