Recent comments in /f/science

ChemicalRain5513 t1_j6sypga wrote

Some people think that because of this it is morally worse if women die than men. E.g. when Russia commits terrorist attacks in Ukraine, it is stressed more if women died in the attack.

4

StormlitRadiance t1_j6sxoar wrote

Males are less important. You can lose one male and it has no impact on the next generation, because it's easy for the other males pick up the slack.

If one female dies, that's a whole litter of pups that are missing from the next generation.

43

Jr05s t1_j6sv5i4 wrote

1

real_bk3k t1_j6sulk1 wrote

8

linkdude212 t1_j6su204 wrote

Then they should use "terrestrial". Using "Earth" creates expectations in people's minds that are far beyond anything meant by "super-Earth" and leads to broad misunderstanding of the science. Look no further than the word "theory" for how damaging this can be.

2

vrfanservice t1_j6sswj3 wrote

So bad air makes people feel bad and potentially do bad things, sounds about right.

I have this weird theory that native Hawaiians had an understanding of pollutants and microbes as they referred to the first European visitors as haole, which translates to “without breath” and the concept of “breath” is like a universal life force and aloha translates like “sharing breath”.

So I imagine when native Hawaiians, who practiced sanitation and hygiene, saw visitors come off of a boat that was cramped, dark, dirty, and with poor sanitation, they inherently know that these sailors were covered in and breathing bad air/life force.

13

popkornking t1_j6sqio5 wrote

When talking about heat deaths wouldn't it be more relevant to talk about how much tree coverage changes the peak temperatures? The average temperature is irrelevant because people aren't dying from being at 21.4 C rather than 21 C on average.

5

vibesWithTrash t1_j6sq1kc wrote

i think it would be fine for industry and workplaces where you barely see sunlight anyway, but for mental health reasons building housing underground is a terrible idea yeah

2

9273629397759992 OP t1_j6sp6ka wrote

Plain language summary:

This study found that long-term exposure to air pollution may increase the risk of developing depression and anxiety. The study looked at nearly 400,000 people in the U.K. and found that exposure to PM2.5, NO2, and NO was associated with higher risk for depression and anxiety. Even at relatively low levels of exposure, all three pollutants were linked to depression and anxiety. The risks for depression and anxiety were higher in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of exposure compared to the lowest quartile. The authors suggest that air pollution may increase mental health issues by causing inflammation and oxidative stress in the central nervous system.

36

AutoModerator t1_j6sowvp wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Defenestratio t1_j6so2jb wrote

That joke unfortunately falls flat on the yanks, they don't have the same connotation of "rooting". There's a plumbing business called roto rooters in the states, gives me a good chuckle every time I see once of their trucks. Along with the "coït cleaners" from SF

11

Huntguy t1_j6sm428 wrote

22