Recent comments in /f/science

AutoModerator t1_j7fy2a6 wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

MaxParedes t1_j7fxkyu wrote

Yes, a couple important passages from the study that dovetail with what you're saying:

However, the findings from this cohort study do not prove causation. Screen time likely represents a measurable contextual characteristic of a family or a proxy for the quality of parent-child interaction.

and:

Screen time at 12 months of age was reported by parents and not an objective measure. At that point, precise recording of screen use via moment-to-moment capture and machine learning, now referred to as screenome, was still in development. Time spent on each type of electronic device was also not collected. In 2010, handheld devices were beginning to surface in Singapore, and 97% of families were using television alone as the main source of screen time.

Along with the correlation/causation question, the use of self-reporting does seems like another reason for caution with the results. I wonder if there's data on whether parents accurately report things like this (especially sleep-deprived parents of infants!).

4

LanghamP_ t1_j7fxjwg wrote

I accidentally found that talking about how we can use drones as pollinators for commercial crops works surprisingly well. We've killed off most of the bees in North America via commercial crops and lawns that using drones to pollinate our portions of our crops will almost certainly be necessary in our near future.

9

Rakshear t1_j7ftdd0 wrote

212

sorenflying t1_j7fqb0q wrote

CRISPR was literally discovered in random bacteria, you can’t just not look at anything that has promising leads. Grant funded research requires you to apply for this money and preliminary data is given as reasoning for why the researcher should be funded for what they are interested in looking at, so this could have had very promising preliminary data for them to even get this far. Also not every treatment works for every single person, if CRISPR ever becomes a widespread treatment option it doesn’t guarantee that it works for every single person, immunotherapy has this very issue.

Source: Am a PhD candidate in a renowned cancer immunology lab

7