Ehhh it’s all the same at the end of the day

[removed]

Sounds like you need to leave, that doesn't sound healthy for either of you

Sure. But you aren't supposed to live with the clients.

The only 100% deal breakers are if both parties aren't committed to the relationship. Anything else can be worked through in theory, although basically everyone will draw the line at giving up major life goals or compromising core values.

And it's not always men with the higher libido too. Something a lot of people might not realize if they're used to the outdated ideas that men always want sex.

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

The only way I'd spend big on a wedding or ring is if someone were gifting those things to me. Ain't no way in hell I'd pay thousands out of my own pocket for something that could be better spent building our lives together.

I’m in a relationship with a truly traditional person who doesn’t want to work, needs to have 2 kids because her friends do, and expects me to provide everything, like a house. In this economy?!

My money is our money, but her money is her money.

There’s no sex. There’s no communication. Plenty of resentment.

A life with no real challenges will do that to someone. Boredom gets filled with drugs, realistic goals get swapped with delusions. It really does the person no favors in the long run and it's a shame that people have enabled her for so long. People only get really out of touch like that when they can afford to be.

This (and other factors) contributed to my divorce. I re-married since then and it was a no brained when we really found weird how much stuff we had in common + Long term goals were 100% a match. Living my best life next to an amazing partner, the love of my life.

Do you know how prevalent diabetes is in those people and dogs because of corn and wheat? Dogs and people sure didn't get diabetes until that change to their diet

Moving to a new city and getting a new job in your field is a massive risk assuming it's possible at all.

In the future I'd suggest not giving this kind of advice in this situation, it offers zero valuable insight and comes off incredibly condescending for no good reason.

[deleted]

True, but If it's not a double blind study then you can't eliminate the possibility that the respondents aren't reporting the information they think the researchers want to hear. It taints the evidence - biases the sample - especially in human trials.

I've read a number of these "we broke the blinds" placebo studies, and they always find that the people who know they are getting a placebo report extreme results. And, my conclusion is: "of course, they did! They knew that's what the researchers wanted to hear."

That is why dogs have diabetes now. They do not get diabetes in the wild. Grain is not for dogs

[removed]

Domestic dogs are omnivores. They have adapted to eat the same food that humans have over the years and their nutritional requirements are much different than their wild canine companions.

But it never claimed to be a double blind study? Not all experiments are double blind…hell, not all experiments are even single blind.

The same applies to Humans

[removed]

I disagree, our space tech is made out of human wonder, not just for quality of life

Hey prostitution is a valuable job and somebodies gotta do it!