Recent comments in /f/science

jendet010 t1_j8e5h30 wrote

People do them and most go to clinics out of the country. They may have anti inflammatory properties that reduce symptoms to some degree temporarily. The risk is high and published evidence is lacking.

1

Actaeus86 t1_j8e57xv wrote

I am sure that there were a few, especially compared to now. But I highly doubt that anyone in the 1920s was like wow there is 1 female scientist in the entire state, I need to make sure when I have this future movie I show women as the lead scientist. Maybe starting 40s-50s it was much more common (again compared to the 1920s, but still minuscule vs now)

1

Beakersoverflowing t1_j8e48nf wrote

"Herd immunity (also called herd effect, community immunity, population immunity, or mass immunity) is a form of indirect protection that applies only to contagious diseases. It occurs when a sufficient percentage of a population has become immune to an infection, whether through previous infections or vaccination, thereby reducing the likelihood of infection for individuals who lack immunity." -Wikipedia

Show me a covid-19 vaccine that can make me immune to infection. If a product doesn't provide that level of protection it can never be used to achieve herd immunity.

6

wealhtheow t1_j8e3yof wrote

For Covid, infection-generated immunity wanes over time just as vaccine-induced immunity does. Regardless of what taught a person's immune system to recognize and fight SARS-CoV-2, it doesn't last. This has not only been documented from many data sources from many countries (ex nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946 ) it's also apparent in anyone's personal life. I think at this point we all know someone who's gotten covid multiple times.

It's also clear that avoiding infection is important not just to avoid death, but to avoid the negative health effects of multiple bouts of covid. nature.com/articles/s41591-022-02051-3

3

Person012345 t1_j8e3sk3 wrote

If I am reading the title of this thread right, the existence of a *single* young individual with alzheimers is about to "overturn" the idea that alzheimers is "rare" in young people?

Am I supposed to take this article seriously?

1

Justadud513 t1_j8e3gnk wrote

Excess mortality is a great measure but I don’t think the authors adequately show their methodology accounts for confounding variables. Not taking into account clinical characteristics (yes, I know it is difficult to link data in the US) is a major limitation. Figure 1 also reports a correlation of 0.97, but visually it does not look close to that. The bottom left is clustered with data points and the top right is pulling the correlation towards 1, so the methodology may also have limitations. I was surprised the authors did not address this.

Regardless, it still explores excess mortality and vaccination status, which is quite interesting

16

farox t1_j8e364s wrote

3

Generallyawkward1 t1_j8e1jzj wrote

1

JurassicCotyledon t1_j8e1fys wrote

Agreed. Another big question is the comparable impact of vaccine immunity alone reducing transmission, compared to natural immunity from previous exposure. Nearly everyone has been exposed at this point, vaccinated or not. And we don’t have a very effective means at identifying a control group.

1

Chickensandcoke t1_j8e17cz wrote

Interesting study, I wonder if they have any way to tease out the difference between drinking and people who are more social so they drink socially more often. I have a feeling it’s the connection and socializing that helps with dementia.

14

Generallyawkward1 t1_j8e14pw wrote

Long covid is what’s making me worry. A lot of people don’t realise that the origin virus did massive damage to the immune system, especially in people with moderate to low health.

2