Recent comments in /f/science

atchijov t1_j8held8 wrote

The same reason why some choose to beleive into 2000 years old fairy tales… makes life easier.

Not better… not more fulfilling… average person perfectly happy if tomorrow is as today… as a matter of fact, they will stay “happy” even if tomorrow slightly worse than today… especially if you can point to other people and “explain” that they are the reason.

32

zulu_candles t1_j8hdgik wrote

Right, get back to me when fearful faces are fundamental forces, because that's obviously what i meant.

How does the amygdala have anything to process if it doesn't come through the eyes

0

thatissomeBS t1_j8hbtp6 wrote

If you think it's binary, and you're either at risk or not at risk, then this question would be valid. However, it's not binary. "Protected" doesn't need to mean 100% protected to still be protected. Wearing a seatbelt protects you in a crash, but it doesn't mean you can't die while wearing a seatbelt.

48

AutoModerator t1_j8hb6v2 wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

TJSnider1984 t1_j8hautx wrote

Uhm, perhaps I've missed something but I'm troubled by the statement "Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was used in the screen as a positive control of viral entry inhibition via the spike-ACE2 complex", given that hydroxychloroquine has been proven to be ineffective against Covid, ( https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(21)00523-4/fulltext )... How are they asserting that it's a "positive control" aka "some other treatment that is known to produce the expected effect"...

Is this some backhanded way of getting HCQ back on the "effective" list? And if they're using it improperly as a control, doesn't that sadly invalidate the study?

Please understand that I'm actually a believer in and student of Herbal medicine, but sadly know from experience how many false cures and panacea have been promoted.

So, have I missed or misunderstood something?

2

ImageComfortable2843 t1_j8harq0 wrote

I quit drinking all caffeine during the pandemic due to working at home and not really having to get ready every day. once I went back to getting up at 5 AM and driving to the office I realized I just didn’t need it anymore. I feel like a totally different person now. I got a Starbucks in the airport and felt like my head was going to explode and i used to drink 2-4 16oz cups a day for like 14 years.

7

liquid-handsoap t1_j8h9lkb wrote

Well i mean verbal language as words and constructed sentences; so humans.

My point is, our common ancestors communicated with body language way before humans existed. Body language is way older, evolutionary, and therefore more ingrained in instincts.

Sorry for bad english, hope it makes sense

2