They analyzed 1867 extracs to find 2 that have (possibly) some effect.

[removed]

ICU and long term care are two different things. There is no ICU in long term care facilities

[removed]

It takes practically no time in his commenting history to see that he doesn't do that, particularly incessantly.

You've got a burr under your saddle around people pointing this out ever don't you?

[removed]

I think you’ve hit the nail right on the head with you comment.

The inability of public health leaders to explain these things in simple English has resulted in an information vacuum. As a result, people with their own agendas, often self-serving or even nefarious, have moved in to fill it.

The end result is confusion among the public and in many cases distrust and outright hostility towards public health authorities.

I think it’s kind of the kinetic to magnetic influence ratio on solar flux at variable distance from the sun. But I’m not sure.

“break frequency is estimated by finding the frequency where the average dissipation and inertial range fits to the log-spaced magnetic field power spectral density cross each other”

Mine prefers alarms to howl, so don't know what evolution did there

I think the reason low consumption of alcohol is good is because it increases social interaction which in turn decrease the stress hormone (cortisol?), a hormone which impairs the body to regenerate efficiently.

Also too much...it turns to damage, which is logical.

Personally I'm very fond of good ol' water.

Interesting consideration.

Also how the whole Ivermectin nonsense started for the most part. Some tests on Covid samples in vitro showed early promise for Ivermectin, but came to nothing when tested in vivo.

Yet 3 years later, some people still don't get the difference.

I mean, I recall having this exact conversation in class with our science teacher at 14. In theory, if you could extract all of someone's blood and subject it to bleach/alcohol/UV/etc then in theory some diseases could be cured.

But extracting all of someone's blood is not a thing. Not if you want them alive anyway.

I looked up what you said, apparently hyenas are considered cat like mammals, closer to cats than dogs. I think the guy above may have been confused.

Wow, amazing! Congratulations.

The subject of various cancers is not talked enough. If you can and have time, can you tell us a bit about your journey? How you discovered it, did you notice it because you were in pain or random screening? You had cancer because of the lifestyle/work/exposure to chemicals? At what stage and what were the steps from there? Also any changes after to prevent it (lifestyle/environment)? Not a lot of details but what we should know and what you learned from your experience. Thanks, congrats and many many years without cancer

[removed]

Maybe before becoming a scientists, they should focus on learning how to write proper sentences so people won't have to decipher them and wonder which of 5 possible meanings is the correct one. If one sentence requires 5 additional explanatory sentences to be understood, maybe we should focus on learning how to write that first sentence so that people don't require additional text to understand it. I swear these people are trying to figure out how to save the world but probably can't do their own laundry.

Ooof that F’ing headline. Anyone else have to ready that a few times to figure out what they were trying to say?

Annoyingly, this article does not say what alleles of rs762551 increase the metabolization of caffeine, so I had to look it up. C/A and C/C are the slower variants; there's apparently little difference between C/A and C/C metabolization according to SNPedia. A/A is ultrarapid metabolization. The article implies only A/A is good to go.

Useful if you had a DNA test and want to look up what you are--which I have and did immediately after reading this. Thankfully, I was A/A.

Sauce: https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs762551

That you spend your days on the internet incessantly making this argument like it matters, or will change someone's mind, or that the imaginary points that some random strangers will give you for regurgitating it validate you paints an interesting picture

>most people stated that they wanted to avoid finding out that one of their colleagues or family members was a Stasi informant and that viewing those files would impact their ability to trust others

Anecdotally: it didn't work, though, as the former denunciants knew who they informed on and either came out (didn't hear that from my parents) or acted different and thereby dropped hints.

IMO the water on that is seriously muddled, as

• files and viewing opportunity have been available for 20-30 years, mixing now nostalgia and real reasons back when the decision had been made
• files were given out incremental, making experience worse: files aren't even complete yet (a lot of paper had been shredded manually and money wasn't made available to recover the files)
  (Anecdote again: my father abstained from asking for _further_ files later.)

[removed]

Nope. That decision was post-GDR.

I am resigned to my caffeinated oblivion, thank you very much.