Happiness causes death, we get it

Sports massage but with leather straps

Lets not put diet soda in the same category as gatorade/vitamin water and perpetuate the "diet soda gives you cancer/heart disease/whatever" misinformation. Diet soda is not a "health drink" by any measure despite "health food" already being a vague and meaningless term, but there's no free sugar (or any sugar) in it whereas drinks like gatorade are full of free sugars. This particular study isn't discussing sugar substitutes and their potential effects on long term health.

We (citizens of industrialized nations) cannot blame it on the rich because in the global context we belong to the rich too

Sugar is free now? Nice

From the posted definition, the milk is fine. Honey is just pure sugar. It isn’t explicitly called out but it is chemically almost identical to white table sugar.

It’s free sugar since it lacks the fiber needed to slow the sugar absorption and avoid a big blood sugar rise.

Fruit juice is just as bad as soda, basically.

Came here for this.

No the scale of our electrical needs is easily met with nuclear. We just can't let capitalism run them.

Also op was talking about recently built reactors and new ones planned, China has built the most recently and has planned the most in the future. Why does everyone want to ignore the literal billions of dollars oil and gas has spent to spoil people's opinions on nuclear energy to the point that you just can't fathom building hundreds of plants around the globe.

Edit: what mechanisms exist in society that will allow us, the working class to change things to the point that we don't require as much energy in the future? Capitalism only knows consumption, and they're in charge. They own the oil and gas and they own the politicians that legislate. The future is the poor getting priced out of energy and dying, it's not a utopia of reduced emissions ushered in by shell, ExxonMobil and Halliburton continuing record profits.

How is this not merely Darwinian evolution?

Dr Atkins wrote about it back in the 1970s.

>The sugars naturally present in milk and dairy products, fresh and most types of processed fruit and vegetables and in cereal grains, nuts and seeds are excluded from the definition.

Bumping for visibility because that's a dank ass based response.

Please tell me my coffee with milk and honey is ok. It's got them cow squeezing, right?

You know that those Chinese nuclear plants amount to 5% of their electricity needs, right? If anything, the US already has about twice as many reactors as China and more than anyone else in the world - yet those are just 18% of the US' electricity.

A fully/mostly nuclear grid in the US is always presented as if it's a matter of building just a few more reactors, when the reality is that without a major reduction to the current levels of electricity consumption, you would have to build (and operate) a few hundred more of them. If you think that oil and gas industry is the only reason the US did not build 300/400 more nuclear power plants by now...well, OK, I guess.

It’s not people that ignore it so much as people who were never educated about reality. The type of people that believe diet soda, gatorade, and vitamin water are health drinks. Marketing and pushing sugar addiction has really done a number on people.

I think this is an excellent time to give a big thank you to young Einstein for using his chisel to split the first beer atom and finally getting bubbles in beer.

[removed]

Well hospitals are still overwhelmingly full of people who ignore this, so it doesn’t seem like it.

Don't need, that first comma.

Possibly Glycine and GABA. Both are inhibitory neurotransmitters. Taking them daily might help possibly.

>forever chemicals

PFAS and PFOA

https://chemtrust.org/pfas/

[removed]

That is taking very polar views and is quite cynical to me as a scientist who certainly got vaccinated, goes to the doctor annually, yet smokes, drinks and - most of all - doesn't judge others for their problems.