Recent comments in /f/science

randerton1 t1_j916woh wrote

Up to half in 3 months is simply not a believable figure/statement based on real world anecdotal experience - and how can "unrealized symptoms" not impacting life functions in any way as implied by some be measured from a practical perspective? Also agreed that "up to half" could technically mean anything less than 50% but implies something close to 50% or the statement is meaningless.

0

VoltaicSketchyTeapot t1_j916fbd wrote

>people still fall for the logical fallacies she did.

She didn't fall for a logical fallacy. With the information she had at the time (apparently this was very early for syphilis), she made the most logical decision for her life.

People today have the opportunity to understand more of the underlying science. They're different and we shouldn't insult this woman comparing her to current events.

7

ibo92can t1_j9161th wrote

From Norway. My electric bill is around 100% more. Fuel is at least 50% more expensive. Food and groseries some products are doubled in price and most other is 25%> increased. And norway do produce both electric and petrol....

5

AutoModerator t1_j914mtb wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

phrygianLord t1_j913csu wrote

Oh since Russia invaded? Now let’s see the numbers from when Biden and his cronies blew up the Nordstream pipeline to let the private corps come to the rescue. You know, for science

0

ruetoesoftodney t1_j91398a wrote

This uses wood as a sorbent to capture CO2 from a gas stream (targeting combustion exhaust) with the CO2 then being released and the sorbent used again. It is not an option for long-term storage.

46

reaganmien t1_j9133kk wrote

For the month of December, yes. It highly affects those who heat up their houses with radiators using only electricity. The price in December per kWh was about $0,4. As of February its below $0,1 per kWh. I lowered the temperature at home which is 200m2 to 17 degrees and was able to keep my bill at $500. We are getting refunds by government subsidies now however to cover for the higher costs.

5

redvodkandpinkgin t1_j912bed wrote

I don't know the study you reference, but SSRIs and SNRIs were shown to improve depression over placebos countless times for a long time now. It's no miracle, mind you, but it still works at least better than nothing

0

ElectionOver4Hours t1_j912b5y wrote

SCIENTISTS have found a NEW WAY to generate PROFIT that justifies a huge COMPANY... Instead of planting trees which is the cheaper, better, more environmental solution.

'Carbon capture', I'm taking about you specifically.

Honestly, so many solutions can be had if we just accept a tiny reduction in economic output and restructure our economies by the tiniest amounts

34