rising_pho3nix t1_j9j7vs6 wrote
Can't imagine where we'll be in 10 more years of innovation..
ground__contro1 t1_j9j81ii wrote
Perhaps never having to innovate again
Atheios569 t1_j9j9hmv wrote
Yep, and where does that leave us?
GlobusGlobus t1_j9jasjc wrote
In a sex dungeon?
duboispourlhiver t1_j9jhxrd wrote
What a time to be alive
fuck_your_diploma t1_j9jnxhz wrote
[unzips]
gentleman339 t1_j9kz2zc wrote
get away from that diploma
GlobusGlobus t1_j9l14gv wrote
Underapreciated.
[deleted] t1_j9lofnh wrote
[deleted]
ground__contro1 t1_j9ja29h wrote
At the whims of unknown forces I expect
Ylsid t1_j9jar4n wrote
Unknown forces, like the Megacorp that controls the tech
Nico_ t1_j9jd8d4 wrote
If AIs can be optimzed to run on a single graphics cards there is no controlling this.
Ylsid t1_j9jeu7o wrote
I just hope stable diffusion isn't a one off
Queue_Bit t1_j9jt52q wrote
All it takes is one smart, slightly motivated person to make a free option that's "good enough"
Ylsid t1_j9jtgcg wrote
More than one. It takes a lot of skill, time and money, which are hard to come by if you aren't a megacorp. That isn't to say it can't happen, but that it's much more difficult than you may expect.
WithoutReason1729 t1_j9jx2u1 wrote
Language models seem to be a way steeper difficulty curve though. The difference between Stable Diffusion and image generators from like a few years before it is big, but the older models are still good enough to often produce viable output. But the difference between a huge language model and a large open-source one is a way bigger gap, because even getting small things wrong can lead to completely unintelligible sentences that were clearly written by a machine.
Queue_Bit t1_j9jyddi wrote
Yeah, for sure, but as technology improves it's just going to get easier and easier. And this technology is likely to get so good that to a normal person, the difference between the best and the world and "good enough for everyday life" is likely huge.
ToHallowMySleep t1_j9jvphi wrote
It already runs happily on last-gen hardware. I've been running it on my 10GB 3080.
walkarund t1_j9k92lw wrote
It doesn't even have to be last-gen. It works well on my 4gb GTX 970 with 8gb of ram, it is very impressive how optimized it is
Ylsid t1_j9jzigu wrote
Stable diffusion works on my 6gb 2060RTX, but I am quite sure GPT3 wouldn't
ToHallowMySleep t1_j9jzzar wrote
maybe a 5090. ;)
Ylsid t1_j9k00fw wrote
An a100 sure! If you got three!
rising_pho3nix t1_j9jp2rh wrote
Exactly.. endless possibilities. Something like M3GAN could be real.
Slapbox t1_j9kovoy wrote
The first superhuman AGI will likely give its creator an insurmountable lead.
ground__contro1 t1_j9jbr1p wrote
I mean, humans have lived basically our entire lives, as a species and often individually, governed by forces we couldn’t really explain at the time. This still seems different though. Seems like no turning back. But maybe that’s been true for a long time.
mindbleach t1_j9k2m0w wrote
We've already got that. What else do you have?
ground__contro1 t1_j9kqekc wrote
Oh, just, yanno, more of it
unholymanserpent t1_j9jfpjq wrote
Pets to AI
Atheios569 t1_j9jivja wrote
Was leaning towards incubator for AI, but this works too lol.
unholymanserpent t1_j9jus0e wrote
Sounds scary but idk my pets are very loved and live very cushy lives with all their needs taken care of 🤷🏽
Atheios569 t1_j9jwcy3 wrote
The furries had it right the whole time.
NNOTM t1_j9k6gw6 wrote
Just because humans (usually) treat pets well doesn't mean AIs will though - or for that matter, find any use in pets at all
unholymanserpent t1_j9kd99g wrote
You're right, but that doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of potential issues with this change of status. Screw pets, what's the point of having us around? The gap in intelligence between us and them could be like the difference between us and worms. AI having us as pets is definitely on the optimistic side of things
NNOTM t1_j9kecol wrote
Yeah, I pretty much agree
Solandri t1_j9jjr0k wrote
Best case scenario.
the_gruffalo t1_j9krspc wrote
So, The Culture then?
Throwaway__shmoe t1_j9k1llg wrote
Hopefully sleep.
JustChillDudeItsGood t1_j9jt94z wrote
Just chillin, it's all good.
scapestrat0 t1_j9jg3dl wrote
Because of AGI or 'cuz we'll be ded
perceptualdissonance t1_j9j9kmu wrote
Not in this omniverse
coumineol t1_j9jdre7 wrote
Can't imagine where we'll be in 10 more years of innovation.
sideways t1_j9jjiuq wrote
On a beach sipping strawberry daiquiri, hopefully.
kickstartmyfartt t1_j9jna6l wrote
And not a single McDonalds shake machine out of order.
skob17 t1_j9ksqkk wrote
We already have digital nomads that do this.
sprucenoose t1_j9m63h2 wrote
All of humanity compressed into the thin strip of lifeless sand comprising Earth's border between the land and salty depths, with no sustenance except a single alcoholic beverage?
gthing t1_j9kgp3c wrote
Two more papers down the line. What a time to be alive!
brettins t1_j9km9fp wrote
Hold onto your papers!
rising_pho3nix t1_j9kgu5g wrote
Yeah, absolutely.
metametamind t1_j9khf8n wrote
I had a wondering the other day: “what does thousand-year old computer code look like?” “Ten-thousand?” “Million?”
putsonshorts t1_j9kqyb5 wrote
!Remindme 10 years
RemindMeBot t1_j9kr199 wrote
I will be messaging you in 10 years on 2033-02-22 18:18:14 UTC to remind you of this link
1 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)
| ^(Info) | ^(Custom) | ^(Your Reminders) | ^(Feedback) |
|---|
Anenome5 t1_j9n5alq wrote
Bam, that's the kind of thing I want to read, because that's a direct reference to singularity :)
Supersamtheredditman t1_j9nphhm wrote
Well according to some we won’t even make it 10 years
ImperishableNEET t1_ja061ve wrote
Disassembled at the molecular level for paperclip production.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments