They aren’t necessarily broad categories. You can ask ai to do something in the style of a specific artist. Say, van gough. His style was not a broad category, it was very distinct. And even he had styles within his styles, different periods.

Ai can be broad or specific, when it gets too specific as in people asking for “in the style of van gough” then we need some copyright protections.

Picked van gough as an example because he killed himself thinking he was worthless. He’d be even worse off today

[deleted]

For someone who makes such a big deal about being a PROUD ROMANIAN, you don't seem to care much about actually living there

Did you mean:

marxism socialism communism

[deleted]

I think by this time next year it will be capable of writing one. But we'll see.

[deleted]

Well then, go and try to do everything all by yourself without using the fruit of anyone else's labour, see how far that gets you

And you resorted to babbling nonsense again!

[deleted]

Bending definitions and obsessively going through all of my comments, typical Consaine

How are you enjoying your mom's basement?

I am all for it, medical nanobots, if they could help me avoid undergoing colonoscopy. But there must be downsides to nanobots. I never hear anyone talk about them. Except for gray goo scenarios.

And to oppose collectivism is to deny the nature of humanity, therefore fascism will never achieve its goals

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Are you actually stupid enough to not know what an equivalent is, or are you just trolling?

[deleted]

Yes I'm sure the word of the Chinese equivalent of Scientology is very trustworthy

it would be a machine process capable of adapting any series of problems and datasets, further it could "learn" from doing said problems and evaluating datasets (language, math, DNA), and essentially reprogram itself to get exponentially better at "learning."

Take the 2+2=4 problem (and more broadly 2+2=5). AGI would be able to solve 2+2=4 without any additional information, separate from a dictionary, similar to how a child in preschool would learn math with blocks, similarly AGI would be able to think on the moral problem of 2+2=5.

We don't know what AGI really is because we have a technology limit, ie. we can't synthesize the human brain, beyond having a child. And we can't recreate the human brain organically because of the ethical implications (and well, we don't know how to either).

i come from poland and if someone says that he/she is praying - they mean it :-)

cheers!

> taxes would come to the governments in greater amount than before

I'm skeptical of this. See the last part of my post.

I’d rather say that by the time AI ca n do all those things, we’ll have bigger problems than musicians and artists being replaced, at that point AI will be able to do everything better than humans.

Haha sorry, It was a set phrase, I don't mean literally praying, I'm an atheist.

I think that it's also used in english, but maybe it is not that common? At least in my language there are a lot of expressions that include religious terms (like praying or god) that are quite common, and I don't feel particulary bad using them when they seem fit to the conversation.

It means "let's HOPE+WISH that they keep publishing the papers".

I don't mention the code because...well, I WISH that they published it, but I have no HOPE for that hahaha

Thanks for sharing. I read a lot of manhwa and web comics, but I haven't heard of this.