Recent comments in /f/singularity
dragon_dez_nuts t1_j6bfg06 wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Same
sailhard22 t1_j6bfcsg wrote
Reply to comment by Virgence in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
You think that’s air you’re breathing?
kalavala93 OP t1_j6beugy wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
Don't have a uni education but I'm a cloud infrastructure engineer. I'll probably be fine.
DarkCeldori t1_j6beu4r wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
What are you talking about? Ca akg preliminary data appears to show it reverses epigenetic age by years, and epigenetic changes appear to be the cause of aging. Resveratrol basically halts age related changes in gene expression in the heart, keeping it young indefinitely.
Sinclair is bringing blindness treatment to clinical trials within 1 or 2 years iirc.
Alzheimer progress was halted by melatonin in one case study in another it also halted parkinsons. Regrowth of teeth is already in animal trials. As for organs it is likely we can use embryonic development for that and do humanized chimeras in pigs, the research is already quite advanced.
Cancer within years a company doing transfusions from cancer immune humans to normal humans will bring a product to market. There are also nanoparticle sponges from another company that appears highly effective.
True nanobots are likely to be the result of advanced synthetic biology using unevolvable designs. Recently ai has allowed for zinc finger design which will enable the edition of the genome at arbitrary points greatly accelerating progress. Also ai has beem able to predict many existing proteins and design novel ones with novel functions iirc just exactly what we need for nanobots.
Striking_Ad1492 t1_j6bea28 wrote
I sometimes like looking at this subreddit with it showing actual legitimate advancements in stuff, but my god this place can often have a lot of detached, techno-bro, copium content in it. I guess it’s a sign of life not being pleasant for a lot of people right now.
sideways t1_j6be6nu wrote
Reply to Assume the future's history books will in hindsight agree about what the first publicly-released AGI was. At the time of that AGI's release, what percentage of early-adopters will consider it to be AGI? by Z3F
Personally I'm inclined to think that the Transformer itself is artificial general intelligence. We have that already - we just don't have human level AGI.
[deleted] t1_j6bdx8b wrote
[deleted]
DarkCeldori t1_j6bdehu wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Food can still be improved. Bread and fruit that remains good for months or years. Also polyphenol content can be increased and sugars replaced with natural zero calorie sweeteners through genetic engineering. Animals could be modified to be high in healthier monounsaturated fat rather than saturated fat.
As for ai there are technologies such as robots and humanoid biodroids that are possible also full immersion vr through connections to the brain. Enabling regeneration curing cancer and aging. Allowing for brain transplants. Also true nanomachine tech, appliances and devices made with true nanomachine tech can self repair self clean and can last for billions of years if they have energy provided.
slickhedstrong t1_j6bcyvm wrote
mcilrain t1_j6bcq9o wrote
Reply to comment by GanjARAM in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
That tech isn't going to be used in a substantial way on anything that supports 8th gen consoles.
TinyBurbz t1_j6bcp0w wrote
Reply to comment by Trumaex in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
>I'm in gamdev space... and the tech in 2013 doesn't even come close to what's available right now, and for free. Just look at Unreal Engine 5 demos or even Unity HDRP demos.
We have been an a bit if a lul until recently. Raytracing is neat and all, but it was lipstick on a pig. Fact is, graphics have been improving a lot slower than they used to.
​
About UE 5.1, Lumen and Nanite have changed everything, however.
mcilrain t1_j6bceho wrote
> My video games don’t look much better than they did in 2013.
8th gen consoles were underpowered so other than a bump in resolution from 720p -> 1080p there wasn't much of an appreciable difference. 9th gen consoles didn't sell well so games are still made to support 8th gen consoles.
vernes1978 t1_j6bc915 wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
if this wasn't posted here I'd think you were telling us you were homeless and on acid.
DarkCeldori t1_j6bc0b8 wrote
Reply to comment by genshiryoku in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
The brain can learn even with few data. A baby that grows in a mostly empty room and hears his parents voices still becomes fully competent within a few years.
If ai begins to use brain like algorithms given it does millions of years of training, data will not be a problem.
_dekappatated t1_j6bag6k wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Still having a human hand at 54 million years old
Jenkinswarlock t1_j6b9ulc wrote
Reply to comment by Virgence in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
I’m not sure if I would constitute that as “myself” unless I were to upload in a way prior
Virgence t1_j6b9px6 wrote
Reply to comment by Jenkinswarlock in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Even if that were to happen, you could be resurrected in virtual reality.
Lartnestpasdemain t1_j6b8re9 wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Well you'll still have to wait to be this old 🤔
Firestar222 t1_j6b8hux wrote
Reply to comment by mvfsullivan in Andrew, release ani NOW by mvfsullivan
If you’re serious I hope you get some help for yourself. Many many years ago I was quite hopeless as well. Now I think almost every day how glad I am that I didn’t do anything crazy. You never know how life will end up, but if you’re down low chances are it will be much, much better soon.
Akimbo333 t1_j6b7zsh wrote
Reply to comment by Inevitable_Snow_8240 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Oh yeah I agree
mvfsullivan OP t1_j6b51k3 wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in Andrew, release ani NOW by mvfsullivan
Actually no, I'm a severely fucked up alcoholic and dangerously close to suicide. Sorry not the response you were expecting im sure.
I should be fine honestly. Im optimistic on AGI happening soon enough to fix all of my issues.
Crude reality I know but its the best I have and I'm clinging onto it for life.
Spacebetweenthenoise t1_j6b4n3a wrote
Reply to Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer
Link?
GanjARAM t1_j6b4h2m wrote
Kaje26 t1_j6b47mj wrote
Because it was? Because unfortunately scientific progress is reaching a road block?
DarkCeldori t1_j6bge0g wrote
Reply to comment by genshiryoku in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Moores law is about miniaturization of transistors and doubling of transistor count. It is true we also used to get significant clock speed increases that we no longer do. But moores law didnt stop it only slowed down from every 18 months to every 2.5 years or something like that this happened last decade as a result of constant delays in the development of extreme ultraviolet lithography equipment but that is now solved and it is back to every 18 months iirc.
But thanks to moores law and koomeys law continuing we have seen constant increases in energy efficiency and computational power.
We are indeed facing some significant issues still some parts such as sram which is vital for cache sizes iirc have stopped scaling. Also it seems the reduction in cost per transistor has slowed or perhaps even ended recently. Microsoft estimated they wouldnt get cost reduction from moving to newer smaller transistors and thus chose to do two versions of xbox a cheap and an expensive one from the start.
If cost reduction is not solved we could be in serious trouble. As clearly a doubling of transistors requires at least a halving of transistor cost to be viable.