Recent comments in /f/singularity
Agarikas t1_j6ci5s9 wrote
Reply to comment by Jenkinswarlock in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Don't worry your atoms ain't going anywhere.
Agarikas t1_j6ci3ny wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Someone might looking at this meme from the future and I don't really know what to tell them besides "It was what it was".
Steven81 t1_j6chw1k wrote
Reply to comment by Jenkinswarlock in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
There is a downside with being infused with such ideas from early on. I'm prolly older than a lot of this sub (hopefully not by a lot) but I came in contact with age of the spiritual machines and similar ideas in the mid to late 90s...
Ever since then , no matter how small the danger (towards my life) I get spooked. For example I had a minor hospitalization lately, my iv hooked veins often develop phlebitis soon after. A mostly benign condition that almost never develops to something worse like DVT.
Yet I'm losing sleep over it, misjudge even slight muscle pain on the upper arm as the start of some nasty DVT. That's not even my 1st time with phlebitis. I get it almost every time I get hooked with IV lines (for often silly reasons) , so my subconcious should have been trained.
I was not like that at all as a kid. I think my hope that longevity escape velocity happens in my generation, made me paranoid in some subconcious manner and I'm accutely aware of my possible mortality, more than I would otherwise be.
I hope that younger generations that learn/read of such stuff do not fall in this pitfall. Whether you have a lot to gain (or less) by staying alive for as long as possible, does not make your death at his moment more imminent/probable. Yet that's the subconcious feeling (suddenly each danger is acute) that often arises if you let it.
Be aware, live your life! Obviously avoid stupid dangers, but often that's enough your body (and some medical checkups as you grow older) takes care of the rest for the vast vast majority of cases (which very probably includes you)
Me stressing over it, even subconsciously has actually made my health worse than it would otherwise be (stress more generally). It's ironic, but it is there. Be aware, our minds can be stupid like that.
Rogue_Moon_Boy t1_j6chfgi wrote
Reply to comment by jsseven777 in I don't see why AGI would help us by TheOGCrackSniffer
I'd like to think an AGI with a physical form attached is smarter than us humans, therefore sees how destructive and useless wars actually are. If it's capable to survive outer space, it would know it has basically unlimited space for itself. I also think it would realize how wasteful unlimited duplication of itself would be.
AI space wars is a construct of Sci-Fi authors for dramatic purposes, and I think those authors haven't really understood, or deliberately ignored, how vast the universe actually is. War in itself exists because of 2 reasons:
- Ego
- Limited resources and land
Akimbo333 t1_j6cgv29 wrote
Reply to comment by Steven81 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Ok I understand!
grahag t1_j6cgtbx wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in How life with UBI could look like by Financial_Donut_64
Frankly, I think that's a great idea. The government SHOULD produce anything that is required to live. It doesn't have to be top shelf quality, but it would need to be an alternative to for-profit products and services.
glutenfree_veganhero t1_j6cgt1s wrote
The list you made was application of already known paradigms. Last 10 years are us stumbling into the unknown and developing new tools. So in a sense more real progress.
GayHitIer t1_j6cg96e wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
Or two 😆
Same with the we will not have planes for thousands of years and then it happens just after that.
We will never use nuclear fuel as power and then it happens just after that.
Never say never.
purepersistence t1_j6cg0pk wrote
I already do.
JohnnySasaki20 t1_j6cfla0 wrote
Reply to comment by RichardKingg in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Nope.
Steven81 t1_j6cfkit wrote
Reply to comment by Akimbo333 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
I still think that a 16 year old game like Crysis has no place to look as good as it does today. A semi open world with fully destructible environment, tactics from your opponents and one of the best jungle environments to this days, with probably some of the best explosions to this day...
Contrast it with with 1991 games vs it. Graphics and videogame mechanics have definitely slowed, by a whole lot. There was no new paradigm to follow the one that brought us to the mid '00s...
Having said that , it is to be expected. The industry has matured, you need exponentially more money with very little return (both in results and money from said results). It's the prototypical S curve.
Next step in videogames would only happen when we change the medium (say being in them instead of controlling within a screen). By then there would be a fresh reason to progress fast... we are not there yet.
Ok-Jackfruit-7283 t1_j6cf6bz wrote
Reply to comment by trinaryouroboros in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
No, we know that the laws of physics can't be broken.
Rogue_Moon_Boy t1_j6cenjm wrote
Reply to comment by ftc1234 in I don't see why AGI would help us by TheOGCrackSniffer
Avoiding falling off a cliff is not the same as having survival instincts. It would just mean it knows the rules of physics, looks at a cliff and the ground below and calculates the impact velocity and sees it would harm itself when it would jump down. It would be a specificly trained feature.
That's not the same as being self aware or having "instincts". It's just one input value into a neural net that has a greater weight than everything else and says don't do it because it's bad.
Instincts in a human are mostly guesstimates because of irrational feelings, and we are actually really bad and inaccurate at it eg. stage fright, fear of rejection, the need to show off as a breeding ritual and many other instincts that would be totally useless for a machine.
A machine like an AGI is the opposite of irrational, it's all about cold calculations and statistics. You'd have to deliberately train or code "instincts" into an AGI for it to be able to simulate it.
Sci-Fi literature always tries to humanize AGI for dramatic purposes, and tries to portray it as that one thing that out of nowhere boooom -> is self aware/conscious. In reality, it will be a very lengthy and deliberate process to reach that point, if we want it to in the first place. We have all the control over it to learn or not learn stuff, or check/prevent/clamp unwanted outputs of a neural net.
Kaining t1_j6cden6 wrote
Reply to comment by WashiBurr in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
You're putting the carriage before the horse here.
Consciousness first, body then. Consciousness is consciousness regardless of whatever body it is. It's molded by the body but is is what it is. New brain, new memories, new nervous system, new feeling, ect... That's kind of how the reincarnation thingy explains why you don't get to keep memories from previous life in buddhism btw and it kind of make sences. And is a bit fallacious and dodgy too as it kind of nullify the appeal of reincarnation when you first learn of the concept. It ain't a restart button at all. More of a "things stay the same in a constantly changing world" impermanence trick.
So you could rez a completely different consciousness into a VR game and it would still act the same as the being you resurected as long as you "built" it right. The problem here is not knowing if its "you" but if there is a "you" inside that VR avatar. That's an aspect of the "brain in a vat" thingy. How can you be sure that others are real when all of reality is merely a projection of your brain. How can you be sure you are even here is another nasty issue.
Ego Death is a thing afterall.
Lawjarp2 t1_j6cd4rp wrote
Reply to New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
It did happen in the next century
FirstEbb2 t1_j6cd3zi wrote
Not everyone needs to value you and approve of you, learn to live with life or you will end up as dry as a fish on the beach.
Kolinnor t1_j6cczf9 wrote
Reply to comment by ginger_gcups in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Computer, load up Celery man please
Ok-Jackfruit-7283 t1_j6ccle6 wrote
Reply to comment by Yuli-Ban in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
I've been thinking about this for a while and the only logical conclusion that I can come to is that death will always be inevitable. I think I'm going to kill myself to get it over with now if I'm being honest. Because no matter what I do or how long I live it's still going to end abruptly when I'm not ready, so I don't see any real point to continue living further.
Pingasplz t1_j6ccbca wrote
Troll bait.
ElvinRath t1_j6cb022 wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
So, still no house and single, right?
OutOfBananaException t1_j6caq3v wrote
Reply to comment by phoenixmusicman in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Your uploaded self will get terrible anxiety when moving between networks. I wonder if there will be uploads that refuse to move from the substrate they were uploaded to..
SparePie8386 t1_j6cakz7 wrote
dafq u mean by guff? 😂💀
SparePie8386 t1_j6cajtr wrote
AngryArmour t1_j6c9qkc wrote
Reply to I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Goddamn, that's the dream
Agarikas t1_j6ci7xy wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Richman in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
Gimme a week to really think this through.