Recent comments in /f/singularity

wavefxn22 t1_j6d8crl wrote

Reply to comment by visarga in Google not releasing MusicLM by Sieventer

I don’t think you understand what I said; there’s a range. A work in the style of Van Gogh, is a limited style range that should have copyright protections. A work in the style of Impressionism however is fair use.

1

drekmonger t1_j6d3ll9 wrote

Reply to comment by FoveatedRendering in My human irrationality is already taking over: as generative AI progresses, I've been growing ever more appreciative of human-made media by Yuli-Ban

I think it'll be like the holodeck. You'll still have "holodeck writers", creative people who have created interesting programs. But the actual content creation will amount to a natural language dialogue between a human and a marshalling AI that will transparently assign tasks to other AIs to create the overall experience.

"That Klingon's phaser should be bigger and have some cool runic designs on it."

5

HeinrichTheWolf_17 t1_j6d13uz wrote

Reply to Will humans rebel against the AI? by Plenty-Side-2902

There will be at least some resistance on some level, AI Art pretty much put that on display for us early on.

My best advice (if you’re a Transhumanist anyway) is not to worry about it, get your nano augmentations or migrate off of biology, merge with AGI, expand your consciousness etc… and just ignore luddites, progress always wins 99.99% of the time, reactionaries are just a historical meme, they’ve always been losers, like literally, they lose every single time.

3

FoveatedRendering t1_j6d0j0x wrote

Reply to My human irrationality is already taking over: as generative AI progresses, I've been growing ever more appreciative of human-made media by Yuli-Ban

I think almost all creatives will be using AI tools to bring their imaginations to life in the future.

Even when we have a perfect magic media machine, we won't know exactly what we want(unless the AI has our data), so we might often prefer to watch the most popular movies or play games that are made by other humans using this perfect magic media machine instead of doing it ourselves. I suspect media created by professionals using AI will always be better until AGI.

The popular media will eventually be edited to suit our tastes too. I see AI as another tool that humans will use to improve their productivity, it shouldn't be seen as humans vs AI but as Photoshop vs Dreambooth until AGI.

7

C4PTNK0R34 t1_j6czkmm wrote

Reply to comment by Jenkinswarlock in I’m ready by CassidyHouse

This is the part where things get rather difficult to theorize. If the transfer of mind and memory to an artificial construct were possible, would there then be two separate versions of yourself with the same consciousness? Or would you be conscious of your original body only while the duplicate believes itself to also be the original?

Assuming that at the time of the Singularity, we've already created a Matryoshka Brain, a particular Deus Est Machina of sorts. >! (A literal God AI, Deus Est Machina roughly translates to God is Machine. A Matryoshka Brain is a supercomputer-powered AI inside a Dyson Sphere powered by the consumption of an entire star that would theoretically be able to hold conversation with the entire world without using 0.1% of its processing power.) !< As well as assuming that our consciousness is tied to our own minds and memories, then death becomes a minor inconvenience while a new artificial you is created after whatever mishap you endured occurs. Human evolution is then flung forwards as time suddenly becomes endless.

1