Yeah, it's like there is a giant smoke screen in front of us, we can make out general shapes, but nothing of clarity.

Wow!

Most prominent research is probably Aubrey De Grey, he says we will reach Longievity Escape Velocity in 2036 with a 50% chance.

Other than that I don't really know technology is advancing too fast for me to give anything of good predictions.

It's simple, really. Acceleration costs energy. Energy is not free. Furthermore technology leaves a footprint. Nothing is perfect. Technology certainly isn't.

This is getting serious

This article makes no such claims, and I don't see anyone in this thread making such claims either, so who are you responding to?

I am not too familiar with the details of block chain. Can someone explain to me what's happening?

That’s just how I breezed through reading it in my head… am I AI?

Schrodinger's Monk: A monk leaves his monastery, vowing to meditate atop a mountain in solitude until the end of days, as is the path their particular practice.

None will know whether he has left his body, until the next brother follows this same path. For a certain amount of time, Schrodinger's monk can be thought of as being both alive & dead, up until the next monk observes his body, thereby collapsing the wave function 🤓

Chatgpt probably can be called AI. What people mean though when they say AI is they mean an artificial being with sense of self. That's not gonna happen. Probably at some point the tech would advance to the point where the machinery used itself evolves during the process of learning and the machine's parts start to express sense of self. Chatgpt should be considered big data ai that can understand things and should be used appropriately.

Also we need proper regulations around ai for safety and to block sinister use.

Summary from chatGPT:

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is in Washington D.C. this week to demystify the advanced chatbot ChatGPT to lawmakers and explain its uses and limitations. The chatbot, which is powered by cutting edge AI, is so capable that its responses are indistinguishable from human writing. The technology's potential impact on academic learning, disruption of entire industries and potential misuse has sparked concern among lawmakers. OpenAI, the company that created ChatGPT, has a partnership with Microsoft, which has agreed to invest around $10 billion into the company. In the meetings, Altman has also told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating "artificial general intelligence," a term used to describe an artificial intelligence that can think and understand on the level of the human brain. This has led to discussions about the need for regulation and oversight for the technology. OpenAI was formed as a nonprofit in 2015 by some of the tech industry's most successful entrepreneurs, like Elon Musk, investor Peter Thiel, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and Y Combinator founding partner Jessica Livingston. A central mandate was to study the possibility that artificial intelligence could do harm to humanity. Therefore, it makes sense that Altman would be on a tour of Washington right now to discuss the potential impacts of the technology on society and the need for regulation.

My thanks and compliments on this, it's very informative, very interesting, and very well written!

Would love to see a "filled-in" technology evolution tree for perhaps the last few decades or so. Hope you do one!

More nui mahalos and all the best too!

Surely, let's just wait and see.

Honestly what's amazing to me is that God of War (2018) already looks a little aged, with how light bleeds through certain objects. The lighting in God of War Ragnarok looks much better. Also don't forget about Cyberpunk 2077 and the 3090 and 4090 graphics cards.

Some people be lucky. You say you have close friends and family members AND you want an intelligent AI to talk with? Jk lol.

yeah, think that's why Buddhist monks always go wayyyy up in the mountains... like, "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, did it really die?" 😅

Ironic and kind of you to share a summary, I appreciate YOU. I wasn't going to read all that

I said speech to text. :p

The arm isn't being cut off though. The arm is heing removed, burned to ashes, then had the ashes sort through and rebuilt.

The clone thing supports my argument.

This makes a lot of sense.

A lot of what instruct fine tuning and rlhf is that if you provide some high quality, specifically created data to an LLM while it's being fine tuned, you get a significant jump in results for this fine tuned model - versus just giving them more of the same structured data.

In some of the papers I read, a lot of the conclusions are akin to "next steps is trying to see if more instruction data will improve results".

Some of the challenges with this instruction data is that well we just don't have a lot. We don't have for example... A lot of the recordings of people using computers to complete tasks. Like keystrokes and screen recording.

I don't think this sounds like they are getting "screen" recordings (AdeptAI for example is doing that with their model, but with a browser only for now). It sounds more like just accompanying natural language descriptions with the fine tuned data is enough to get an improvement. Which makes sense from my limited experience with LLMs.

Should be interesting. I imagine this is for fine tuning GPT4. The "Codex 2.0", better base model (GPT), better instruct tuning probably as well.

Were likely still a number of years away from having practical and useful quantum computers. With that being said, I haven’t seen any substantial evidence which suggests that QM/QC is a requirement/necessity for the development of AGI.

This post is no different than wingeing about cgi effects replacing some practical effects. You are way off base in my opinion. If first gen generative models have taught us anything it's that "human irrationality" is definitely automatable and perhaps it's easier to do than many other seemingly easier tasks.

I know you're being sarcastic but that subreddit is like 50% luddites. Every ai post has the same stupid comment "ai was supposed to take boring jobs, not creative" upvoted to the top. I don't know who promised them that. I suppose they watched movies like "I, Robot" and that's where their perception of creativity/intelligence being impossible for ai comes from. I read a comment there that ai will never be able to replace accountants. Accountants!!!!! There are a few sensible comments but the majority are just nonsense absurdity. They still have in their minds that humans are "special" in some way.

[deleted]

Y'all acting like we have all the time in the world to live, might as well jump on it now before you lose the chance. We've been talking to humans, animals, trees for generations. And now Y'all too fancy for a machine? 🤔