Recent comments in /f/singularity
FranciscoJ1618 t1_j6h0koo wrote
Reply to comment by Superschlenz in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
And free advertisement
Northcliff t1_j6h0ftd wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
>slow walking modeRNA
My sides, this fucking sub
Northcliff t1_j6h05yw wrote
Reply to comment by 28nov2022 in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
(X) Doubt
sneakpeekbot t1_j6gzrkm wrote
Reply to comment by heyimpro in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Gangstalking using the top posts of the year!
#1: “They” are making me think gay thoughts
#2: everyone needs to get a carbon monoxide detector!
#3: Another brave whistleblower and man of integrity. | 23 comments
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^Contact ^^| ^^Info ^^| ^^Opt-out ^^| ^^GitHub
heyimpro t1_j6gzqmz wrote
Reply to comment by Aburath in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
/r/gangstalking is going to have a field day with this one
Sotamiro t1_j6gyq0c wrote
Reply to comment by Phantump4thewin in 7 AI Audio Generation Paper/Updates In Under 15 Days by Pro_RazE
The idea like many technologies is to do better/faster with less efforts
sideways t1_j6gxjug wrote
Reply to comment by Cr4zko in Acceleration is the only way by practical_ussy
Very relevant:
Reedspacer's Lower Bound
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Py3uGnncqXuEfPtQp/interpersonal-entanglement
Akimbo333 t1_j6gwcud wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in The Rise of Automated Robots in the Future of Car Maintenance and Driving by crua9
Hey, my bad. I commented on your post by mistake. I made an edit above lol!
Tall-Junket5151 t1_j6gw5g9 wrote
Reply to How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
This is a very interesting topic for me since I’m a chemical engineer.
The ideal AI would be able to
- Completely simulate all chemical interactions/reactions
- Completely simulate all biochemical processes
- Derive new chemicals and simulate their introduction into the system to address a particular problem
Something like this would be a complete game changer.
In truth the way we discover and synthesis drugs or really any other chemical is rather primitive. Except for simple simulations, we’re still mostly using theories and methods developed a century ago. Basically all drugs are actually based off some sort of chemical that exists in nature, not because it’s the best drugs or chemical to use but because it’s much more practical to use with our current methods. Drugs are really never designed from the ground up because it would be way to impractical to produce, so usually a naturally occurring chemical is used as a foundation and then modified in several steps to get a desired structure. These steps are known organic chemistry mechanisms that cause a specific reaction to happen and are VERY conditional and if any sort of complexity is introduced then some completely different reaction will happen (so if the mechanism of action is nucleophilic substitution and something other than just carbon and hydrogen atoms and a single electrophile is present or the pH is slightly different from your desired range then a completely different reaction might happen). There’s also the issue that these reactions have a specific yield equilibrium cap or known side reactions. So in short with AI we could overcome these limitation by having better designed synthesis techniques, better ability to determine effective drugs, find new ones that are close to impossible to synthesis today, and simulate the entire process instead of the crude testing techniques today (animal testing, human trials, etc...)
crua9 OP t1_j6gvx1x wrote
Reply to comment by Akimbo333 in The Rise of Automated Robots in the Future of Car Maintenance and Driving by crua9
?
This post wasn't about a robot GF. It was about a robotic mechanic in your garage and in the shop.
I mean I 100% think what you are talking about will be a thing. They are already working on making sex dolls have motions and sounds like they breath, make sounds when things happen, and so on. And it has been pretty open that while most aren't open about it. One of the next big money makers will be a robotic wife/husband.
But the post has nothing to do with that.
SurroundSwimming3494 t1_j6gvkgv wrote
Reply to comment by nutidizen in OpenAI has hired an army of contractors to make basic coding obsolete by Buck-Nasty
It likely won't, though. The vast majority of AI/ML researchers think it'll take longer than that, including the most prominent ones.
TheOGCrackSniffer t1_j6gviyy wrote
Reply to comment by gangstasadvocate in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
eh nowadays because of IoT toasters can be very advanced like this
Akimbo333 t1_j6gveos wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in The Rise of Automated Robots in the Future of Car Maintenance and Driving by crua9
Yeah, that'd be interesting! Mechanics cant screw you over and you could 3d print a part for your car and have your robot fix it. But we might not even own cars in the future, we would just be using rideshare. On an unrelated note. No girls to screw you over once you have a robot girlfriend.
[deleted] t1_j6guaq4 wrote
kinetsu_hayabusa t1_j6gsv1j wrote
Shutterstock going bankrupt 10 times faster than Blockbuster
cbterry t1_j6grdgs wrote
coolbreeze770 t1_j6gqz4t wrote
Reply to comment by AccomplishedGift7840 in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
Classic Microsoft tactics.
tesseract2045 t1_j6gqlz9 wrote
Reply to comment by s2ksuch in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
So... are you a russian troll or just a maga idiot? Hard to tell them apart these days.
Pro_RazE OP t1_j6gqcqw wrote
Reply to comment by virgilash in 7 AI Audio Generation Paper/Updates In Under 15 Days by Pro_RazE
Sorry for late reply! My favourite and I think the best public one currently is https://beta.elevenlabs.io/speech-synthesis You can clone your or someone else's voice as well and the results are amazing. Not completely free though, there is a limit.
LoquaciousAntipodean OP t1_j6gplun wrote
Reply to comment by cometparty in Amazing. This subreddit is a total waste of time. by LoquaciousAntipodean
Oh really? Well whining that other people sound 'immature', and being offended by big words, makes you sound about 16, so I'd be careful throwing rocks in that glass house of yours, friend.
I know r/iamverysmart quite well, feel free to post me on there if you want. I'd love to see what it is you think I'm so deluded about.
h20ohno t1_j6gof4i wrote
Reply to comment by throwawaydthrowawayd in My human irrationality is already taking over: as generative AI progresses, I've been growing ever more appreciative of human-made media by Yuli-Ban
Yeah, people do art livestreams and stuff already so I could see a niche for that, in a sense you're creating entertainment (the art), entertaining live viewers and also educating them all at the same time.
CellWithoutCulture t1_j6gnrgy wrote
Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
Is the potato chip thing something really thinks? That subreddit is awesome, thanks for sharing
h20ohno t1_j6gn9gi wrote
Reply to comment by Sandbar101 in Acceleration is the only way by practical_ussy
Nah, we gotta go for those black hole engines, that's the good stuff
Northcliff t1_j6h0mf9 wrote
Reply to comment by anti-nadroj in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
[Removed by Reddit]