Recent comments in /f/singularity

redeggplant01 t1_j6i1v4o wrote

Communism was a political system built upon an economic theory by Marx - https://www.amazon.com/Das-Kapital-Critque-Political-Economy/dp/145388632X

>i think china has more billionaires than the us

No, the US has over 2300 billionaires ... China has just over 500 billioniares

Source : https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/

As to names .. the claim that you know what is communism and a government communist party does not is laughable

−2

CertainMiddle2382 t1_j6i1rkd wrote

The US is a long way from “post scarcity”. It would means goods allocation would not be necessary anymore because all materials needs are more than fulfilled. (Atmospheric O2 is the only current thing with such characteristics I can think of…)

The notion itself is very contentious and hardly even fulfilled even in extremely optimistic science fiction.

My take is that a softer version of it could be achievable through clever manipulation of collective wants and needs through social media.

I think AI could help make aggregate mankind wants much more gentle on hard ressources like helping develop extremely addicting competitive sports or arts/activities so that almost everybody’s attention could be steered towards something more benign…

1

redeggplant01 t1_j6i1fjb wrote

No, The practice of FOSS development is not a political philosophy but rather a business/distribution model.

Libertarianism is not a political ideology designed around a specific business model like FOSS.

It is framework designed to systematically analyze what actions are justifiable (e.g., the initiation of force/coercion versus consensual exchange).

Apples / Oranges

−10

qrayons t1_j6i1e3w wrote

In medical, there's more of a gap between the innovation and the impact in the market (need time for safety testing, etc.). One of the biggest breaks in medicine within the last several years was the solution for protein folding. We still haven't experience the impact of this yet (a tidal wave of new and more effective pharmacological treatments).

1

LyubomirIko t1_j6i0vg2 wrote

Just like the LAION database is nonprofit but actually literally is harmful to the real artists.

AI 5 years ago was a promise that it will replace boring jobs and give the people more time to create art. Currently young people give up their dreams to persue artistic career because of AI.

Meanwhile the replacement of the artist in the visual industry is based on that same nonprofit LAION database. Artists actually cannot help but "contribute" or simply put - be hostages of data scraping algorithms.

1

Silly_Objective_5186 t1_j6i0i5u wrote

3

Frumpagumpus t1_j6i0i4n wrote

Reply to comment by Steven81 in I’m ready by CassidyHouse

> you are your neurons

why does that matter. you go to sleep every night and the cessation of conscioussness doesn't bug you.

People have died for stupider reasons than "I want to create a clone of me that has my values and can clone themselves and possibly shut down their clones if needed such that they can perform tasks in parallel, oh and they also get a massive speedup and don't require nearly as much space or resources and could thus go into space much more easily and can save quite a bit of time on maintenance etc."

its for the cause (though to be clear i am not actively betting that destructive brain uploading will be a thing, more like, even if you had non destructive brain uploading or some ship of theseus stuff or whatever, once you were actually in the computer you would find it VERY VERY convenient to clone yourself. software processes fork all the time, and their children are killed and garbage collected with reckless abandon)

if you were trying to preserve yourself biologically probably the easiest way would be to stick your brain in a jar lol. which i bet a lot of people would also find morally objectionable XD

1

tiny9000 OP t1_j6i0f12 wrote

I highly doubt Microsoft is investing billions of dollars into AI just out of curiosity. Profit does’t exist in a vacuum, some kind of value needs to be provided in-order to gain profit which means there is certainly alot of value in AI. It is a pandora box tho.

1

User1539 t1_j6i0aj1 wrote

It's hard to suggest it's '50% of the way' to AGI when it can't really do any reasoning.

I was playing with its coding skills, and the feeling I got was like talking to a kid that was copying off other kids papers.

It would regularly produce code, then do a summary at the end, and in that summary make factually incorrect statements.

If it can't read its own code, then it's not very reliable, right?

I'm not saying this isn't impressive, or a step on the road toward AGI, but the complete lack of reliable reasoning skills makes it less of an 'intelligence' and more like the shadow of intelligence. Like being able to add large numbers instantly isn't 'thinking', and calculators do it far better than humans, but we wouldn't call a calculator intelligence.

We'll see where it goes. I've seen some videos and papers I'm more impressed with than LLMs lately. People are definitely building systems with reasoning skills.

We may be 50% of the way, but I don't feel that LLMs represent that on their own.

2

Silly_Objective_5186 t1_j6i08vh wrote

“Depending on how you want to think about it, it was funny or inevitable or symbolic that the robotic takeover did not start at MIT, NASA, Microsoft or Ford. It started at a Burger-G restaurant…”

https://marshallbrain.com/manna1

4