Recent comments in /f/singularity

bacchusbastard t1_j6njhjr wrote

Money will turn into luxury credits in about 20 years. People will contribute based on need/aspiration/and reward.

We'll all be fine for the most part but will need to do some community service at least if you want to afford a playstation 10 or whatever.

Food, education, and healthcare will all be free, aside from ivy league schools or special free market food stuffs. The free market may resemble more of a barter system or could just exchange luxury tokens.

4

footurist t1_j6nj7dx wrote

Actually, because of a lack of a real commonly agreed upon understanding of what makes general intelligence there is a tiny chance a loner might crack the problem. It's quite unlikely though.

The sewer scenario might happen after the singularity, though, once the core problem is solved and individuals are tinkering away at small projects for various purposes...

1

dasnihil t1_j6niu4e wrote

we will soon be desensitized to "art" as we know it today in various forms: drawing/painting, music, literature etc

you mentioned "print" as a technology but you're discounting the fact that we're talking about a different beast here. a beast that can bring your imagination to life and wow you.

isn't art something that wows the audience and takes them places? and if a machine generated thing is coherent enough to paint our imagination for us, do you get where we're headed now?

art as we know today will be understood better by future humans, just like we now understand religion and human constructs way better than even Nietzche did during his time. when he said "god is dead" it was shocking and profound, now we're all like "yeah god is dead who gives a shit".

humans have a peculiar way of finding new constructs and making it a trend. a few of us see that, rest are just discussing art like it was not a human construct and as if the universe has a thing like "art" in there lol.

3

s2ksuch t1_j6nidz8 wrote

2

Sigura83 t1_j6neqyr wrote

>I and my engineers are abandoning so-called ”black box” algorithms such as neural networks in favor of the new generations of predictive models that can be much more easily interpreted by trained human ML engineers

NNs have been rocking it for the past few years, so this is what surprised me the most. The rest is fairly humdrum

4

californiarepublik t1_j6nel46 wrote

Hilarious that your reasonable, politely-worded post has been downvoted to zero. I agree with you, for this and other reasons, but it doesn't seem a very popular opinion on this sub and I'm not quite sure why. Posters here seem to take delight in the idea of people's jobs being eliminated and Skynet taking over, not sure the appeal. Many fantasize about UBI while forgetting the real 'alignment problem' between elite classes and the rest of society...

4

Political_Target t1_j6nbhon wrote

One thing to watch for with these language models is they can be made to say anything. Especially with a service that has broken with it's original purpose such as OpenAI, is that these language models can be trained on generated text from a similar AI language model. What they can do (and already do in my opinion) is generate bunches of text saying something to the same effect, such as "the sky is yellow", in many different variations. Then when the language model is trained on this generated text it will learn to say that the sky is yellow.

The fact is these things don't actually "know" human language, they use a lot of math to come up with their responses. The math is what's fine-tuned during the training.

3

StatisticianFuzzy327 OP t1_j6nbdrz wrote

Thank you very much. That makes sense. I'll make sure to train myself in the mathematical sciences, and seriously consider delaying working on the biosciences until later in my career while building my expertise and establishing a solid foundation in the mathematical tools and techniques that I could apply to the life sciences.

I also agree with what you said about psychology being a lost cause due to being very subjective, and I myself think that it needs stronger biological roots to have any credibility, but I never considered that seriously the idea that biology itself might require the application of mathematical tools to develop it more rigorously and extract general principle that are universally true.

I had some suspicions, but I had never come across such a perspective, so thank you once again for sharing your thoughts. I'll give it significant weight while making important career decisions in the near future.

2

searlasob t1_j6nawjr wrote

It shouldn't have to be so black and white though (corporate overlords or cyberpunks in sewers). Why can't OpenAi actually look after their Kenyan workers? Why can't they, as their name says, be more transparent in the running of their organization? They'll probably rename themselves shutai once the singularity comes hehehe

1