Recent comments in /f/singularity
bacchusbastard t1_j6njhjr wrote
Reply to comment by fignewtgingrich in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Money will turn into luxury credits in about 20 years. People will contribute based on need/aspiration/and reward.
We'll all be fine for the most part but will need to do some community service at least if you want to afford a playstation 10 or whatever.
Food, education, and healthcare will all be free, aside from ivy league schools or special free market food stuffs. The free market may resemble more of a barter system or could just exchange luxury tokens.
footurist t1_j6nj7dx wrote
Reply to comment by Primo2000 in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
Actually, because of a lack of a real commonly agreed upon understanding of what makes general intelligence there is a tiny chance a loner might crack the problem. It's quite unlikely though.
The sewer scenario might happen after the singularity, though, once the core problem is solved and individuals are tinkering away at small projects for various purposes...
dasnihil t1_j6niu4e wrote
Reply to comment by alakeya in I don’t think that artists will be doomed with AI by alakeya
we will soon be desensitized to "art" as we know it today in various forms: drawing/painting, music, literature etc
you mentioned "print" as a technology but you're discounting the fact that we're talking about a different beast here. a beast that can bring your imagination to life and wow you.
isn't art something that wows the audience and takes them places? and if a machine generated thing is coherent enough to paint our imagination for us, do you get where we're headed now?
art as we know today will be understood better by future humans, just like we now understand religion and human constructs way better than even Nietzche did during his time. when he said "god is dead" it was shocking and profound, now we're all like "yeah god is dead who gives a shit".
humans have a peculiar way of finding new constructs and making it a trend. a few of us see that, rest are just discussing art like it was not a human construct and as if the universe has a thing like "art" in there lol.
superluminary t1_j6nit5n wrote
Reply to comment by TheDavidMichaels in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
Who trusts the guy who spent 36 billion fighting malaria and building clean toilets and schools in Africa?
s2ksuch t1_j6nidz8 wrote
Reply to comment by SpecialMembership in Andrew Moore is the head of AI at Google Cloud and the former dean of the Carnegie Mellon School of Engineering in Pittsburgh, where he has been at work on the big questions of AI for more than 20 years. Here he shares his vision for some of what we can expect over the next 10. by alfredo70000
I remember when AMD stock as like $1 thinking they were done when they had their bulldozer processors sucking wind to intel. Then Ryzen came out and the stock went on a roar
fresh_mootz t1_j6nhnal wrote
Where the hell can I watch it?
despod t1_j6nhdaj wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Sports. That is probably the safest career bet out there.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_j6ngd88 wrote
Reply to comment by scapestrat0 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
There's no time to waste with some people. You learn that some people are natural saboteurs who stand in the way. They will never change, it'll always come out of them.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ngajl wrote
Reply to comment by DesperateProblem7418 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
This could be the least scientific most absurd post Ive seen this morning, great job. Youre just spewing a bunch of nonsense generalizations about young people you saw on fox news.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ng711 wrote
Reply to comment by CrispinMK in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Social activity starts with your parents so unless those babies grow up in isolation, which is possible, they will always seek interaction. Not to mention digital interaction IS interaction. Some of my longest friends are people Ive ve met online.
AvgAIbot t1_j6ng1y2 wrote
This is a business, not a couple of programmers in a basement. They have employees to pay, server costs, etc.
If anything this is good news, their work will continue and will progress.
The world is capitalistic, like it or not.
illathon t1_j6nfudc wrote
They got a ton of nice smart people and tricked them into believing they were actually developing something that would be open.
im-so-stupid-lol OP t1_j6nfeff wrote
Reply to comment by Baturinsky in Prompt engineering by im-so-stupid-lol
can I try out that model online on that website if I make an account?
Carl_The_Sagan t1_j6nf1kr wrote
It’s only popular because it’s free now. If they paywall it people will move elsewhere. Every major tech company is working on something similar, it’s it not there now, they will catch up in a few months / years
Sigura83 t1_j6neqyr wrote
Reply to Andrew Moore is the head of AI at Google Cloud and the former dean of the Carnegie Mellon School of Engineering in Pittsburgh, where he has been at work on the big questions of AI for more than 20 years. Here he shares his vision for some of what we can expect over the next 10. by alfredo70000
>I and my engineers are abandoning so-called ”black box” algorithms such as neural networks in favor of the new generations of predictive models that can be much more easily interpreted by trained human ML engineers
NNs have been rocking it for the past few years, so this is what surprised me the most. The rest is fairly humdrum
californiarepublik t1_j6nel46 wrote
Hilarious that your reasonable, politely-worded post has been downvoted to zero. I agree with you, for this and other reasons, but it doesn't seem a very popular opinion on this sub and I'm not quite sure why. Posters here seem to take delight in the idea of people's jobs being eliminated and Skynet taking over, not sure the appeal. Many fantasize about UBI while forgetting the real 'alignment problem' between elite classes and the rest of society...
Alex_1729 t1_j6nekd6 wrote
You can't save the world without money.
grimorg80 t1_j6ndr43 wrote
Almost like, bear with me on this.. almost like we live in capitalism.
LoneRedWolf24 t1_j6nd9l4 wrote
Reply to A.I TIMELINE by Aze_Avora
Indie boom in games and film
Political_Target t1_j6nbhon wrote
One thing to watch for with these language models is they can be made to say anything. Especially with a service that has broken with it's original purpose such as OpenAI, is that these language models can be trained on generated text from a similar AI language model. What they can do (and already do in my opinion) is generate bunches of text saying something to the same effect, such as "the sky is yellow", in many different variations. Then when the language model is trained on this generated text it will learn to say that the sky is yellow.
The fact is these things don't actually "know" human language, they use a lot of math to come up with their responses. The math is what's fine-tuned during the training.
StatisticianFuzzy327 OP t1_j6nbdrz wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in Students planning for career relevant to Singularity? by StatisticianFuzzy327
Thank you very much. That makes sense. I'll make sure to train myself in the mathematical sciences, and seriously consider delaying working on the biosciences until later in my career while building my expertise and establishing a solid foundation in the mathematical tools and techniques that I could apply to the life sciences.
I also agree with what you said about psychology being a lost cause due to being very subjective, and I myself think that it needs stronger biological roots to have any credibility, but I never considered that seriously the idea that biology itself might require the application of mathematical tools to develop it more rigorously and extract general principle that are universally true.
I had some suspicions, but I had never come across such a perspective, so thank you once again for sharing your thoughts. I'll give it significant weight while making important career decisions in the near future.
searlasob t1_j6nawjr wrote
Reply to comment by Primo2000 in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
It shouldn't have to be so black and white though (corporate overlords or cyberpunks in sewers). Why can't OpenAi actually look after their Kenyan workers? Why can't they, as their name says, be more transparent in the running of their organization? They'll probably rename themselves shutai once the singularity comes hehehe
TFenrir t1_j6natgl wrote
Should be interesting to see how well this works. I was reading a Twitter thread from someone who worked on some of the progenitor technology to this and they weren't confident it would be anywhere near as accurate as claimed - this will be our first demo
Bakagami- t1_j6n9t8e wrote
Reply to comment by coumineol in ChatGPT Content Detector Launched By Stanford University by vadhavaniyafaijan
Exceptionally slutty.
tongboy t1_j6njm5c wrote
Reply to comment by Primo2000 in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
Anyone remember seti@home?