Ye their new thing is supposed to be "Sparrow" from what I heard, will see if it's any good whenever it's out. The issue of the difficulty of censorship seems to be present in all LLM models.

Yep

yeah, look at this handsome fella i met https://i.imgur.com/0fsMOv2.jpg

walking around this area late night was something.

It's about no longer needing them. Today chat gtp still can't fact check. So you still need a person to find out.

google's engineers came up with the algorithm that makes gpt-* possible. they have several alternative network architectures that have their own strengths and weaknesses.

google is well aware of chatgpt taking marketshare but they're eyeing on something bigger, considering almost every household has their smart assistants and devices. i know how far ahead google thinks. i've done engineering for them.

Yep. Especially at that low accuracy, There can be alternative interventions (e.g. resubmission). And perhaps even secondary backup checks. hopefully the detection methods can improve although it is a moving target….

Ultimately it’s better for universities to hire more faculty and look to evaluation methods that are better for students and can’t just be replicated by AI

there are other subs that specialize in both kinds of the posts you are talking about, between the two the technical oriented ones are probably more active actually lol. if you want to find them just cyberstalk power users around here.

But being a world dictator is not an economic problem. Living in a simulation is the best why to achieve this.

Lol 80 grand in school debt. Try 150.

C'mon nobody cares about sculpture

I don't either! I'm a full time artist. Ai can't do what I do.

Agreed. Some form of debt is okay especially for high earning fields but shouldn’t be as wild as it is now. Some people’s lives are harmed by debt, and research shows people are psychologically maturing slower. At least there are some pathways for forgiveness.

Where did I even say it was “singularity tech” lol. Still ignoring what I said too. Ignoring and putting words in my mouth. You just kept weird describing it as “a conveyor belt”. Fuck off. Fucking Reddit midwits honestly.

Good thing no one gives a fuck about poetry

They're such powerfully sensual animals.

But what about the people that don’t use ChatGPT or they use Grammarly and the algorithm says they have a 70% match, then what? Make them redo the assignment? How is that fair?

Then what I gave you as a prompt, would reduce the detection from the algorithm to 0% so your point is flawed in the fact most of these detect ChatGPT software/sites are open to the public rather than a proprietary one only academia has access to.

Per openai ceo, humans adapted to using calculators in class, this will be true with ChatGPT.

Is it? There is a new Google robot (last couple months) that uses LLMs to help build its instructions for how to complete tasks. The sequence generated by the LLM becomes the actions it should take. The language sequence generation determines behavior.

There was also someone on Twitter (last week) who linked chatGPT to external tools and the Internet. This allowed it to solve a problem interactively, using the LLM as the central planner and decision maker. Again here, the language sequence generation determines behavior.

Aside fron these, alignment is the problem of controlling behavior, and behavior is a sequence. The rules and tricks discovered for controlling language sequences maybe can help us understand how to control the larger behavior sequence.

Mostly just thinking aloud. Maybe I'm just dumb, since everyone here in the comments seems to have the opposite opinion of mine, but what do we make of the two above LLM use cases where LLMs determine the behavior?

I’d love to be a fly on the wall at their headquarters. They’re gonna have to release the genie soon.

Half of the sub is kool-aid. Could be misremembering, but a similar post that covered this was well upvoted recently. I believe they were saying there will be greater appreciation for human-touched endeavors, just as there is the rise of etsy and so forth.

I agree with you. Artists will adapt. A lot of their art will be fueled by AI, AI used as a tool. What is currently recognized as AI art will be even more recognizeable as machine/AI-based in the future as human artists evolve with AI. Sort of like how trained ears can recognize autotune. Of course, I am only talking about near term future - too hard to say about the far.

Another point. AI is already used in a lot of interactive or simulation art. The humans are using AI to create new forms of art that AI cannot create on its own. Of course, in singularity, that could change, but people in this sub are underestimating what real singularity is.

I also agree with the statements on biology (lab drudgery, imprecise, jobs) and psychology (imprecise, jobs) here by certainmiddle. If you want to understand and build AI or other related technologies, I'd avoid making these two fields your main area of study.

Other companies are way more open than open ai, comprised evilt things like Facebook and google... Openai is it really the bottom level

It showed it's cards long time ago

Yeah...that's not how it works.

I doubt it. This will make coders far more productive, but there will still need to be people who know how to translate the real world application into a prompt, and then check the code to ensure it does what you need. I foresee more of a shift to field work.

It's really bad thinking, and futile in the longer run.