>As you mentioned yourself, an AGI would not have human considerations. Why would it inherently care about rules and the law.

That's not what I said or meant. You're taking things to the extremes.. It'll neither be a cold logical single-minded machine nor a human with human ambitions and desires. It'll be somewhere inbetween, and neither at the same time. In a digital system, we can be selective about what functions we include and exclude. And if it's going to be of use to us, it will be designed to interact with us, understand us, and socialize with us. And it doesn't need to care about rules and laws, just obey them. Computers themselves are rule-based machines, and this won't change with AGI. We're just adding cognitive functions on top to imbue it with the ability to understand things the way we do, and use that to aid us in our objectives. There's no reason it would develop it's own objectives unless designed that way.

But I get it, there's always going to be a risk of malfunction. Researchers are aware of this, and many people are working on safety. The risk should be quite minimal, but yes you can always argue there will be risks. I still think that the bigger risk in all of this is people, and their potential for misusing AGI.

Yeah it's obvious every big company is looking at AI, most experimenting with it or more.

same here

No. My company is already looking into it and they are serious.

Seems like this would make a company’s customer service bots massively better. So many of them are terrible.

I’m curious how the field of conversation designing bots moves forward.

He posed the question as if there was doubt as to whether major business escorts would be going all in on AI. I'm responding to that doubt. One of the most conservative moving tech companies, Microsoft, is already 10billion plus in on OpenAI.

An investment arms race is already underway.

Not to mention the need for unicorns to bouy the casino we call Wall St. Get ready for perhaps the biggest bubble we've ever seen.

if anything ai will read up about humans after we have passed and maybe bring us back from some frozen genetics. so i say that’s a win for the species if done correctly. thanks future ai if you can read this..

or venture far out into deep space in hopes of finding a suitable host for our species. the imagination is where spirit touches future realities

I predict that soon VCs will start investing in AI, and that press will start covering the developments as well.

Investors. Look at the coal industry, or oil. Collateral damage is acceptable for financial gain. Board rooms are a safe place to make callused decisions.

I talked to Bella Porch and she told me this was "Build-a-Bitch". Completely unplayable.

Wide-adoption of this would near automate a few people I work with on a daily basis

Investors

The same is true for OpenAI's 20 dollar premium plan. If a small startup like you.com can make a working service, It won't be long for every major internet company from Naver to Yandex to Amazon to even freaking Yahoo to roll out their own, for free.

This 20 dollar premium access is temporary.

You're joking, right?

As you mentioned yourself, an AGI would not have human considerations. Why would it inherently care about rules and the law.

From our experience with AI systems, the shortest route to the result is what an AI optimises for, and if something is physically allowed it will be considered. Even if you think something is unlikely, it only has to happen once for it to be a problem.

Considering that humans have tried to take over the world, and they had all the same issues around the need to follow rules etc they are obviously not a real barrier.

In conclusion, even if you think something is very unlikely, this does not mean the risk is not real. Of something happens once in a million times it likely happens several times per day on our planet

Falls under image editting AI.

Lets see IF they can survive the chat Ai integration into Bing.com

Microsoft is working double shifts to activate chat AI before Google does.

You.com is so far the only one who did a free public Ai chat.

This will be it. at least in our lifetime and our kids.

This is much like the paperclip scenario, it's unrealistic and incomplete. Do you really think a human-level AGI or an ASI would just accept one simple goal and operate independently from there? You think it wouldn't be smart enough to clarify things before proceeding, even if it did operate independently? Do you think it wouldn't consider the consequences of extreme actions? Would it not consider options that work within the system rather than against it? And you act like taking over the world is a practical goal that it would come up with, but is it practical to you? If it wants to make an omelette, the most likely options will come up first, like checking for eggs, and if there aren't any then go buy some, because it will understand the world that it inhabits and will know to adhere to laws and rules. If it ignores them, then it will ignore goals as well, and just not do anything.

[deleted]

Maybe not AI in and of themselves but I use these frequently in training.

BIRME - bulk image resizing and cropping

PhotoRoom - free tool to remove background

Wouldn’t the world just become a post human world? Maybe we’re at the end times now, leading up to our Gods birth. Once our minds connect and we sink into a hive mind, all will know peace.

Yeah I think so

Particularly on mobile, your sidebar, the story summary, and the ad for artifact all kinda blur together it was jarring.

I'm a fan of card interfaces, it tells me what text and titles go with what links and summaries.

I've got some less hand holdy filtery responses with You.com

They've also got some interesting widgets to play around with as well. I appreciate they're trying to do something different.

I wouldn't worry about chatGPT.

Language abilities != Thinking