Recent comments in /f/singularity
Haplo_dk t1_j71fug6 wrote
At what temperature does this function?
Surur t1_j71ch6f wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
Imagine however if the main effect of the upgrade would be to stop wishing for those things.
Quealdlor t1_j71c66p wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
For now, I just want IQ 145-150, better control over my emotions, behaviour, memories and a sturdier, unaging body. I used to have IQ 120, but depression lowered it to 100. I am wiser, but also not as smart or quick as I would like to be. I've been trying to learn juggling since 2011 and failed every time. I am also unable to ever reach the 1st place on the hardest difficulty racing games. I would like to be more creative and for my back to stop hurting. You know, mostly basic stuff. Not some crazy extreme posthuman stuff. If these wishes were granted, then I would feel better and be better. I could live like that for a century.
monsieurpooh t1_j71aba4 wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in ChatGPT Passes US Medical Licensing Exams Without Cramming by RareGur3157
That is true for a lot of jobs. Go to a software engineering interview at a typical big company. Compare the skills you need for the job vs the ones you're being tested for. Very little overlap.
Akimbo333 t1_j71a93n wrote
Soft-Flamingo6003 OP t1_j71a8ot wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Aright but how far is willing willing to take this logic. Don’t want to get harassed on the street? Don’t go out into the street. Don’t want to get catcalled? Wear a burqa. Putting the burden of the abuse onto the victim rather than the perverts isn’t the way to go.
P.s I’m not in America (for the vote blue comment). I’m from a 3rd world society in a still patriarchal country. I do identify left.
monsieurpooh t1_j71a647 wrote
Reply to comment by em_goldman in ChatGPT Passes US Medical Licensing Exams Without Cramming by RareGur3157
I don't think the AI needs nor recognizes the distinction between the emotional vs logical side; it's just optimized for a task, and there's no theoretical limitation from it being optimized for de-escalation given enough time, training data and perhaps robot body if necessary
AmputatorBot t1_j7121cp wrote
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.
Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://phys.org/news/2023-01-superconductivity-magic-angle-graphene.html
^(I'm a bot | )^(Why & About)^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)
Mrkvitko t1_j710hws wrote
Reply to comment by Ragondux in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Which will give you nothing. It won't prove the video is a deepfake or not. Not to mention you're unlikely to do the verification by yourselves (generally, each time video is uploaded somewhere it is recompressed which changes its checksum). So you're relying on some "trustworthy institution" anyways.
In that case, you can drop the blockchain and just check what the institution says.
GayHitIer t1_j70yexh wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in Do you know of any promising clinical trials going on right now? by Phoenix5869
Yeah, but it's nothing special it was only reversing some small things with intermittent fasting and small dose of sens.
What we will get in the upcoming decades will make this look like child's play.
When we have people living to 150-200+ We will have reached LEV, but for now just eat healthy exercise and keep your mental in check.
Neuralink imo is gonna speed everything up even more with fast access to the internet through your mind.
People will enhance their Neurocortex and become much smarter and have much more knowledge.
2029, 2036, 2045 is gonna be some insane milestones.
Nick Bostrom thinks we will have ASI very soon like around 2030-2040 with over 50%.
Phoenix5869 OP t1_j70xy8i wrote
Reply to comment by RowKiwi in Do you know of any promising clinical trials going on right now? by Phoenix5869
Anything
Phoenix5869 OP t1_j70xwzs wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in Do you know of any promising clinical trials going on right now? by Phoenix5869
Human trials for senolytics? Idk if thats been done before but thats huge news. One of the main issues with longevity trials on mice is that it wasnt done on humans and so we dont know if itl work on humans.
XGatsbyX t1_j70xl7k wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Duh
GayHitIer t1_j70xkz3 wrote
Neuralink is getting human trials this year, with Elon Musk getting one himself.
Sensolytics are getting more trials with mouses, apes and few safe human trials.
RowKiwi t1_j70vpaw wrote
Clinical trials of what?
Spire_Citron t1_j70vb88 wrote
Reply to comment by Ragondux in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
It's not just people believing they're real that causes harm, though. Having pornography made of you against your will victimises people in and of itself even if everyone knows it's not real. Everyone knew the deep fake porn videos in the latest incident weren't real, but it was still deeply upsetting for the women whose likenesses were used to find out it had been going on.
Ragondux t1_j70tjs4 wrote
Reply to comment by Mrkvitko in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Sure, there will be a need to trust the source, but you can still have some level of proof. Imagine that some politician says something horrible on camera. Then he decides to claim it's a deepfake. Using a blockchain you could prove that the video existed at a given date and had been claimed true by MSNBC, for example.
It's not great but I think it's the best we can do in the near future.
Ragondux t1_j70t26x wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
People will still want them, but hopefully they won't destroy someone's life.
Spire_Citron t1_j70rpr4 wrote
Reply to comment by nicka163 in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Until it becomes something anyone can do with no effort. Sure, it's been possible for a long time, but the barrier of entry was so high that who would bother?
Spire_Citron t1_j70rlcz wrote
Reply to comment by Smellz_Of_Elderberry in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
I don't think people will ever just get used to and be cool with people putting them in pornography against their will. Maybe the people consuming it won't think anything of it, but the people who are victimised by it sure will.
Spire_Citron t1_j70rcr9 wrote
Reply to comment by XGatsbyX in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
It doesn't stop the harm, though. Being put in porn against your will is horrifying even if it isn't real.
Spire_Citron t1_j70r8qy wrote
Reply to comment by Ragondux in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
The thing is that the possibility that the sex tapes are fake won't make people lose interest because there were people who were paying for those fakes to be made. They don't care that it's fake, they just want custom porn of a particular person.
Spire_Citron t1_j70r0nt wrote
Reply to comment by jeffkeeg in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
Just because it's been around for that long doesn't mean it hasn't improved, become more accessible, started being used more, etc.
crua9 t1_j70o455 wrote
Reply to comment by em_goldman in ChatGPT Passes US Medical Licensing Exams Without Cramming by RareGur3157
Based on 3, I'm assuming you are agreeing with me that it is pure BS. The hands on is needed. But forcing them to take stupid things like art or whatever that has nothing to do with the job is BS money making crap with the excuse of "well rounded".
​
As far as your first part. IDK if AI should teach doctors yet. Like eventually I think robots will have to be good enough for the basics. I imagine at some point, any humanoid robot you have in your house will double as bottom level medical care. Like they are good for finding if there is a problem, dealing with cuts, and so on. Not so much with fixing a broken bone or whatever.
But at some point it will have to be better and adapt. I don't think we are anywhere near this.
​
Anyways, I can see at some point nurses and doctors being complete replaced by robots in many areas. Like there is 2 options.
Option 1: Many hospitals, homes, etc will have humanoid robot. A human doctor can remote in through the robot and control it, feel, hear, etc as if the doctor is there. Maybe even smell depending on if the hardware allows for it or there is some brain implant in the doctor.
Anyways, this makes it where the person can be at home, a hotel, or even the moon. And the doctor can interact with the person as if they are there.
​
Option 2: The AI will keep getting better and better to the point where human doctors will be obsolete.
​
​
Both cases, your job is safe. But there will be a time where just like truck drivers today can see it with self driving around the corner. The ones driving today are likely the last generation in that career.
captainjake9 OP t1_j71hada wrote
Reply to comment by Bakagami- in How long do you guys think it’s going to be before the eleven labs speech synthesiser source code gets leaked? by captainjake9
This might be mind bogglingly surprising to you but shit leak’s literally all the time.