Recent comments in /f/singularity
[deleted] t1_j7en9hc wrote
Reply to What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
[deleted]
tatleoat t1_j7en7rr wrote
Reply to What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
I'd get a loan and pay whatever it took for something like 1 but with better language capabilities and task execution capabilities (do not give a shit about how it looks or if it has sex). I'd pay 100k for something like that
Superschlenz t1_j7e842g wrote
Reply to comment by proclamo in Major leak reveals revolutionary new version of Microsoft Bing powered by ChatGPT-4 AI by Phoenix5869
...where the leaker also has internal information about a waitinglist ;-)
Full_Ad2934 t1_j7e4rsq wrote
Reply to Major leak reveals revolutionary new version of Microsoft Bing powered by ChatGPT-4 AI by Phoenix5869
More AI hype for people who don’t know what they are talking about.
The improvements are going to be minimal until it’s able to access the internet and that’s not happening without a shitload of lawsuits for both OpenAI and MS.
https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-ceo-people-will-be-disappointed-gpt4
Superschlenz t1_j7e422z wrote
Species-appropriate husbandry.
Beneficial_Yogurt_22 t1_j7d49u6 wrote
So the biggest threat is just generally draining the system of money. So the more money a program can drain from the entire system the more land they can afford to buy. Making everything else have less breathing room to function in.
Basically assuming we don't let AI just consume all the land then they'll be fine. Doing what you always did will always work assuming no externals change.
Of course externals are always changing and I think ai is going to have profound implications on what capitalism even means.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j7cfjsm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Future of The Lower and Middle Class Post-Singularity, and Why You Should Worry. by ttylyl
…you can’t search the internet or think about expenses companies incur daily? I’ll give you one, cost of goods sold.
You’re being intentionally obtuse because you realize you’re wrong. Like I said initially, companies need money to function.
[deleted] t1_j7c4am8 wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in Future of The Lower and Middle Class Post-Singularity, and Why You Should Worry. by ttylyl
[deleted]
TerrryBuckhart t1_j7c2mv3 wrote
Reply to comment by 94746382926 in Should ChatGPT Screenshots be Banned? (Petition) by 94746382926
Very true!
I also misred your Heading. (Didn’t realize it was about the screenshots)
94746382926 OP t1_j7bxri5 wrote
Reply to comment by TerrryBuckhart in Should ChatGPT Screenshots be Banned? (Petition) by 94746382926
I have no problem with the tech being used. In fact I think it's exciting and everyone should use it if it benefits them. I just don't care to see screenshots everytime someone inputs a prompt they think is interesting lol. It'd be like if when smartphones came out I posted screenshots of everytime I found a new app I thought was cool or something.
TerrryBuckhart t1_j7bvsdi wrote
As disruptive this is going to be, there is no point in being some sort of anti-technology luddite.
Hopefully these tools are decentralized enough that they will be accessible to everyone evenly though…
Although I doubt that ends up being the case.
sediba-edud-eht t1_j7btcon wrote
They will be just fine, I have Amish friends believe it or not
Frumpagumpus t1_j7bm6rk wrote
Reply to comment by ComplicitSnake34 in What will happen to the Amish people when the singularity happens? by uswhole
i think your worst case scenario is actually the best case scenario but I dont think you've really put much thought or justification into some of the properties you think that scenario will have.
I harp on these points in like every other comment, but here we go again...
> hive mind
no, the importance of data locality to computation means intelligence and especially self awareness will be NECESSARILY distributed, however, the extreme speedup in communication/thinking, maybe a million times faster, MIGHT (maybe probably would) mean that to humans, it would seem like a hive mind.
> the Ai could easily determine which minds are to be erased
my take is that post human intelligences will intentionally copy and erase themselves because it is convenient to do so. Human take on life and death is a cultural value associated with our brains being anchored to our bodies.
my guess would be that most of this copying and erasing would occur under one's own will. Obviously computer viruses would become analogous to a much much more dangerous version of modern biological viruses. However if I had to bet, while bad stuff would happen I would bet it would happen at a rate less than bad stuff currently happens at a population level in our society (any given individual would be much less likely to die in an accident or disaster).
gangstasadvocate t1_j7bk56c wrote
Reply to comment by ComplicitSnake34 in What will happen to the Amish people when the singularity happens? by uswhole
Gang gang I’m hoping and advocating for the first outcome with the psychedelic exploration
Crypt0n0ob t1_j7bivpq wrote
Reply to comment by Durabys in What will happen to the Amish people when the singularity happens? by uswhole
Silence human. You will know when it’s time for you to know.
[deleted] t1_j7bi851 wrote
[deleted]
Puzzleheaded_Pop_743 t1_j7bha9w wrote
Reply to Major leak reveals revolutionary new version of Microsoft Bing powered by ChatGPT-4 AI by Phoenix5869
Hopefully it is better than https://www.perplexity.ai/
I asked this site yesterday how long it takes for a blister to form in the mouth (I got one after eating salty crackers, it literally took minutes) and it told me it took more than a week...
DeltaV-Mzero t1_j7bamyk wrote
They are actually a model for where the general population will head long term, if we are at least allowed enough land to live on.
Most humans won’t have anything to offer the capital / property owners in terms of labor value
Which means they don’t get paid, and can’t buy things
Which kicks the ladder out from under nearly every worker industry, they’re all built to make money from consumers
What’s left after the economy evaporates will be automated, vertical supply chains feeding the whims of the very elite rich.
The rest of us will have no way to participate, nothing of value to trade. But there’ll be so many of us that a new, entirely separate, unregulated economy will form.
It’ll be based around subsistence and low tech survival, as it’ll have to function on materials which the elite capital class have no interest in.
So…. With or without the religious angle, a good life will look a lot like an Amish life
[deleted] t1_j7b8fma wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in Major leak reveals revolutionary new version of Microsoft Bing powered by ChatGPT-4 AI by Phoenix5869
[deleted]
Smellz_Of_Elderberry t1_j7b2kd1 wrote
Reply to comment by ComplicitSnake34 in What will happen to the Amish people when the singularity happens? by uswhole
My favorite book on this subject is blindsight by Peter watts. It predicts many different sects of mankind, some chose simply to enter a state where their brains are in a permanent state of extreme meditation, then go into stasis. They were the remnants of meditative culture.
Smellz_Of_Elderberry t1_j7b21sh wrote
Reply to comment by crap_punchline in What will happen to the Amish people when the singularity happens? by uswhole
They will inherit the earth after we all upload our brains into the matrix.
Indianianite t1_j7aysjt wrote
They’ll use the tech just like the rest of us unless their elders are around.
headypete42033 t1_j7axupi wrote
I think the Amish are very important with the singularity. We almost need two parrallel societies where one doesnt have electricity. Half way want to become Amish soon to wait out the crazy future and jump in if and when the time becomes right.
I also think its important for us to get into permaculture, and create food forests and not be dependable too much for our food supply,
throwaway764586893 t1_j7arark wrote
They will be persuaded by the AI in one nanosecond they were all wrong all along.
crua9 OP t1_j7ennrc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
You're viewing it as a person. I mean I get your point, but it is something we made. We could just as equally make it where it hates us.
​
Now with that being said, I understand where you are coming from. But I don't purely agree with you. If you apply that type of logic, many things break down. Like the age. Lets say it was made 3 years ago. Is it 3 years old, or is it 3,000 years old when you add up all the other robots and some mass server somewhere which is a major part of the brain.
I do imagine when we get to that point everything will be different, and most anyone reading this will be long dead.