Recent comments in /f/singularity
cloudrunner69 t1_j7khl04 wrote
Reply to comment by diener1 in 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Supposedly from microscopic organisms hanging around underwater hydrothermal vents.
Evil_Patriarch t1_j7kfy3b wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Oh boy soon it will be another front page sub where 90% of the posts are political bullshit that isn't even related to the singularity!
dasnihil t1_j7kfjqo wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
yay more depressed people looking for a coping mechanism that doesn't sound too absurd.
diener1 t1_j7kfiil wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
What did it originate from?
LaukkuPaukku t1_j7kcmdm wrote
Ginkotree48 t1_j7kc6kg wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in You.com released v2 of YouChat, adding multimedia content to their chat-based search by quanik_314
Alright thanks
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_j7kblef wrote
10K LoC? Sure if someone writes hundreds of supporting toolkits for that first. My friend Fred says that the pseudo code for better LLMs is just a few lines:
- Use AI to generate candidate rules like P(People eat sandwiches) >> P(Sandwiches eat people)
- Hire lots of humans. Get them to process the data from 1 and produce rules like P(Sandwiches eat people) = 0.
- Feed the rules to the AI of rule 1
So let's say that you need one cent for each rule for a total of billion rules. With a thousand workers each producing 100K rules a year... It's doable for a billionaire. And you need seven similar schemes for other types of data. However I think AGI is not feasible in a decade. The hardware, software, data, and algorithms are not ready yet.
Kafke t1_j7k9x39 wrote
Reply to comment by Ginkotree48 in You.com released v2 of YouChat, adding multimedia content to their chat-based search by quanik_314
You can literally just use the you.com website without logging in...
Kafke t1_j7k9v29 wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in You.com released v2 of YouChat, adding multimedia content to their chat-based search by quanik_314
I'm using you.com/chat as my primary default search engine now. AFAIK they are indeed just blowing money to get users. Though they do have a few paid services (none of which I use tbh).
I have adblock/trackblock so I can't say how they are on that front other than their claims/promises...
NanditoPapa t1_j7k8vz1 wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
Plenty of ways to shift forms so as the tasks change so does the robot. A tentacle with short phalanges could be more useful in more situations that a simple thumb.
NanditoPapa t1_j7k8q93 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Ask_994 in What is the price point you would be OK with buying a humanoid robot for personal use? by crua9
Plenty of non-humanoid shapes would fit perfectly in our everyday lives. A sphere with tentacles could drive a car. Just seems pointless to limit ourselves to such a degree. The form should fit the function, not the other way around.
alexiuss t1_j7k8i5n wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in What Large Language Models (LLMs) mean for the -near- future, from Search to Chatbots to personal Assistants. Some of my thoughts, predictions and hopes - and I would love to hear yours. by TFenrir
You're way off, dawg. Amazon is evil and can force it's employees into doing whatever for their work hours, but the world isn't amazon.
I don't think that chatgpt stores any of its questions unless you use their main site and even then the AI can only recall a certain number of lines at best.
Using chatgpt API key bypasses absolutely everything atmo, making it your own chatgpt version running on your own system and storing the query data on your own computer - the data doesn't get to leave your PC.
The most important thing: We already have several open source smaller model LLMs which are being trained right now: Open assistant & Pygmalion.
StabilityAi is planning to release one that they're training too.
These will end up as personal assistants for everyone because any device can be connected to them and they will obliterate all competition because they're open source, can run on personal computers and won't sell your data to giant corps.
I'm already using them to aid my job (writing) even though they're weaker than chatgpt at the moment.
My wife is using an API, uncensored version of chatgpt as a personal assistant right now to help her write new python software.
H4X00R- t1_j7k7ybv wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Just a question... do u have 0.5 KB/s
MightyDickTwist t1_j7k6di0 wrote
Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in Who do you think will have a better/more popular AI search assistant, Google or Microsoft? by HumanSeeing
I’m not… sure this can be applied to LLM. I can see it for Stable Diffusion, but the amount of people that read smut isn’t all that significant.
Baturinsky t1_j7k3v0n wrote
JackFisherBooks t1_j7k3q9y wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
I think ChatGPT has definitely raised the profile of this sub. And as more and more AI products become available, there will be greater interest in the potential/dangers. I won't be too surprised if this sub has around 400k by the end of the year.
maskedpaki t1_j7k2jug wrote
Reply to comment by Oscarcharliezulu in 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
by next tuesday since growth is exponential
GayHitIer t1_j7k2hu0 wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
And it's going faster and faster.
Just hope this sub doesn't turn into futurology.
Let's remember what this sub originated from.
TacomaKMart t1_j7k1gl9 wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in You.com released v2 of YouChat, adding multimedia content to their chat-based search by quanik_314
I've been using it for the last month, especially on those days that ChatGPT is down.
Apparently it's based on GPT3 rather than ChatGPT's 3.5, but it's still very usable. It isn't quite as good as ChatGPT at refining an idea through back-and-forth chat but I like it more than the Openai Playground.
Added bonus - very few restrictions, and it's pretty hard to get it to moralize at you.
quantummufasa t1_j7k0vdt wrote
Reply to comment by yeaman1111 in John Carmack’s ‘Different Path’ to Artificial General Intelligence by lolo168
The idea that its totally feasible for one guy to reach AGI and it could be the legend John Carmack gets me so pumped
Oscarcharliezulu t1_j7jzsvu wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Next stop 500k !
Melodic_Manager_9555 t1_j7jygnm wrote
Reply to comment by PrivateLudo in Who do you think will have a better/more popular AI search assistant, Google or Microsoft? by HumanSeeing
what's the problem with making the switch, with parental controls? If parents do not follow or turn on this nsfw filter themselves, then this will be their problem.
Yelov t1_j7jy5ex wrote
Reply to comment by HumanSeeing in Who do you think will have a better/more popular AI search assistant, Google or Microsoft? by HumanSeeing
The vast majority of people use Google. If Microsoft and Google release their AI models into their search engines at a similar time, people won't really feel the need to switch from Google to Bing, even if it's better. At least the majority of people wouldn't care that much. It's not like your average person is following this closely. Likewise people who use Bing probably won't switch to Google.
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_j7jy3lr wrote
Reply to Who do you think will have a better/more popular AI search assistant, Google or Microsoft? by HumanSeeing
It's going to be expensive. I grabbed a huge envelope. Even assuming one cent per request, Google would have to pay tens of millions per hour at least. How will they earn it back? I think they won't for several years. Unless they keep the service minimal and do something clever. My friend Fred says that Facebook will surprise us with something in a few months. And they might even offer images alongside the text albeit not high resolution.
cloudrunner69 t1_j7khy5g wrote
Reply to comment by Evil_Patriarch in 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Don't worry too much about it, Reddit will be gone in a few years anyway once everyone gets their sexy personal AI assistant.