Recent comments in /f/singularity
Slow-Schedule-7725 t1_j8begv5 wrote
r/brandnewsentence whAT
Superschlenz t1_j8bd2cy wrote
Just saw it: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lIf27sHt2QA
chrisc82 t1_j8bcue2 wrote
Yes, I was just talking to my friend about ChatGPT and what improvements the future may hold when that commercial came on. I was pretty surprised and used it as a segue to discuss the implications of recursively self-improving AI. Fuckin' wild.
Sashinii t1_j8b6cq0 wrote
Nope. I don't follow sports so I didn't even know the Super Bowl was today until just recently.
So I just watched what is a Squarespace advertisement: it mostly involves an actor saying "web sites" a lot, which I think is supposed to be funny, and that's about it.
Nmanga90 t1_j8ar7ic wrote
Reply to comment by Art10001 in Recursive self-improvement (intelligence explosion) cannot be far away by Kaarssteun
Not right now it won’t. We already know of ways to improve AI, but we don’t have data to allow an AI to improve itself. The only way for that would be generative design, which is by nature very wasteful and slow. Once it gets to a certain point yes, but as of right now we are far (relatively) from that
randomthrowaway-917 t1_j8aodv2 wrote
Reply to comment by Tiamatium in The naivety of arguments on both sides of the AGI debate is quite frustrating to look at by Particular_Number_68
i try
Art10001 t1_j8al0vd wrote
Reply to comment by Nmanga90 in Recursive self-improvement (intelligence explosion) cannot be far away by Kaarssteun
The intelligence explosion will happen faster if we let the AI improve itself.
DukkyDrake t1_j8ag2f9 wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in Recursive self-improvement (intelligence explosion) cannot be far away by Kaarssteun
If the entire loop isn't fully automated, the parts that still depends on humans will bottle neck each recursive cycle. That means progress will be accelerated over pure human r&d, but no runaway acceleration.
Villad_rock t1_j89ynbr wrote
Reply to The naivety of arguments on both sides of the AGI debate is quite frustrating to look at by Particular_Number_68
Did you copy the text from all the other ones who posted the exactly same thing?
Unfrozen__Caveman t1_j89xqag wrote
Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in Are you prepping just in case? by AvgAIbot
The entire concept of a post scarcity society is flawed though. We see artificial scarcity all over the place today. Look at diamonds for a simple example. When something is plentiful and valuable humans almost always step in and throttle its availability.
Insulin is insanely cheap to make but drug companies stepped in and now it costs people hundreds of dollars.
You could have an AGI that creates whatever you want out of nothing but if the distribution of resources is handled by humans greed will always corrupt the process and average people will get exploited. It's been that way since the dawn of civilization.
If we're truly going to have a utopia (which I don't believe we will) human beings would need to be removed from decision-making roles. And even if that were to happen, who's to say that an AGI would even care about us? They might just look at us how we look at our single-cell organism ancestors.
RemindMeBot t1_j89sjtr wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
I will be messaging you in 20 years on 2043-02-12 18:50:31 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)
| ^(Info) | ^(Custom) | ^(Your Reminders) | ^(Feedback) |
|---|
ihateshadylandlords t1_j89shbm wrote
Reply to comment by kaiww77 in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
!RemindMe 20 years
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_j89s90r wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
You can't prepare for the singularity. If you believe in a collapse, you can prepare for this. I personally don't. Even if it was certain, I can't be bothered. You can save, invest, and be frugal, but if UBI arrives, it would have been for nothing. My friend Fred says that the singularity is like nuclear fusion, always decades away. I don't really know. An infinite rate increase seems physically impossible because of physical constraints.
LowSalad t1_j89otl8 wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
i can relate,
AvgAIbot t1_j89nzcn wrote
Reply to comment by cocopuffs239 in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
That, but also they just don’t want to hear it. They’re not tech enthusiasts at all. Some of them it also causes a type of existential anxiety so they don’t like thinking about it.
cocopuffs239 OP t1_j89lsk1 wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
Do you think it's like that because they don't have a full grasp on what it means?
AvgAIbot t1_j89jzzo wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
My loved ones aren’t really interested in AI, so they kinda just brush off the idea
SgathTriallair t1_j89b4yl wrote
Reply to comment by expelten in Are you prepping just in case? by AvgAIbot
We had a sarin gas attack in Tokyo. These are things that already exist.
If AI gives everyone access to a bio lab then you will have access to a cure producing one as well.
DukkyDrake t1_j897fzr wrote
Reply to The naivety of arguments on both sides of the AGI debate is quite frustrating to look at by Particular_Number_68
>it is surely a huge step towards the path to AGI
No such thing is assured, unless maybe if you're referring to a compositional AGI system. Everything stands on its own merits. Don't discount the possibility that you're subject to the same bias blind spots as those you accuse.
HeinrichTheWolf_17 t1_j8970vf wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
Honestly, I wouldn’t go out of your way, and I don’t wanna sound selfish when I say that, I say this because humans have naturally been resistant to change down through history, and yet the reactionary sentiments always go away with a little time. You’re better off just looking after yourself and those close to you in life until things take off.
If you see an opportunity with friends maybe bring it up, but ultimately it doesn’t matter if people approve of the progress, because progress happens whether humanity likes it or not.
Just remember that reactionary sentiments always lose, you can’t stop progress and change.
cocopuffs239 OP t1_j891q8h wrote
Reply to comment by ElvinRath in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
So what your saying is that we really don't know if the singularity will happen. Thus we should refrain from communicating this to other people (longer term stuff)?
I think I've been so excited for this for years that if it does happen I want everyone I know to be 'prepared' (as prepared as one could be). I'm a firm believer that ignorance is bliss but I'd rather know and be in chaos over it.
Kule7 t1_j891l4a wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
To me, it is clear AI will advance rapidly, but exactly how rapidly and with what particular impacts on society, I have little clue. How do you prepare for that?
TheSecretAgenda t1_j88xo0d wrote
Reply to Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
Just whisper "The singularity is near" in their ear and run away.
kaiww77 t1_j88wntw wrote
Reply to comment by ElvinRath in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
Reversing aging will be here within 20 years mate
SlowCrates t1_j8bfv7y wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Show us ChatGPT's response