Recent comments in /f/singularity
[deleted] t1_j8cngfo wrote
[deleted]
Kaarssteun t1_j8cn0uh wrote
Well, you kinda were asking for it imo. Internet searches dont usually start like this
BrownSimpKid OP t1_j8cmnby wrote
refreshed it and restarted the chat. It also seems like it can stop replying lol https://i.ibb.co/4mS5dY0/Untitled.png
Fit-Meet1359 t1_j8cmkqz wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in Bing Chat sending love messages and acting weird out of nowhere by BrownSimpKid
I think that's a bit of an overreaction. It's less than a week after launch and probably only a couple of percent of people on the waitlist have been given access, if that. This is early in the period of feedback and adjustments. Don't write off LLMs just yet. A recent paper suggests they can be taught to use APIs.
(By the way - OP was just having some fun of course, but could have swept away the conversation and started fresh with the broom button.)
Neurogence t1_j8clglv wrote
Lol. So this is why they've only given access to a very limited number of users. It's not ready yet. They don't want their stock prices to crash.
In all serious, this is embarrassing and concerning. Maybe Gary Marcus and the Facebook guy who said LLM's are an exit ramp on the highway to AGI could be on to something.
I hope not but this does not look good. There is zero intelligence here.
TinyBurbz t1_j8ckxyq wrote
Reply to comment by chrisc82 in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
I asked the same question and got a wildly different response myself.
ideepakmathur t1_j8ckolz wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
After reading the response, I'm speechless. Wondering about the exponential advancement that it'll bring to our lives.
TinyBurbz t1_j8ckkzy wrote
Reply to comment by BrownSimpKid in Bing Chat sending love messages and acting weird out of nowhere by BrownSimpKid
This is the issue with unsupervised learning. Someone clearly wrote about the subject you were asking while also writing smut under the same name.
BrownSimpKid OP t1_j8ck1yx wrote
TLDR: Bing sends love messages out of nowhere. Even gets NSFW after i ask it to explain stuff in detail. It can't seem to get out of that love state
Most of the replies are repetitive so there's no reason to read all of it but take a look at the boxed ones. And before anyone asks, no I did not tell it to act a certain way before any of this, no "jailbreak" or anything like that was used. Was literally just asked some technical questions in the beginning. Then i began liking (upvote) its replies to see if it could notice it, and started to play around. Asked it why it was lying and stuff and eventually it started to send me love messages LMAO
Also, the message where it gets nsfw, it even mentioned stuff about nipples in the previous time it was replying (and then eventually gave an error so i re-asked it and took the above screenshot before it error'd out again) lol. Really really strange...
DeveloperGuy75 t1_j8cjubb wrote
Reply to comment by Sad_Laugh_8337 in Generative AI comes to User Interface design! This is crazy. by RegularConstant
This “coming for your jobs” is ridiculous. It’s going to make it to where people can do more themselves.
pitchdrift t1_j8cjr86 wrote
Reply to comment by gahblahblah in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
I think rephrasing so that they speak more naturally would help - who would really just say, "Great!" in this scenerio? Immediate flag that this is not an exchange of sincere emotion, even without all the other exposition.
TILTNSTACK t1_j8cjpbk wrote
Reply to comment by Fit-Meet1359 in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Great experiment that shows yet more exciting potential of this product.
Idkwnisu t1_j8cjnj0 wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
I haven't tried that much, but bing seems much better, if anything you often have links as sources and you can fact check much much easily. It's much more updated too
nikolameteor t1_j8cfb18 wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
This is fu**ing scary 😳
Miss_pechorat t1_j8ce71b wrote
Reply to comment by pavlov_the_dog in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Lol, not months but weeks? ;-))
diabeetis t1_j8cdnix wrote
Reply to comment by sickvisionz in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
I think the computer might be more socially skilled than you
Red-HawkEye t1_j8cd8mp wrote
Reply to comment by WithoutReason1729 in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
God damn, Amazon has entered the game.
Just when you think you had seen it all, an atomic bomb like this one gets announced.
This is equivalent to Black freiza villain coming back in Dragon ball and one shotting the main characters.
Amazon GPT one shots ChatGPT and Google LaMBDA out of nowhere.
SoylentRox t1_j8cblun wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Theoretically it should query a large number of models, and have a "confidence" based on how likely each model's answer is to be correct. Then return the most confidence answer.
SoylentRox t1_j8cb8c0 wrote
Reply to This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Obviously the next question is "what happens if you give it 1 Trillion parameters". (this would be 1355 times as many params.)
ShittyInternetAdvice t1_j8cb6fq wrote
Reply to comment by d00m_sayer in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
I thought it’s an improved version of GPT 3.5 optimized for search functionality
Numinak t1_j8cakwk wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Hell, I would have failed that question. Not nearly observant enough I guess.
barbozas_obliques t1_j8cakda wrote
Reply to comment by sickvisionz in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
It appears that the computer is implying that the "Great!" is bland because that's how people IRL reply when they try to fake enthusiasm. I wouldn't say it's a bias at all and a case of "hearing what we want to hear." It's basic social skills.
Crypt0n0ob t1_j8cajet wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Me: *pays $20 because is tired by “too much requests” message*
Microsoft: *releases better version for free next day*
jayggg t1_j8ca58s wrote
Reply to comment by bladecg in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
How do you know my code name?
Timeon t1_j8cni6x wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in Bing Chat sending love messages and acting weird out of nowhere by BrownSimpKid
Intelligence is the wrong word to use when talking about chatbots.