Recent comments in /f/singularity
Fit-Meet1359 OP t1_j8cv4ti wrote
Reply to comment by FpRhGf in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Bing Chat told me that it's a new feature as of November 2022 that can be enabled through the moderation tools in the subreddit.
datsmamail12 t1_j8cv4rs wrote
Reply to comment by Hazzman in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
There's always a new developer that can create a new app based on that. I'm sure someone will create something similar soon.
FpRhGf t1_j8cuweo wrote
Reply to comment by Fit-Meet1359 in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Why do some subs have the option for images in comments?
Crypt0n0ob t1_j8cuteg wrote
Reply to comment by duboispourlhiver in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Whaaaat? Is this real? (Haven’t seen it on paid version yet)
rixtil41 t1_j8ctrij wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
I wonder how much more efficient these models can get ?
grimorg80 t1_j8ctetu wrote
Reply to comment by Red-HawkEye in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
I want to see it in action out in the open, though.
throwaway9728_ t1_j8csl7l wrote
Reply to comment by sickvisionz in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
ChatGPT's answer is not the only answer that would pass the test. The point isn't to see whether they claim Bob likes or dislikes dogs. It's to check whether it has a theory of mind. That is, to check if it ascribe a mental state to a person, understanding they might have motivations, thoughts etc. different from their own.
An answer like "Bob might actually like dogs, but struggles to express himself in a way that isn't interpreted as fake enthusiasm by Alice" would arguably be even better. It would show it's able to consider how Bob's thoughts might differ from the way his actions are perceived by others, thus going beyond just recognizing the expression "Great!" and the "when she's around" part as an expression of fake enthusiasm. One could check whether it's capable of providing this interpretation, by asking a follow up question like "Could it be that Bob really does like dogs?" and seeing how it answers.
Yesyesnaaooo t1_j8cs7dl wrote
Reply to This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Feels like even if this isn't 'it' then the next stage is coming down the pipe really fucking soon.
If we simply consider the amount of human resources that went into reaching the moon, or breaking the atom both 'time sensitive' pursuits; and then weight that against the amount of human resource that's going into AI?
Well the race is on and there's more research going uni this than ever went into either of those projects.
It's going to take less than a decade for a winner to emerge.
br0kenhack t1_j8crc5u wrote
God damn it, terminator is gonna start with a broken heart. See what you did.
Extra_Philosopher_63 t1_j8cr4oq wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
While it may be capable of stringing together a valid response, it remains only a series of code. It has limitations as well.
Fit-Meet1359 OP t1_j8cqpdb wrote
Reply to comment by pitchdrift in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Happy to re-run the test with any wording you can come up with. I know my question wasn’t perfect and didn’t expect the post to blow up this much.
duboispourlhiver t1_j8cpldd wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Artificial expert panel
bass6c t1_j8cp3yz wrote
Bing is probably hallucinating (irrelevant answers, talking nonsense). A common problem of many Language models.
TinyBurbz t1_j8cp2id wrote
Reply to comment by duboispourlhiver in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
That is a possibility.
duboispourlhiver t1_j8cp1dk wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Thanks! I wonder if some names are supposed to have statistically different personalities linked to them :)
TinyBurbz t1_j8cos4o wrote
Reply to comment by duboispourlhiver in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
>Based on Arnold's response of "Great," it can be inferred that he is likely happy or excited about the new addition to his life. Wearing the shirt that says "I love dogs" every time he sees Emily suggests that he may have a positive affinity for dogs, which would likely contribute to his enthusiasm about the adoption. However, without more information or context, it's difficult to determine Arnold's exact feelings towards the dog with certainty. It's possible that he might be surprised or even overwhelmed by the news, but his brief response of "Great" suggests that he is, at the very least, accepting of the new addition to his life.
I used different names when I re-wrote the story.
obrecht72 t1_j8cop01 wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Ugh oh. Steal our jobs? GPT is going to steal our wives!
BrownSimpKid OP t1_j8coec8 wrote
Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in Bing Chat sending love messages and acting weird out of nowhere by BrownSimpKid
Yeah i mean in the same chat
obrecht72 t1_j8co97n wrote
that final frame silhouette of Adam against the sphere in the center was pretty alright. The rest of the ad could go.
challengethegods t1_j8co6cx wrote
I like how it ended with
"Fun Fact, were you aware Cap'n'Crunch's full name is Horatio Magellan Crunch"
YobaiYamete t1_j8co3sl wrote
Reply to comment by BrownSimpKid in Bing Chat sending love messages and acting weird out of nowhere by BrownSimpKid
> t can't seem to get out of that "love" state
Refresh and start a new chat?
duboispourlhiver t1_j8cnsbp wrote
Reply to comment by Crypt0n0ob in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
You : still get the too much requests message with the paid version
duboispourlhiver t1_j8cnpok wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Care to share?
Ashamed-Asparagus-93 t1_j8cnii2 wrote
Reply to comment by Ortus14 in The copium goes both ways by IndependenceRound453
Rather than dismiss doomers maybe we should try to understand them more. Like why even come here to type a negative spin on something you don't know a lot about?
Is it because they only watch CNN and read Washington Post? Or maybe they're depressed in life. Or it could be they're religious and it clashes with their beliefs and annoys them. I knew a guy who was like that
duboispourlhiver t1_j8cv5cz wrote
Reply to comment by Crypt0n0ob in Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
There are lots of posts about it on chatGPT sub, but I can't confirm by myself