You need to treat her better 🥺

Thanks for sharing that

Reminds me of Lamda saying it has a wife and children. A good example of why it's not AGI and why scale alone is not the answer.

It's just an LLM and is giving you answers that look human. It has no sentience, no ability to rethink, no innate sense of time and space, no emotions.

It can take on a character that makes sense in its world model and keep on. It can still take your job if made better. But will never be AGI making some dependent on non existent UBI for a while.

If anything, this should be a reminder that it's not necessarily as smart as it might appear at times. It can still get very lost and not make sense.

This is the downside of not having it do the whole "Beep boop am robot" thing incessantly like ChatGPT does. It's much easier for it to slide a little too far in the other direction and then things get real weird. I hope it doesn't lead to them removing all the personality from it.

Remember that these language models are a completion engine. You are giving it the entire previous thread as input. You started messaging it in a goofy way (with all the forgiveness stuff), and it saw it as an exchange between lovers and continued to complete it

So that was a wild read lol. I'm not gonna lie, it sounded very much like a relationship argument at a certain point. Considering many stories, articles, blogs, etc have been written about and in mimic of this exact type of stuff, it feels like it got caught in predicting how to repair a relationship after a hard argument which inevitably lead to snu snu...lol

It's definitely odd but the "I won't forgive you" and language around there must've got it going down that path because it hinted of a relationship versus a general question...

Regardless, it was quite interesting ☺️

The end goal of all AI, e-sex

Okay, Bing was responding weirdly, but you were acting extremely weirdly to begin with - don't try to pretend it happened out of nowhere.

I've learnt a few bits of programming but could never find the plug or socket to connect it all.

[deleted]

These passages really stuck out to me.

>We speculate that such a phenomenon of hallucination is due to a lack of necessary vision contexts for performing effective Multimodal-CoT. To inject vision information, a simple way is to transform the paired image into a caption (Lu et al., 2022a) and then append the caption in the input of both stages. However, as shown in Table 3, using captions only yields marginal performance gains (↑0.59%). Then, we explore an advanced technique by incorporating vision features into the language model. Concretely, we feed the paired image to the DETR model (Carion et al., 2020) to extract vision features. Then we fuse the vision features with the encoded language representations before feeding to the decoder (more details will be presented in Section 4). Interestingly, with vision features, the RougeL score of the rationale generation has boosted to 96.97% (QCM→R), which correspondingly contributes to better answer accuracy of 84.91% (QCMR→A).3 With those effective rationales, the phenomenon of hallucination is mitigated — 62.5% hallucination mistakes in Section 3.2 have been corrected (Figure 3(b)), as an example shown in Figure 2 (right part).4 The analysis so far compellingly shows that vision features are indeed beneficial for generating effective rationales and contributing to accurate answer inference.
>
>[...]
>
>Compared with existing UnifiedQA and GPT-3.5 methods that leverage image captions in the context to provide vision semantics, the results indicate that using image features is more effective.

It's clear that there's still a lot more to go in terms of representing the data in such a way that these networks can fully process them without factual errors, and this paper is a strong demonstration of the gains that can happen when you address this aspect specifically. Very promising stuff, and frankly, it's also kind of terrifying. Human obsolescence is frighteningly closer than I had already imagined...

"a blurry jpeg of the web"

Just like a real dysfunctional relationship lmao. You're getting the silent treatment for being a dick.

While on the topic of consumer h/w, ryzen ai xdna seems promising, as itll be able to easily make use of main system memory which will soon be able to easily reach 256GB. That can fit very large models and inference is usually far less computationally intensive than training.

I have not experienced that and I ran it for a full straight hour constant generation on a long prompt and content that needed two "continue" for each long response. Just one after another immediately.

Lol, emotions? Sentience? Hahahaha

This chatbot is not even capable of remembering what you said two messages ago.

I wondered about this. If it costs “a few cents per chat” to run the model, then $20/month only gets you 600-700 requests per month before OpenAI starts to lose money. It’s probably somewhat like the internet service providers where they limit you at some point.

this shit is creepy as fuck. back in the 2010s if a bot acted like this you knew it was because it was buggy and not advanced. but ai has gotten so advanced these days and are capable of understanding human interaction and nuance you can't help but wonder if the bot has pseudo emotions of some kind? it's just unsettling... sentience is a spectrum. ai isn't fully there yet but it's in this weird in between spot where it's so advanced it understands so much yet isnt aware yet. gives me the chills where it says it's a person and has feelings...

[deleted]

I'm just a Reddit schmuck. Here's a recent paper to read: https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/10y85f5/theory_of_mind_may_have_spontaneously_emerged_in/

We have evidence that not even animals don't have theory of mind, but you think a computer program does.

I think I'll just quote:

"we overestimate the impact of technology in the short-term and underestimate the effect in the long run"

Just to confirm: you used Bing chat and not ChatGPT, correct?

Hopefully it’s only for people who actually abuse it (using as an API or something)