Maybe so. I've totally used the word "great" to describe something that I thought was the textbook definition of the word great.

This is the principle of separation of concerns at work. Many focused capsules working together are stronger than one huge LLM. And it is easier to fine tune and prune individual capsules than one giant black box. It makes sense at inference time too. Eventually you could have a minimal model running locally with the sole purpose of figuring out which web services to contact for a given request.

> Immediate flag that this is not an exchange of sincere emotion

Only if your AI is trained on a bunch of Romance Novels. The emotion behind 'Great!' depends on the tone. The word can express a range of emotions. Real people say 'Great' and mean it sincerely, sarcastically, or some other way.

You ask the bot to write a steamy erotic dialogue so it did.

Can it solve aging already…..?

No…..?

Ok then……

It's literally meeeee

Nothing as naive as thinking this is the first time this exact post has been made lol

But the bot shouldn’t respond that inappropriately..

The humans they tested on were random people on Mechanical Turk, so that data point is not very illuminating.

Skynet wants you now.

Enjoy getting recycled into paperclips.

Man provides chat bot with very weird prompts. Becomes mad when the chat bot responds in kind... More at 11

Keep in mind that the “human” line here is data they got from assigning the questions to randos on Mechanical Turk. It is not saying that their model is better than scientists. Still a really cool result, I just know how people here love to jump to insane conclusions.

Why wouldnt it have a way of filtering AI generated data

This is what search engines will look like now. We ask a question, get lost in a conversation and argument, and forget about what we wanted to know in the first place.

Honestly, connect it to Google Scholar or Pubmed, and it can write literature reviews. Not sure of it's still limited by the same 4000 token limit or not, as it seems to go through a lot of bing results... Maybe it summarizes those and sends them to chat, maybe it sends whole pages.

Benchmarks are really hard and expensive. And they are not fun or exciting for the people involved; the groups that make them really deserve more credit.

We think it is a "problem", but within themselves, they may think otherwise. 👿

Likely it has some of the same tech behind it like replika. Where others like it saying that so it assumes to say that

Good lord, this is incredible. This thing is going to be able to perform cognitive behavioral therapy very soon. Just merge GPT with those ai avatars and you got yourself a free therapist. Of course, at first, most people won’t feel comfortable venting to a machine, much less taking advice about how to live a better life. But eventually everyone is just gonna open up their little ai therapist whenever they need to cry about a breakup or need general life advice.

Apparently one of my professors well, her husband has a home grade computer system with 2 TB of RAM. I tried searching it up. It only seems like server type size but yeah

It's definitely not 4. It's just a 3.5 backend with modified fine tuning for being used in a search engine.

What's interesting is someone in your other thread got the same exact to the letter response from Chat GPT. This says 2 things: This is likely the same build as 3.5 on the backend... And there is a formula it's using to get the same exact response.

> The reason we won't have access to this is

I think it's more about people don't have a place to create a room dedicated to medical procedures?

Your dismissal of that argument is stupid and lazy. Intellectually dishonest, it ignores the fact that brains work in different ways and currently schooling is designed to focus on one aspect of learning: regurgitation.

​

You are a child and should keep your opinions closer to the chest until you get some experience under your belt.

>I hope it doesn't lead to them removing all the personality from it.

Narrator: It did.