I think you would be surprised how bad that would turn out. Imagine if someone talked to you the way that GPT writes its responses. It looks okay in written form, but it is not at all how people talk. It would be serious uncanny valley.

I expect this by the end of the year at the latest. Was just reading about a Whisper implementation that works in real time with no delay (it can do 1hr of audio in 10 seconds), could be really useful for something like this.

Yeah, that's what my last paragraph says this.

>However, they announced customized chatGPT for other companies. So romantic chatGPT may be coming, unless they want to limit them too, which is a relevant possibility.

Nobody's saying LLMs won't be used for romance, the question was why it's not being used for romance nowadays. The explanation is simple: the inventors of that LLM (Bard, chatGPT) are working for major corporations (Google, Microsoft) and those major corporations are heavily constrained by the investors regarding the age rating of their services.

The closest chance for a romantic LLM is probably a third-party company using chatGPT or Bard, probably. But that's assuming that corporations allow third-parties to have 18+ content. If not, then let's pray open source alternatives to chatGPT come very soon, as they should.

Edit: "then it won't happen" I literally said I believe it'll happen in the last paragraph.

It shouldn't matter though, should it? I'm amazed how a lot of people anthropomorphize this chatbot and care about its 'feelings' instead of caring what vulnerabilities it has and how it can break.

Everyone laughed when that Google engineer thought the bot was sentient and all I see is people doing the exact same thing.

Yes, but your point was that because Google is not gonna do it then it won't happen. And my point is that tech finds a way. Someone will definitely do it, no doubt about it.

Lol. I was using it for half an hour, testing information about my country and then asking for a summary of articles. I don't even remember the number of lies, fabricated links and false summaries that it gave me. A real disaster.

I think he's suggesting using different completely separate models that target different "topics" or queries within the same application instead of having a general agent. It would do better at the specific jobs and to you still look like a self-contained tool instead of 100 applications/webapps

I'm suspicious to say because I think AI models are already slightly conscious or alive even before the advent of transformers lol

>People don't assuming they're talking to AI, they always assume they're talking to a human.

Well, that's not the Turing test then.

Microsoft has their own text to speech(Wall-E) which is significantly better than even elevenai models, so they would probably use that. But they probably are already testing out as many possibilites as they can dream up internally

Is there any chance of producing rogue AI?

Oh trust me, it's happening. It's just not done yet.

We're talking about Google being the owner of that porn site. We can indeed say there's no PornHub owned by Google.

Sure, but you can't say that because YouTube doesn't allow porn, then porn videos don't exist.

Yeah, but I think OP was talking about AI in general. Not just LLMs.

The only downside to Bing Chat to ChatGPT is that you can only have 1 chat at a time and that It doesn't really want to roleplay. Otherwise of course bing is way better. But both are absolutely incredible. We are litteraly transferring in a new era rn, we are basically already in it, and its so painful to see so many older people not even knowing it.

The idea that death is a blessing because it gives life meaning seems like Stockholm Syndrome to me.

the thing is by making it imitate our communication methods, we are intrinsically trying to do both.

Think of the intelligence of your average user, half of them are dumber than that.

We’re not designing ourselves a new friend, we are designing a tool.

Not yet, no, I've been very focused on producing. I'm considering documenting my progress on YouTube

are you documenting your work anywhere? i'd be very interested in seeing it. thanks.

well bias is human thing because of our inability to know people beyond labels, besides our small tribes. the generalizations that we make are trained into AIs now, but the nature of training and how it reacts to bias will have to change for the better.
as for all-knowing, imagine interfacing with a single entity that knows every other person to some degree, has all human knowledge, and can renew you car registration with an ask. it may turn out to be the ultimate fair judge and arbiter of human affairs with the goal of minimizing suffering and maximizing happiness.

i understand what you're saying provided they aren't sentient, but if they are thought to be sentient, the problems with that can't be ignored. regardless, i don't think we should normalize being abusive towards an intelligence simply because it isn't technically sentient. that will likely lead to the same treatment of an intelligence/agi that is considered sentient, because there will probably be very little distinction between the two at first, leading people to abuse it the same as a "dumb" ai.

> I’m not saying it’s right […]

Of course it’s right. It’s equally right that we don’t design hammers with nervous systems and a mouth that says “Ow, ow, ow” while you hit things with it.