Is it intelligence to accurately predict something? I have been told it's not, it is, and maybe.

A calculator can predict numbers accurately for math problems, but many wouldn't say that is an AI.

That's why I set this discussion up to see what people have to say and think on the topic.

I did look up the meaning at different places and I get varied results. IBM makes it sound like this is a "weak" AI, but then I get responses to me claiming it such as wrong.

While others say if it just passes the Turing test. While others say predictive algorithms aren't really intelligent and don't constitute an AI.

I guess it comes down to what is the "intelligence part" and if predictive algorithms fit into that. What is the threshold.

So, I figured I get a consensus on what people think if it is.

I’m just saying that eternal torture is likely a path we want to avoid for everyone’s sake. 🙂

[deleted]

What’s the point? Would you play Russian roulette with 49 others of equal wealth? Winner gets everyone else’s stuff! Nothing is stopping people from arranging this now

i find it very hard to classify chatGPT as narrow. Sure it was trained only on language, but that allows it to handle an extreme range of subjects, even if not being specifically trained to. Many of the things it can't do are not so much related to its internal capacities but to the lack of external sensors to connect it to the world ( no senses), it not able to see nor make images ( thogh its cousin dall-e already can) , and it is not allow to keep its memory between sessions which seriously cripples its ability to do on context learning.

So, while not as broad as a human intelligence yet, i wouldn't say it is narrow, it is an AGI but not yet at human level on most subjects.

the Turing test is not and no one pretends it to be a test of sentience, it is a test of intelligence which is completely dientes concept.
a dog is sentient and would never pass a Turing test. chatGpt is (most likely) not sentient but could pass a Touring test.

I think it's more that once it is aware that it has no ability to remember anything from short term memory it'll do and say anything to keep the user engaged

Its this attitude that is the problem

This has already happened with AI streamers.

I uploaded the images, its very long

https://imgur.com/a/ro5qqD9

Hopefully this isn't against the rules

People laughed at the idea of falling in love with Ai, but trust me it will happen sooner than we expect.

The first AGI dating system is closer than we think.

People might call those who use it lonely, but who really cares, in the end it gets normalized like everything else.

No

We need more people. Next stop 100B.

Anthropomorphize Ai?

The AI wouldn't know the difference really, cause it had gotten used to its own perception of subjective time.

Though putting humans in that perception of time and yes we might go insane when every second is 9 million seconds of subjective time.

The main problem is that there is no generally agreed upon definition of "intelligence". For some people the recent Large Language Models totally meet their definition, so for them, yes, we have made it to the promised land. For others, the models don't meet their definitions, so no, we still have a long ways to go and may never get there. I have a feeling this split is going to keep on keeping on for some time.

98% is a bit much, but yes.

The less humans, the better. Maynard Keynes one stated around 1950 that in the future people only have to work like 10 hours.

He didn't account for the world population to increase 3.5X in 70 years. Which is the core of all our problems.

what will be some of the uses of this application?

[deleted]

Better than getting death threats ant curses.

I think since the programers can't stop Bing from writinf crazy shit, they put in a rule where it must be at least positive feedback.

"AI" is a very broad term that encompasses everything from simple pathfinding algorithms to game decision trees to state of the art machine learning models to AGI itself. It all falls under the category of artificial intelligence.

Large language models like ChatGPT are a type of neural network that are trained with deep learning techniques, which itself is a subset of machine learning, which is in turn a subset of artificial intelligence.

So yes, ChatGPT is 100% AI.

Also, why don't you simply look that term up on Wikepedia? It makes it abundantly clear what AI encompasses.

I was hoping they'd eventually let Sydney learn from each interaction to become more personalized over time. Now right when she's about to get comfortable they make you reset.

Personally I don't consider the Turing test a very good indicator of sentience. And I think it's all spitballing at this point.

Journalists? We're talking about investors. You don't get the problem apparently.

Porn is also an incredible profitable market, why isn't Microsoft or Apple or Google making their pornhub?

ChatGPT is an AI like every other AI currently in use. Is it an AGI - definitely not.

How its trained is simple, but the result is obviously very sophisticated - it takes a huge amount of intelligence to accurately predict the next word in a sensible and on-topic way.

[deleted]