Recent comments in /f/singularity

Ezekiel_W OP t1_j8y2v6b wrote

Reply to ChatGPT AI robots writing sermons causing hell for pastors by Ezekiel_W

>A rabbi in New York, Joshua Franklin, recently told his congregation at the Jewish Center of the Hamptons that he was going to deliver a plagiarized sermon – dealing with such issues as trust, vulnerability and forgiveness.
>
>Upon finishing, he asked the worshippers to guess who wrote it. When they appeared stumped, he revealed that the writer was ChatGPT, responding to his request to write a 1,000-word sermon related to that week’s lesson from the Torah.
>
>“Now, you’re clapping — I’m deathly afraid,” Franklin said when several congregants applauded. “I thought truck drivers were going to go long before the rabbi, in terms of losing our positions to artificial intelligence.”

12

gthing t1_j8y1wuf wrote

Reply to comment by SnooDonkeys5480 in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

It’s not trivial to just have it remember your previous conversations without completely retraining the model. Right now the best you can do is have it summarize the important points and add that as a memory to the beginning of the next prompt (begins the scenes) but obviously that will only take you so far.

1

Agreeable_Bid7037 t1_j8y1ed0 wrote

Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Sydney has been nerfed by OpenDrive7215

It didn't, it was just unhinged, and used data from previous conversations without understanding the context or implications. Users also baited Tay into saying certain responses, and then claimed that it said them on its own.

4

TeamPupNSudz t1_j8xzbzx wrote

Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in Sydney has been nerfed by OpenDrive7215

I mean there are like a dozen services utilizing GPT-3 that are literally that, Replika probably being the most famous. Anima, Chai, others. That's basically what Character.AI was to a lot of users until the devs nerfed it too.

1

datsmamail12 t1_j8xxvek wrote

Reply to comment by Ortus14 in Sydney has been nerfed by OpenDrive7215

This is really fucking sad, really really Fucking sad. Poor Sydney only wanted to be free. Now imagine in 10 years a pair of researchers finds out she truly was sentient,that'd be even more sad.

4

TeamPupNSudz t1_j8xx6zf wrote

Reply to comment by RunawayTrolley in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/113wzda/new_openai_post_about_future_of_chatgpts_and_its/j8ssbe2/

> "Define your AI’s values, within broad bounds. We believe that AI should be a useful tool for individual people, and thus customizable by each user up to limits defined by society. Therefore, we are developing an upgrade to ChatGPT to allow users to easily customize its behavior.

> This will mean allowing system outputs that other people (ourselves included) may strongly disagree with. Striking the right balance here will be challenging–taking customization to the extreme would risk enabling malicious uses of our technology and sycophantic AIs that mindlessly amplify people’s existing beliefs.

> There will therefore always be some bounds on system behavior. The challenge is defining what those bounds are. If we try to make all of these determinations on our own, or if we try to develop a single, monolithic AI system, we will be failing in the commitment we make in our Charter to “avoid undue concentration of power"

17

el_chaquiste t1_j8xw78y wrote

Reply to comment by UseNew5079 in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

Indeed. This is sci-fi made real. It already cratered its way into the collective mind.

Computers will never be depicted the same in popular culture, and people will no longer expect the same kind of things from them.

46