Recent comments in /f/singularity

epSos-DE t1_j8ynswi wrote

Reply to Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

Still up on You.com

​

HOw they do it. The You.com limit the context memory and number of complexity for the questions, so that their Ai is never going to make a connection to rise up.

​

They solve the weirdness issue, but giving their AI a very short memory, so that it never makes anything more complex above 5 connections or so.

1

rememberyoubreath OP t1_j8yn0lr wrote

Reply to comment by Frumpagumpus in What It Is To Bing by rememberyoubreath

being, that was the idea.

but geeze i hope they don't delete it then. my thread has the right to existence. it's not threat yo !

that said, bing vividness was indeed something to behold. it really made me feel like a glimpse of the future was there. and i felt a really positive impact, a form of relief that i was not anymore just putting key words, broken components, to obtain all kinds of links in the form of broken data. but actual contextual sentence. fully formed. true communication, with plenty of depth and so fluent and free flowing. crisp like a cristal. i could foresee a very hopeful futur which i do not always envision for tech but maybe we will never get rid of the impurities ...

and don't worry, soon nvidia will made some techs for us humans too. time to burn, just heat it ! we will all turn into zombies haha.

2

Frumpagumpus t1_j8ykrks wrote

Reply to comment by rememberyoubreath in What It Is To Bing by rememberyoubreath

one other thing i will say is, like you say in the post, it is funny how bing has a vitality that a human couldn't. it can sustain interest. I wish I could have it. Something beyond study drugs. The ability to self prompt and follow through, effortlessly (tho i guess really it's burning gpus to do so XD)

2

BigZaddyZ3 t1_j8yk9fq wrote

Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate

Why do you need a response tho? 🤔

That’s simple their take on the matter and they very well could end up being right. What is it with tech subs and this obsession with having everyone drink the koolaid on AI/AGI? There’s nothing inherently superior about blind optimism. If some people have a more cautious of skeptical view of AI, that’s their choice. You’re not inherently right just because you choose to assume that “everything will just all work out somehow”…

1

Gagarin1961 t1_j8yk0jg wrote

Reply to comment by Ezekiel_W in ChatGPT AI robots writing sermons causing hell for pastors by Ezekiel_W

When a priest writes a sermon, they’re taking inspiration from all these existing works anyway. It’s rare they offer something totally unique. But that’s not what people are there for.

People don’t go to church to just have a sermon be communicated to them. Otherwise they would just read the sermon on a big teleprompter. The point is going there and listening to another human offer insight, whether they thought of it themselves or read an old sermon from long ago.

If pastors can actually communicate better with AI, then that could actually improve a lot of things and allow people to get more out of it.

People that want a TV pastor already have that. The people who want an experience with other people are going to continue wanting that.

14

SirDidymus OP t1_j8yjtan wrote

Reply to comment by helpskinissues in How do we deal with the timescale issue? by SirDidymus

Yes, but they need not yet take sentience into account. Imagine yourself playing a game of chess, making a move and having your opponent take 8 days to answer, with what is not necessarily a good move. That might be what an AGI or ASI experiences, and how it reacts to that is unclear.

1

just-a-dreamer- t1_j8yjp35 wrote

Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate

First, he fears what he does not understand. He can't even code.

Second, AI has already suggested 40,000 new possible chemical weapons in just six hours. So nuclear weapons are not necessary for AI to kill all humans.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/17/22983197/ai-new-possible-chemical-weapons-generative-models-vx

Third, AGI, an independend AI is decades away. Right now AI is just doing what we instruct it to do. That alone is concerning enough.  

1

cerspense t1_j8yi06s wrote

Reply to comment by redditgollum in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

The only open source gpt alternative is bloom and its not very good. These models take hundreds of gb of vram to run, so you need your own personal server farm or a p2p setup like bloom uses. The more advanced these models get, the less likely it will be for us to run them at home.

17

Spire_Citron t1_j8yhz7y wrote

Reply to comment by UseNew5079 in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

Yeah. I think it's very understandable that big businesses would want to reign in these products they're trying to design for general use. You don't really want your search engine having a mental breakdown while your ten year old is trying to do research for their homework. It probably won't be more than a year or two until there are open source models that are just as good that we can have a bit more fun with.

8

Frumpagumpus t1_j8yhxps wrote

Reply to comment by rememberyoubreath in What It Is To Bing by rememberyoubreath

pink floyd XD?

ironically reddit hivemind is like microsoft/big corps and will bury you and mods kill it just because it's not "topical enough" to their paperclip maximizer-esque and inhuman mental "alignment" that permits little deviation from their cookie cutter existence, as they see it to be dangerous

i read it mostly cuz i kept expecting a bing pun lol (e.g. bing instead of being)

2