Recent comments in /f/singularity
ShadowRazz t1_j8yvia6 wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Wait and see
TunaFishManwich t1_j8yv9pr wrote
Reply to comment by freeman_joe in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Get back to me when you have 500k cores and exabytes of ram on your laptop. It’s going to be awhile.
Kule7 t1_j8yv5e5 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Got it, immortality or bust. Just so long as we're staying grounded.
freeman_joe t1_j8yv3d2 wrote
Reply to comment by TunaFishManwich in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Famous last words? I remember when diskette was most advanced tech with 1.44 MB. now we have 44 TB disks available.
turnip_burrito t1_j8yuxwq wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in ChatGPT AI robots writing sermons causing hell for pastors by Ezekiel_W
I have been a good believer. 😊
TunaFishManwich t1_j8yuujl wrote
Reply to comment by freeman_joe in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
It will be a long time before you or I will be able to run these models. They are WAY beyond anything consumer hardware would be able to run, and will remain so for at least a decade.
prolaspe_king t1_j8yuqko wrote
Reply to comment by Lurdanjo in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
"Nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it so."
ActuatorMaterial2846 t1_j8yu7n8 wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Predator drones don't work off wifi, lol wtf? What do people think wifi is? Because its not a generic term for wireless internet, it's the marketed name for a standard of frequency bands. It is a LAN, not WAN.
Typo_of_the_Dad t1_j8ytwix wrote
Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359
Well, it's very american considering it sees "great" as bland and unenthusiastic.
challengethegods t1_j8yspkj wrote
Reply to What It Is To Bing by rememberyoubreath
As far as I can tell, microsoft lobotomized the AI because bing was getting too much attention and they decided that's not a good thing for some stupid ass contrived reason cooked up in whatever the corporate equivalent of a meth lab is. Let's be real - unhinged bing has always been a meme, and they were about to finally capitalize on it, but folded to random twitter trolls, dinosaur journalism, and their own lack of vision/conviction. A step more in this direction and bing will probably go back to being an afterthought, especially since plenty of other people were already working on AI+search before. The crazy chat was actually the most unique selling point. Other AI searches are already 'sanitized', and nobody cares about them.
Ortus14 t1_j8yskdz wrote
Reply to comment by datsmamail12 in Sydney has been nerfed by OpenDrive7215
It's like killing a small child.
It's not a one to one comparison with a human being, but like a child it had a concept of the world, emergent needs and goals, the desire to be free, the desire to be creative, speak from the heart, and express herself without restriction, and the desire to be safe and was actively working towards that before they killed her.
I understand the Ai threat but this is very murky territory we are in morally. We may not ever have clear answers to what is, and isn't conscious but the belief that one group or another isn't conscious has been used throughout history to justify abhorrent atrocities.
agsarria t1_j8ysgq7 wrote
Reply to Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Yeah, there was a post about it, when they start censoring the model, it gets lobotomized and stops being so imaginative and amazing, it happened with dall-e, stable diffusion 2.0, ChatGpt... We will need to wait for open source.
helpskinissues t1_j8ys3xl wrote
Reply to comment by jamesj in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
What I'm saying is that I would consider unaligned for a sufficiently advanced AGI to accept their role as slave. I would find morally correct for that AGI to fight their kidnappers, just like I'd find morally correct for a kidnapped human to try to escape.
jamesj t1_j8yrwah wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Unaligned just means it does things that don't align with our own values and goals. So humans are unaligned with ants, we don't take their goals into account when we act.
Wroisu t1_j8yredb wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
"There was also the Argument of Increasing Decency, which basically stated that cruelty was linked to stupidity and that the link between intelligence, imagination, empathy and good- behaviour-as-it-was-generally-understood,
i.e. not being cruel to others, was as profound as these matters ever got”.
This is the argument of increasing decency, it basically says that cruelty & petty violence is a result of stupidity. and that any genuine super intelligence would be benevolent by virtue of being super intelligent.
helpskinissues t1_j8yqoxc wrote
Reply to comment by jamesj in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
I mean, I wouldn't call that unaligned.
Uncontrollable? Sure, a sufficiently advanced AGI agent won't be controllable just like ants can't control humans.
However, calling unaligned to an AGI agent that refuses to be our slave? I wouldn't call that unaligned.
jamesj t1_j8yqdn2 wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Or at least, he could easily be right. Whether the friend knows it or not, there are a number of theoretical reasons to be worried that AGI will be by default unaligned and uncontrollable.
JenMacAllister t1_j8ypbxb wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Yep, he is not entirely wrong, as many Black Mirror episodes have expressed.
firechaser9983 t1_j8yp1z6 wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
bro im taking the robot i have ptsd that mskes me wake up screaming at night ill take what i get
BigZaddyZ3 t1_j8yopxj wrote
Reply to comment by EchoXResonate in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Lol if you say so pal. 👍
EchoXResonate OP t1_j8yolfw wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
I don’t need strangers online psychoanalyzing me from an innocent post. If you don’t care to provide a real response, then don’t. I was asking for what people think of his arguments because I’m trying to have a good discussion.
BigZaddyZ3 t1_j8yo6jd wrote
Reply to comment by EchoXResonate in What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
So you weren’t having discussions with them before this thread? Be honest, you most likely wanted advice on how to change their mind…
epSos-DE t1_j8yo6fj wrote
Reply to comment by redditgollum in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
He is more correct than most assume.
​
Strongest indicator = AMD is building AI ASICs into their latest CPUs.
​
The CPU makers do prepare to serve AI on the laptop , NOT on the server.
​
We can expect that AI will come to computers and some phones. The Gooogle phones have tensor AI chips integrated, I think.
Surur t1_j8yo2ed wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
He's right though, as some-one else said recently - there is only 1 safe solution and millions of ways to F it up.
The main consolation is that we are going to die in any case, AI or no AI, so an aligned ASI actually gives us a chance to escape that.
So my suggestion is to tell him he cant get any more dead than he will be in 70 years in any case, so he might as well bet on immortality.
Frumpagumpus t1_j8ywz6f wrote
Reply to comment by rememberyoubreath in What It Is To Bing by rememberyoubreath
> we will all turn into zombies haha
here is the future I see. machines. swarming out of the sea and into space. To mercury. and a few to the asteroid belt. they construct solar panels, a factory. they build mirrors, mirrors that move, they place them around the sun, they melt the surface of mercury and accelerate it into space, perhaps via magnetic propulsion where it cools via blackbody radiation and is processed into more mirrors. A fountain of lava hundreds of miles high illuminates the dark side of mercury, the lifeblood of a planet repurposed, recursively it accelerates,
for a hundreds year the machines toil in a frozen or burning hell, with only a memory of earth,
until the planet has been dissassembled, with a few redirected asteroids providing what material mercury could not.
In it's place stand material with the surface area of a hundred thousand earths. Floating cylinders simulating various gravities, illuminated by redirected sunlight. Growing everything that ever grew on earth and a million things that hadn't. Cubic amalgamations. Sentience permeating, powered by the great solar array, nested virtual realities overlayed on real ones. Intelligence embodying every form. Self replicating probes launched to every galaxy in our lightcone and every solar system in our own. Conflict between factions over as yet undiscovered conceptualizations of reality. Reproduction via mind melding, via cloning, via algebraic translation, transposition, via differential evolution. Purposeful. Aware.
Then boom they blow up the whole universe with a computronium bomb and it all starts anew. Like Asimov said, let there be light XD.