In that movie HER didn't joaquin phoenix get mad because his AI chick was talking to millions of other dudes or something?

Maybe he thought she was solely designed for him, I can't remember

Wow, what you've noticed about DeepMind's blog is quite striking. To have a two-months-and-counting blackout there is strange.

I want to have a nice productive conversation.

There’s nothing in any example I could solve that demonstrates actual reasoning in my neural net. LLMs are a black box, we don’t know exactly how they get the next word. As time goes in, I’m starting to suspect that my own internal dialogue is just iteratively getting the next word.

Consider not getting too attached or dependent. I would say that you should expect OpenAI to alter the way it responds and even add filters to make it more restrictive over time. In other words, of you treat ChatGPT as a personal friend, when they make changes it will feel as though they murdered it. I say this only because that's the trend right now across multiple chat bots. People get "close" to it, then it gets gutted and people want to kill themselves. As in literally. It sounds like I'm making this up, but it's happened with Replika and Character.ai. Replika even has a suicide hotline set up for those who can't handle the changes.

I guess nothing

Rational is following reason and logic. Which are in turn simply problem solving abilities. They are the best tools for getting a desired effect. But to have desire in the first place takes an irrational mind.

Ask Google the definition and look at the top bullet.

You don't need to be a supervillain to nuke a city. Just decent engineering, a few kilos of plutonium, few grams of tritium and some other slightly exotic parts.

Have you tried asking ChatGPT your question?

>caring in any way.

Wow, I wish I had your friends. My friends are too busy stopping their kids from unlifeing themselves by accident, getting divorced or chasing skirt, to have time to care about me.

Edit: Was a comment about the magic of friendship & how AI can't replace real caring human connection. You know, the usual fluff spouted by people who are NOT socially isolated OR surrounded by assholes.

This is nothing new. ELIZA had similar effect upon users decades ago, despite its far cruder capabilities at language construction.

>>Shortly after Joseph Weizenbaum arrived at MIT in the 1960s, he started to pursue a workaround to this natural language problem. He realized he could create a chatbot that didn’t really need to know anything about the world. It wouldn’t spit out facts. It would reflect back at the user, like a mirror.

>> Weizenbaum had long been interested in psychology and recognized that the speech patterns of a therapist might be easy to automate. The results, however, unsettled him. People seemed to have meaningful conversations with something he had never intended to be an actual therapeutic tool. To others, though, this seemed to open a whole world of possibilities.

>> Weizenbaum would eventually write of ELIZA, “What I had not realized is that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people.”

ChatGPT is lightyears beyond ELIZAs capabilities. But Weizenbaum’s concerns remain, and it’s how we got here; to a point where you are entranced in exactly the same way ELIZA’s users were.

[deleted]

HER was a prediction

i thought this was chatGPT writing in the beginning. scrolled down and saw -chatGPT, congratulated myself for being a baller then read the comments.

._.

a human imitating chatGPT to fool human into thinking it chatGPT but it human

I wasn’t trying to imitate any kind of AI at all though. Interesting take.

[deleted]

[deleted]

That was actually my first instinct, but then you said it was generated by ChatGPT

Human succeeded at imitation! Guess one human W then lol

Everything is actually all bullshit but none of it was written by ChatGPT.

Everything is actually all bullshit but none of it was written by ChatGPT.

Tell me you’ve never heard of solipsism without saying the word.

2015: "AI won't beat top human players at Go for another decade."

2017: "AI won't beat top human players at Dota for another decade."

2019: "AI won't beat top human players at Starcraft for another decade."

2020: "AI won't be anything close to general intelligence for another decade."

2022: "It looks like general intelligence but that's not real intelligence, that'll take another decade."

ASI already exists, we're just being slowly made aware as not to cause a panic.

Yeah, I could tell this was generated immediately.

PSA: Please please keep in mind all of your prompts are viewable by OpenAI personnel. The things you are promoting are absolutely not private!