Recent comments in /f/singularity
turnip_burrito t1_j9bzfd6 wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
I see. How many orders of magnitude more will be needed?
Edit: A quick Google search returns 10^8 over 1 hour for breaking AES 256. Right now we're at 10^2 and I don't know how long it stays coherent (looks like around 10^-4 seconds). I see what you mean now for encryption.
How much do you need for quantum chemistry simulations? Quick Googlr search says the numbers are far lower to be useful there. Maybe 10^2 or 10^3 order of magnitude?
SoylentRox t1_j9bzbhm wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
It is not, and the number needed to do useful things like crack encryption is very far away.
turnip_burrito t1_j9bz6pt wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
But the number of qubits is increasing rapidly, I thought?
SoylentRox t1_j9bz1xs wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
Because the current ones cost a fortune and have almost no qbits, making them useless for most problems. There are nasty scaling laws that make adding more qbits nonlinearly harder.
giveuporfindaway t1_j9by5b0 wrote
Reply to comment by Agreeable_Bid7037 in Guys am I weird for being addicted to chatgpt ? by Transhumanist01
It really makes me depressed when I hear literally the same advice for multiple decades and people default to a just-world theory and think everything is within someone's power. I'm not harming anyone. Why can't you be happy for someone who says they'll get their romantic needs met through artificial means? How would you like it if you failed at something for decades and kept getting the exact same advice ad nauseam, which has never worked for you. Are you willing to accept that some people are going to fall through the cracks? I am and you're not and yet I'm the one who has to deal with the problem. The only reason people give these trite pieces of advice is because of their own psychological distress. If you admit that someone else is lonely through no fault of their own then you also have to admit that it can happen to you - and that is terrifying. Or you have to admit that you're a contributing factor to their loneliness.
Sigma_Atheist t1_j9bxzq7 wrote
People realized that they're no good for anything.
Bakagami- t1_j9bxcfa wrote
Reply to comment by cloudrunner69 in What happens when ASI meets Aliens? by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
Hope you're doing better by now. Thanks for the discussion, take care.
turnip_burrito t1_j9bx76r wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
Wait, why are quantum computers only possible after AGI? Researchers are doing fine without it so far, from my bystander view.
WolfgangBob t1_j9bw8jv wrote
Reply to comment by overturf600 in Hey guys, a couple of questions to see where your heads at! by TheChalaK-
"used to monitor productivity" - this sounds horrible like the AI will score and tell management if Bob was productive I'm the past week?
Yeah it's definitely more fun to create than "monitor". There so many ways AI help us all be more creative and productive.
turnip_burrito t1_j9bvgxz wrote
Reply to comment by MultiverseOfSanity in Brain implant startup backed by Bezos and Gates is testing mind-controlled computing on humans by Tom_Lilja
Yes this is one thing I'm worried about. Hopefully it doesn't happen.
Akashictruth t1_j9bvccd wrote
Reply to Just 50 days into 2023 and there's so much AI development. Compiled a list of the top headlines. by cbsudux
A ton of AI ‘happenings’ when this should be about development
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9bucch wrote
Still in the lab as far as it goes for the average consumer. But hopefully that changes over the next decade and it can result in tangible benefits for the average person.
sunplaysbass t1_j9bu5qk wrote
What kind of exchanges do you have with it?
LosingID_583 t1_j9bsf75 wrote
Reply to comment by HistoricallyFunny in Human Intelligence augmentation is probably more dangerous than regular AI by [deleted]
So if we augment everyone's IQ to be very high, then do you believe that there will no longer be any violence?
Cato_234 t1_j9bropc wrote
Reply to comment by hydraofwar in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
Also genetics
fluffy_assassins t1_j9bqyye wrote
Reply to comment by SlowCrates in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
That's a difference between skynet and digital overlords?
SoylentRox t1_j9bqmp7 wrote
As I understand it:
(1) current quantum computers are useless for AI so far (not enough qbits)
(2) they are useful for limited types of problems.
AI is useful for everything. So there's a lot more interest in it.
Like a lot of things, the actual tech order is probably:
high perf computers -> narrow AI -> AGI -> self replicating robots -> nanotechnology -> quantum computers
That is, we will not have large and useful quantum computers until we have nanotechnology, and we can't afford that without self replicating robots, and we can't make that without AGI, and so on.
BK_317 t1_j9bqdm4 wrote
Reply to Just 50 days into 2023 and there's so much AI development. Compiled a list of the top headlines. by cbsudux
"Prompt engineers making $350k" what?
Source on this? I Googled around and found nothing.
Iffykindofguy t1_j9bq1y8 wrote
Its bigger than ever fam youre just not paying attention
Practical-Mix-4332 t1_j9bpi0g wrote
Reply to comment by hydraofwar in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
Also cures for cancer, heart disease, and aging.
MrEloi t1_j9bp6js wrote
If Google are working on it, it will already be very advanced - but hidden in a back room.
They won't launch any products using the technology, just in case it disrupts their search income.
However, one day someone else will launch a related product .. and then Google will set up an emergency competitive product launch in Paris.
Google will spend at least $100 on this launch and will not actually show anything interesting.
SlowCrates t1_j9bp3p6 wrote
Reply to comment by fluffy_assassins in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
Fusion and quantum computing are the difference between Terminator's Skynet and having new digital overlords.
MechanicalBengal t1_j9bp31k wrote
Reply to comment by bubbleofelephant in Relevant Dune Quote by johnnyjfrank
because we’d call that a machine lead or main machine now, read the memo from HR
Agreeable_Bid7037 t1_j9bolhz wrote
Reply to comment by giveuporfindaway in Guys am I weird for being addicted to chatgpt ? by Transhumanist01
uhh dude. why not try some public places where you can hang out. I'm sure you'll meet some good people.
flying-tree-god t1_j9bzyva wrote
Reply to Relevant Dune Quote by johnnyjfrank
I'm ready to join the machines physically in the same way the cyborg generals did.