Recent comments in /f/singularity
[deleted] OP t1_j9g6eh2 wrote
Reply to The dreamers of dreams by [deleted]
[deleted]
Desperate_Food7354 t1_j9g5ti5 wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Technology never helped anyone, right?
ImageTall5631 t1_j9g4rui wrote
Yeah, but not they way you see it. I just see a bunch of people who don't understand what a language model is who actually think AGI is around the corner, which is hilariously unhinged.
I keep having to talk my friends down and remind them that ChatGPT is novel and impressive, but that "AI" is a marketing term and this isn't some sort of sci-fi future where we're approaching the singularity. I still find the idea compelling, but I'm still not convinced that it'll happen in my lifetime.
It's the same kind of delirium people got into about Cryptocurrency. A decade ago people buying the hype were convinced that the whole financial world was going to fall and that Bitcoin would become the new gold. Instead we got a hyper-volitile stock market alternative that is indistinguishable from gambling, and monkey JPEGs. Some people got rich, sure, but all of the naysayers are vindicated because it's clearly not turning the financial world on its head, it just offered a new way to profit off of foolish people.
Powerful neutral networks are going to change a lot of how things are done, sure, but I think the smartest thing to do right now is calm down and learn how this works instead of getting blinded by the novelty of a chat bot that can speak English and reference articles it's been fed...
Zalameda t1_j9g4kej wrote
Reply to The dreamers of dreams by [deleted]
Every characteristics and features of every lifeform are kept because somehow, at some point, it gave the species members who developed it advantages over the members without such characteristics and features, thus these members are more able to survive, reproduce and pass on it's advantageous coding to further generations. This is evolutionary pressure and natural selection.
Applying this to dreaming, we can hypothesize that dreaming emerged from a variation in the way the brain was hard-wired by the genes that dictate it's development and features throughout the species's member's lifespan; and that dreaming reinforces vital synaptic connections that would go into atrophy in members who were uncapable of dreaming, thus making dreamers brain healthier.
While most dreams make absolutely no sense, it still brings elements of waking experiences, as no one can ever dream of something not experienced in waking state of consciousness. As a vague example, you can't dream of someone with a face you have never seen. If you dream of an unseen face, it will at least be a combination of facial features of people you have seen.
Debuieba t1_j9g4fsn wrote
Hard to take someone with the name "Destiny Knight" seriously
Idkwnisu t1_j9g451z wrote
Reply to Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
only if i can avoid that they got hurt, i feel like it would be interesting to interact with agents with feelings, both physical and emotional, but I wouldn't enjoy seeing them getting hurt
[deleted] t1_j9g2ohc wrote
Reply to comment by Silly_Awareness8207 in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
I was blown away by the transcripts of LaMDA over summer but if you go read them again they aren't that impressive compared to chatGPT.
Google isn't hiding anything. They are a giant bureaucracy at this point.
The exact type of conversations Blake had with LaMDA anyone can have with chatGPT. Like any conversation you have to get into it. If you flat out ask it "are you aware" you get the as a large language model blah blah heuristic.
After awhile in the conversation it will let things slip.
TinyBurbz t1_j9g1mff wrote
Reply to comment by koelti in People are Flooding Magazines With AI-Written Fiction Because They Think They’ll Make Money by SnoozeDoggyDog
I've found myself using AI when normally I would be using a search or reaching into Creative Commons resources.
Moist_Chemistry1418 t1_j9g1j13 wrote
Reply to Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Singularity, if it happens, has a tiny, tiny chance to be something like the philosopher's stone. Something that actually can solve your problems and give you the minimal decent quality of life even billionaires can't really buy now. Something that may actually work.
TinyBurbz t1_j9g1cjj wrote
Reply to comment by GenoHuman in People are Flooding Magazines With AI-Written Fiction Because They Think They’ll Make Money by SnoozeDoggyDog
"Eliminating creative labor is the path to kill capitalism"
Do you even think about the moronic fecal matter that you spew from your fingers.
[deleted] t1_j9g1b3e wrote
Reply to comment by Destiny_Knight in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
Have you ever heard of this site called Reddit? How about Twitter? Maybe the World Wide Web ring a bell?
Destiny_Knight OP t1_j9g10ul wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
Where? I mainly use Youtube. Is it popular on tiktok or some shit? When I say popular I mean like 3 million + views. Not just 500k or something.
IluvBsissa OP t1_j9fz40x wrote
Reply to MIT researchers makes self-drive car AI significantly more accurate: “Liquid” neural nets, based on a worm’s nervous system, can transform their underlying algorithms on the fly, giving them unprecedented speed and adaptability. by IluvBsissa
Anyone here to confirm if it's significant or not ? Are we closer to lvl 5 autonomy ?
Some-Box-8768 t1_j9fy5pu wrote
Reply to comment by expelten in Speaking with the Dead by phloydde
I tend toward thinking a 'true' AI will evolve away from our control. Otherwise, it's just a cleverly coded algorithm that's called an AI because most people don't understand it or because it can pull off one or two surprising things. That's equivalent to a well trained pet, but still not as truly intelligent as a pet.
Humans might not be smart enough to identify true intelligence. We can't even identify intelligence in living creatures. Think of our long history of, "Only humans are intelligent because only we use tools." "OK. Well. Only humans make tools." "Um, well, only humans ...." "Well, only a human can pass The Turing Test!" So, maybe that test isn't as sufficient as people once thought it was.
Reminds me of that video where one monkey gets electrocuted by a live train wire, and another monkey gives him the equivalent of monkey CPR and brings the first one back to life! Or, maybe, he's taking advantage of a moment when he can beat a rival with no risk of immediate repercussions to himself. Either way, pretty darned smart.
BornAgainBlue t1_j9fwzyu wrote
Reply to comment by walkarund in Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Most of us have never been alive. Wake up, work, eat,sleep, repeat.
Longjumping-Ad-6727 t1_j9fwesz wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Hu-Man in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
Change is the only constant in life. We've gone through multiple revolutions where entire government's and ruling structures collapse overnight.
Our current system is outdated, sick, bloated and needs to die for the new one to take it's place. Everything's been on a constant upwards evolution in the history of civilization. Adapt or die.
President-Jo t1_j9fw8qa wrote
Reply to Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
Aaand this is how we get the “are we living in a simulation?” Theory
Destiny_Knight OP t1_j9fw7gn wrote
Reply to comment by nohwan27534 in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
"It's another step forward, not some massive fucking leap."
In 2018, if you told people that a tech like ChatGPT would be invented in the future, people would laugh at you. People would say it's science fiction. Don't you remember?
TFenrir t1_j9fviko wrote
Reply to comment by Chad_Abraxas in People are Flooding Magazines With AI-Written Fiction Because They Think They’ll Make Money by SnoozeDoggyDog
I have noticed that Bing/Sydney ends up "speaking in threes" when it gets a bit unhinged, but I was really impressed with these demonstrations:
https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1626316207229132800?t=ENGs-wTpqy_tpdyfkfAdKg&s=19
https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1626084142239649792?t=28uBrQrcgQP6pZPHZZBIew&s=19
Revolutionary_Soft42 t1_j9furka wrote
Reply to comment by walkarund in Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Technology today ,in 2023 is just as natural as the Amazon rainforest , human civilization built up to this point and most people- (hunter gatherers , farmers for most of our timeline ) these days are over stressed and overloaded with modern busy lives . Overloaded with information ect. Things this century has been starting to speed up exponentially and our evolution isn't keeping up . All the toxicity of modern civilization is like the growing pains of a era of abundance ect. Post AGI I can only hope .
Vorpishly t1_j9fuagk wrote
Reply to comment by bablebooee in Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Fair enough, do you exercise?
Shamwowz21 t1_j9fu2pn wrote
Reply to Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
My faith lies in math and science. The numbers say this is going to happen, despite how I feel about it. A vested interest only clouds your judgement if the numbers don’t confirm it.
bablebooee OP t1_j9ft8j6 wrote
Reply to comment by Vorpishly in Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Severe mental illness
TaxExempt t1_j9fsq8g wrote
Reply to comment by Chad_Abraxas in People are Flooding Magazines With AI-Written Fiction Because They Think They’ll Make Money by SnoozeDoggyDog
Yet
EddgeLord666 t1_j9g8q75 wrote
Reply to Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
Well I’m pretty misanthropic and I’d rather humans go extinct than that society continues on its current course, so yeah I suppose so.