Recent comments in /f/singularity
onyxengine t1_j9hgda1 wrote
Reply to comment by SpecialMembership in [WSJ] When Your Boss Is Tracking Your Brain by Tom_Lilja
Its such useful data, but I wouldn’t trust any entity that was profit motivated with it, and even then malicious or overly self serving actors could abuse the information.
ilive12 t1_j9hgc66 wrote
Reply to comment by Loriali95 in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence
Because it was an email about a school shooting, and they left in the message that it was made from ChatGPT. I get using ChatGPT as a starting point for something like this, but it looks like they pasted in something verbatim while barely even reading what they were sending, especially about a sensitive subject, thats pretty careless.
Practical-Mix-4332 t1_j9hg2cr wrote
Reply to comment by Buck-Nasty in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Is anything about gpt4 known? It seems like just a bunch of rumors and not even a release date
bass6c t1_j9hfy9w wrote
Reply to comment by Dankbubbles123 in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Chatgpt is based on gpt3 a 175 billion parameters model.
the_ml_guy t1_j9hft1u wrote
Prepared for the future? I have no clue on how to even prepare.
loopuleasa t1_j9hdhuo wrote
if you want a less douchy version of the guy, also on the topic of AI alignment, try Robert SK Miles
[deleted] t1_j9hd7zm wrote
Reply to comment by Idrialite in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
[deleted]
-emanresUesoohC- t1_j9hckqn wrote
Reply to comment by spryes in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
Other ant colonies don’t seek us out for retribution when we destroy a colony. If they did I think we’d be a lot more thorough. We probably couldn’t eliminate them completely, because we’re not a super intelligence.
Buck-Nasty t1_j9hch2c wrote
Reply to comment by Dankbubbles123 in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
The context window is apparently massive though, more than 10 times the size of gpt3, it could potentially write whole novels at that scale
https://mobile.twitter.com/transitive_bs/status/1628118163874516992?s=46&t=Biiqy66Cy9oPH8c1BL6_JQ
obfuscate555 t1_j9hcgnc wrote
Reply to comment by 3_Thumbs_Up in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
That's true
Dankbubbles123 t1_j9hbbp1 wrote
Reply to comment by Buck-Nasty in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Ah okay, nvm then. Sorry
dasnihil t1_j9hbb4s wrote
Reply to comment by Berke80 in Pardon my curiosity, but why doesn’t Google utilize its sister company DeepMind to rival Bing’s ChatGPT? by Berke80
https://github.com/deepmind/enn
deepmind is deep into LLMs but have no desires to capitalize on selling chat assistants/therapists.
Buck-Nasty t1_j9hb9az wrote
Reply to comment by Dankbubbles123 in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Gpt4s parameter counts aren't known yet
Dankbubbles123 t1_j9hb2j2 wrote
Reply to A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Eh, doesn’t chat gpt-4 have like 1.4 trillion parameters? It dwarfs this by almost 5 times.
Edit: turns out, I was wrong! :D
3_Thumbs_Up t1_j9hb1um wrote
Reply to comment by obfuscate555 in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
That seems like a very bad basis to dismiss something.
Someone else was wrong about a similar statement.
Everyone will be wrong about human extinction until someone is right. Your method of reasoning would never be able to distinguish the person who is right.
Loriali95 t1_j9haq35 wrote
Why does anyone care enough to the point where they got suspended?
Bman1117 t1_j9h9jgf wrote
It's just the nerds for now once they make a easy to use app for iphone / android others will catch on. The two biggest problems right now is how much they are nerfing the AI and how long the fear mongering witch hunt will last. Yeah, we have have burn them at the stake type humans in 2023 smh. Once we get past that it should get better again but that fear / dumbing down phase could last way longer then we want it to... I do hope I'm wrong about that but I have seen the way humans behave these days, It could be awhile before Chat GPT and others like it are great again.
Rep-love t1_j9h8q1g wrote
He is just a guy who really messes with the AI community. But the fact he has written AI doomsday stuff so much... It seems dishonest but I don't know how otherwise, he does not know as much about AI as he says he does. He is completely wrong about AI doomsday, it's just not connected to nearly as much as what he says.
[deleted] t1_j9h7m35 wrote
Reply to comment by PanzerKommander in Hey guys, a couple of questions to see where your heads at! by TheChalaK-
[removed]
nohwan27534 t1_j9h5wcb wrote
Reply to comment by Destiny_Knight in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
... you do know what subreddit you're in, right? This is the subreddit people are planning which appendages they might get replaced with cybernetics.
And again, chat gtp isn't cyber jesus.
MightyDickTwist t1_j9h584s wrote
Reply to Pardon my curiosity, but why doesn’t Google utilize its sister company DeepMind to rival Bing’s ChatGPT? by Berke80
Different objectives. They could do that, if Google told them to. But they’re focusing on other things as well, like AlphaFold, Reinforcement Learning, Robotics, Medical applications, and even things like nuclear fusion.
They have their own answer to ChatGPT. They also do research on LLMs… but keep in mind that DeepMind does not develop products. They do research.
Google is the one that needs to develop products.
headypete42033 t1_j9h5071 wrote
Reply to The dreamers of dreams by [deleted]
would be interesting if somehow tech made it possible to easily lucid dream where we can control those dreams. would be able to live whatever lifetime we want in a single night or even multiple lives in a single night.
Spire_Citron t1_j9h4m38 wrote
Reply to comment by CubeFlipper in Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
I think we understand these systems well enough to know that just having knowledge about them isn't enough. We have experience with them going wrong in humans. You can lose the ability to feel pain if the physical structures that enable that are damaged. Knowledge won't help you there, no matter how much you have, if you don't have working nerves. Now, it might be possible to design something in an AI that mimics those systems, but I think that would have to be a very intentional act. It couldn't just be something that happens when the AI has learnt enough about pain unless it also has the ability to alter its own systems and decides to design such a thing for itself.
GPT-5entient t1_j9h3swq wrote
Reply to comment by diabeetis in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
The Roko's basilisk fiasco was hilarious.
hydraofwar t1_j9hgim5 wrote
Reply to comment by Buck-Nasty in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
A credible researcher had commented that ChatGPT can write code, and GPT-4 could write entire programs.