Genuinely curious, is the whole point completely undermined by contracting an outside PR person for a draft of a public announcement?

Perhaps never having to innovate again

My disappointment is unmeasurable and my day is ruined.

But then they wouldn’t be able to say that the AI beats them and it wouldn’t be as flashy of a publication. Don’t you know how academia works?

I'm sorry, but as an AI Language Model, I do not have feelings to be considered "okay". Is there any other question I can help you with?

Serious, read the paper.

Can't imagine where we'll be in 10 more years of innovation..

Are you joking or serious ?

As a non-programmer, i tried asking it to change one small addition to an indicator in tradingview and i had to keep giving it the errors i got and did additional searches on google until i figured it out. At the end, all i changed was just two lines of code and it took me a long time.

Basically, what i mean is that the person giving the prompts already needs to have some programming knowledge to get help.

Even if it becomes more advanced, i bet you'd need workers to know how to give it prompts (or have unique ai prompters as a new position) to get the best outcome.

I think it's true for ai art. I see great ai art online but when i do it, it usually comes out far worse. It's when i realize that if they are going to replace some lower level cheap artist, they'd still need some ai art prompter to know what keywords to give it and what filter to use to get the best art, and you'd also probably need some other person to actually sort through the outputs to see which best fits their needs.

For those basic stock pictures, it doesn't really change much. Imagine if an outlets is rushing out articles, and they write one on how drinking water is healthy and they need an imagine of a woman drinking water. Seems cheaper and easier to just choose one with their stock images subscription.

And if they need something really unique and special for a main product, they can't just let some middle manager type a prompt and use that. They have to call the prompt guy (or maybe more realistically, they'll outsource it to an ai generator company who has humans that receive what the company needs, they then do the promoting, choosing the best, and editing it to provide them the image that fits their needs.

Basically, for every job they do away with, they'll just create a new human need.

This is interesting because the questions seem to be reasoning based, which is much more impressive than some of the other tests AI have done well at that are more based on knowing a lot of information, something you'd expect a LLM to excel at beyond the abilities of a typical human.

Where can I get one? I'll take 20

rip, they should've included expert performance as well then

lol "hey kids, I'd like to bring to your attention that there's this reaally big super handy tool that will write entire essays for you, please DO NOT use it!"

Yes, I said "when the order of magnitude jumps by 10x or more".

Hence a jump by one order of magnitude, (10x), or two orders of magnitude (100x), or three orders of magnitude (1000x).

You can jump by more than one order of magnitude. Diabeetus' comment is wrong, because the order of magnitude can grow more than one order.

Like what would happen if like 4% of global GDP was put into this?

Makes me wonder what it'd look like if it was as big as gpt-3

If these models are so smol and efficient, why are they not released ?? I just don't get it. I thought PaLM was kept private because it was too costly to run to be profitable...

[deleted]

You are wrong. It’s not experts. It’s randos on mechanical Turk.

impressed lol

yup and correcr me if I'm wrong, but those aren't average humans either, those are experts in their fields

Those are two and three order of magnitudes.

Are you angry or impressed ?

Germany saving Europe again ! No wait..

Heck no; I already feel guilty when I accidentally run over someone in GTA or have to kill an animal in Minecraft, and I know they are just unfeeling programs.