Recent comments in /f/singularity
duboispourlhiver t1_j9jhxrd wrote
Reply to comment by GlobusGlobus in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
What a time to be alive
arckeid t1_j9jhopg wrote
Reply to comment by BuildingCastlesInAir in Researchers were able to uniquely identify VR users with 94% accuracy from only 100 seconds of motion data, using anonymized data from 50K+ Beat Saber players by Tom_Lilja
Good to know, if this start to be a thing the way to go is to be anonymous since the beginning.
Artanthos t1_j9jhm3l wrote
Reply to comment by Bakagami- in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
You are setting the bar as anything less than perfect is failure.
By that standard, most humans would fail. And most experts are only going to be an expert in one field, not every field, so they would also fail by your standards.
Ylsid t1_j9jgvso wrote
Reply to comment by WeedWacker25 in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Boo
WeedWacker25 t1_j9jgt2d wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
I had to do some research about this. I found that the transformers are mostly open source, but the trained models are not.
DonOfTheDarkNight t1_j9jgped wrote
Reply to comment by No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
It's interesting to see how dismissive you are of PhDs not being able to use standard Dev tools
ertgbnm t1_j9jgoi9 wrote
Reply to comment by IluvBsissa in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Read the questions on scienceQA. They are hot and not hot dog type questions
scapestrat0 t1_j9jg3dl wrote
Reply to comment by ground__contro1 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Because of AGI or 'cuz we'll be ded
Akimbo333 t1_j9jg1gr wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Yeah those multimodal capabilities are intense!
Akimbo333 t1_j9jfw9i wrote
Reply to comment by redpnd in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Oh yeah I agree!!!
unholymanserpent t1_j9jfpjq wrote
Reply to comment by Atheios569 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Pets to AI
[deleted] t1_j9jfgzp wrote
Reply to comment by coumineol in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
[deleted]
Ylsid t1_j9jeu7o wrote
Reply to comment by Nico_ in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
I just hope stable diffusion isn't a one off
Neurogence t1_j9jef7k wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
What is the "catch" here? It sounds too good to be true
redpnd t1_j9je11m wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Not hard for a multimodal model to outperform a text only model on multimodal tasks..
Although still impressive, imagine what a scaled up version will be able to accomplish!
Lawjarp2 t1_j9jdxur wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
It's multiple choice, choosing among 4 options is easier because you just have to consider the 4 possibilities and answer is among the 4 possibilities. But most conversations are open ended with possibilities branching out to insane levels.
coumineol t1_j9jdre7 wrote
Reply to comment by rising_pho3nix in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Can't imagine where we'll be in 10 more years of innovation.
coumineol t1_j9jdp9z wrote
Reply to comment by IluvBsissa in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Really? So the time has come where a small-scale AI model being smarter than "ordinary" humans is not impressive.
Nico_ t1_j9jd8d4 wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
If AIs can be optimzed to run on a single graphics cards there is no controlling this.
hylianovershield t1_j9jd6x3 wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Could someone explain the significance of this to a normal person? 🤔
ground__contro1 t1_j9jbr1p wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
I mean, humans have lived basically our entire lives, as a species and often individually, governed by forces we couldn’t really explain at the time. This still seems different though. Seems like no turning back. But maybe that’s been true for a long time.
turnip_burrito t1_j9jbkjo wrote
Reply to comment by diabeetis in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
I think the intended meaning is quite clear by context, but your point is taken.
diabeetis t1_j9jb6wd wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
I mean who cares but I think the standard way of expressing that thought would be "jumps by 2 or 3 orders of magnitude"
D2MAH t1_j9jb0sf wrote
Reply to comment by gONzOglIzlI in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
I’m not quite sure if quantum computing is even needed for AGI. It’s so far behind and we’re so far ahead.
duboispourlhiver t1_j9ji6qe wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Yes, the risk is to be over fitted for this test. I've read that too about that paper but haven't taken the time to make my own opinion. I think it's impossible to judge if this benchmark is telling or not about the model's quality without studying this for hours