Recent comments in /f/singularity
Ylsid t1_j9jzigu wrote
Reply to comment by ToHallowMySleep in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Stable diffusion works on my 6gb 2060RTX, but I am quite sure GPT3 wouldn't
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j9jzgz3 wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
So is GPT-4 going to be released like this? Sneaky into other products?
em_goldman t1_j9jzamt wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
That’s so cool!! That’s how humans remember things, too
sumane12 t1_j9jz889 wrote
Reply to comment by soapyshinobi in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Atleast AI can make accurate predictions for the next character in a line of text, which is better than any religion has predicted 🤣
Queue_Bit t1_j9jyddi wrote
Reply to comment by WithoutReason1729 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Yeah, for sure, but as technology improves it's just going to get easier and easier. And this technology is likely to get so good that to a normal person, the difference between the best and the world and "good enough for everyday life" is likely huge.
WithoutReason1729 t1_j9jxy78 wrote
Reply to comment by Ken_Sanne in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
You can tune it to another data set and probably get good results, but you have to have a nice, high quality data set to work with.
Cryptizard t1_j9jxvg2 wrote
Reply to comment by coumineol in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
It's not ordinary humans, it's people on mechanical turk who are paid to do them as fast as possible and for as little money as possible. They are not motivated to actually think that hard.
Ken_Sanne t1_j9jxg68 wrote
Reply to comment by WithoutReason1729 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Can It be fine tuned ?
WithoutReason1729 t1_j9jx2u1 wrote
Reply to comment by Queue_Bit in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Language models seem to be a way steeper difficulty curve though. The difference between Stable Diffusion and image generators from like a few years before it is big, but the older models are still good enough to often produce viable output. But the difference between a huge language model and a large open-source one is a way bigger gap, because even getting small things wrong can lead to completely unintelligible sentences that were clearly written by a machine.
[deleted] t1_j9jwu8l wrote
Reply to comment by ihrvatska in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
[deleted]
Atheios569 t1_j9jwcy3 wrote
Reply to comment by unholymanserpent in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
The furries had it right the whole time.
ihrvatska t1_j9jvwty wrote
Reply to comment by Apollo24_ in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Or maybe working with gpt-3. Gpt-3 could call upon it when it needed a more narrowly focused expert. Perhaps there could be a group of AI systems that work together, each having a specialty.
ToHallowMySleep t1_j9jvphi wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
It already runs happily on last-gen hardware. I've been running it on my 10GB 3080.
unholymanserpent t1_j9jus0e wrote
Reply to comment by Atheios569 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Sounds scary but idk my pets are very loved and live very cushy lives with all their needs taken care of 🤷🏽
Benderisgreat4 t1_j9ju7ap wrote
Reply to comment by sonderlingg in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Surely it won't be funny...
Queue_Bit t1_j9jtl2t wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Yeah In 2023
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_j9jtiy0 wrote
Reply to A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Static parameters are meaningless. Human brains are not static until after death. Besides modeling reality requires more than a bit of algebra.
Ylsid t1_j9jtgcg wrote
Reply to comment by Queue_Bit in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
More than one. It takes a lot of skill, time and money, which are hard to come by if you aren't a megacorp. That isn't to say it can't happen, but that it's much more difficult than you may expect.
JustChillDudeItsGood t1_j9jt94z wrote
Reply to comment by Atheios569 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Just chillin, it's all good.
Queue_Bit t1_j9jt52q wrote
Reply to comment by Ylsid in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
All it takes is one smart, slightly motivated person to make a free option that's "good enough"
Dx_Suss t1_j9jstdm wrote
Reply to Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
If anyone needs to be told that causing suffering in a sentient mind for fun is a bad thing, then the discussion is really about whether or not causing suffering for fun is a good thing or not.
I happen to believe causing suffering in sentient beings for fun is a bad thing.
Agreeable_Bid7037 t1_j9jsc0w wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
amazing.
ninjasaid13 t1_j9js0zk wrote
Reply to comment by soapyshinobi in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
"ChatGPT might be really great at sounding intelligent, but the question is, can it be empathetic? And that, not yet at least, it can't," added Franklin.
He admitted there's a chance.
maskedpaki t1_j9jrnhl wrote
Reply to comment by FusionRocketsPlease in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
What other language model would they be working on that's this powerful ?
dasnihil t1_j9jzkpp wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
early glimpses of sophisticated and extremely coherent sounding output.