> That's about 30k words.

Dude give me this, but for a character Ai style chat or NovelAI style RP

It's still garbage. They improved coversation limit by 1, big freaking deal. I won't use it until they remove conversation limits completely.

Occam's Razor. There's no reason to think I'm different from any other human, so it's reasonable to conclude they're just as sentient. But there's a ton of differences between myself and a computer.

And if we go by what the computer says it feels, well, then conscious feeling AI is already here. Because we have multiple AI, such as Bing, Character AI, and Chai, that all claim to have feelings and can display emotional intelligence. So either this is the bar and we've met it, or the bar needs to be raised. But if the bar needs to be raised, then where does it need to be raised to? What's the metric?

Well, it would also depend on the suffering of a sentient being of your creation. You create this consciousness from scratch and invest a lot of money into it. It's not like a child, which is brought about by biological processes. AI is designed from the ground up for a particular purpose.

Also these beings aren't irreplaceable like biological beings. You can always just make more.

Is it overfit to the questions on the test? i.e. has it seen the same quesitons in training?

This is interesting. I think people are rightfully upset because these administrators’ specific roles are to support the student community. The aftermath of the shooting would be a time where their duties are of the utmost significant. The problem isn’t that they used AI—they could have used a template from a previous tragedy themselves (that’s basically what ChatGPT did)—the problem is that they did not reflect on the incident themselves and craft a genuine message that specifically pertained to the school and the students. Instead, they essentially did a “copy-pasta” which is insincere and beneath their roles. It probably would have been better if they sent a delayed message. It is acceptable to use a template/AI in many other cases such as a mass email about a fire-drill testing or club event, but a school shooting is a uniquely shocking and evil tragedy that deserves time, sensitivity, and care. Using a template is simply careless. I believe they should be suspended. I honestly can’t believe no one was like “maybe this isn’t a great idea,” or “we should give it more thought.”

Edits: Spelling, clearly I didn’t use ChatGPT lol

Eliezer Yudkowsky is not an AI researcher, engineer, or creator. He's a writer on the subject of AI that gives commentary and opinions on the subject. Anyone can write about AGI "safety." He hasn't contributed anything practical to the field, or anything to advance AI.

Just because humans (usually) treat pets well doesn't mean AIs will though - or for that matter, find any use in pets at all

Not what we were even talking about dude. Especially when you shifted the conversationto begin with... We were talking about the 1% of people who theoretically could have their life extended, but still would require a substantial series of effects for that to occur. Is that worth the suffering of the other 99% of people?

Künstliche Allgemeine Intelligenz 🇩🇪

There will be both good and bad that comes out as we get closer to AGI, and attain AGI, just like and other technological revolution. To paint it as "either" dystopian or utopian is naive.

That's prejudice. You don't know that.

Im from germany and I know germany is incompetent anything related to IT, its all about old economy. Don’t get any hopes up.

More training is better and smaller networks train faster.

We've already got that. What else do you have?

His central thesis just seems akin to the South Park underpants gnomes to me. Like (1) develop an AGI with superintelligence and then (2) "???" and then (3) humanity is doomed! Not in disagreement with the premise per se, but the "everybody suddenly falls over dead" thing is just so preposterous to me on a material or pragmatic level. But perhaps I just lack the imagination to see how physical agency could be achieved without us noticing it at all and then just "pulling the plug" if you will...

Hopefully sleep.

Just to be clear, from developer perspective, is this just "unlimited" API access?

General vs specific intelligence.

Think of when you ask your brain what is the answer to 5x5.

Did you add 5 each time or did you do a lookup, or perhaps an approximate answer?

I'm asking this too.

[deleted]

An a100 sure! If you got three!

Am I reading this wrong? Is the dataset used to train this model the same dataset used to test it? Not saying that's not a valid method, but that certainly makes it less impressive vs generalist models that can still get decent scores...

maybe a 5090. ;)

Exactly. It's very difficult to get the lead on megacorps is my point.