And what would the US gonna do about it?

You can't invade China and you can't nuke China without ending the world. China is pretty safe. China can nuke every city in the US.

Stop anthropomorphizing an algorithm, its not sentient, its basically very complex multivariate regression statistics used to find patterns in information and text and used to generate new random text. Text which is only correct most of the time because the information patterns it found are obvious enough.

There is no thought process going on, its not actively reasoning about anything.

Yep, this will be the first widespread use of it. Fine tunned chat gpt will most likely generate all written communication. This will reduce the workforce need by at least 50%. And its only the start.

Might not even get AGI before ASI.

You'd need an narrow AI that is better at architecting AI's than humans and the rest is history.

You're living in a dream world if you don't think the US would act to prevent China from exploiting an AGI against them. Which it would, if it had one. (Just like the USA would, if it had one).

UBI? Please. Never gonna happen. Listen to the GOP nutjobs whine about "communism" in the USA now, for basic shit like social security and medicare. They would have aneurysms if someone was legit pushing UBI.

The GLM models are from China and open sourced.

I don't see any intelligence at all at this point, unless we believe that if it looks, sounds, and smells like intelligence, it probably is. In other words, if Joe on the street can be fooled by algorithms, AI is for all practical purposes here now.

My understanding is that there's a view that although AGI will be produced by human engineering, ASI would be produced iteratively by the AGI. So, when we talk about engineering projects to create intelligence, the goal of those projects is simply AGI - or at least, that's the point at which the further progress of tech is unpredictable enough not to be on anyone's balance sheet. So all these labs - OpenAI, Deepmind - say that they are working towards AGI, and that's the term that gets used when talking about those projects and their progress in the media.

No. Once an LLM gets a keyword a lot of related stuff will come up in probabilities. Also you can go backwards on reasoning. This makes it easier for an LLM to answer if trained for this exact scenario.

I think it's possible for an AI to break its own rules in unexpected ways without it needing to be particularly intelligent, especially with something as complex as this. Giving it rules it can't break is the hard part.

So basically GPT3+ is like a microbrain that is as good as dead. Human brains have way more 'parameters' and they change in value all the time. Otherwise it would be hard to have an original thought. So the ramifications are pretty trivial.

In this case driving was a toy example.

In the future we might use this technology for autonomous driving or we might not due to say problems with explain-ability . Too early to tell.

This might be good or bad news for AI in general since this is supporting a technology very different than current statistics-based narrow AI. Biologically inspired NNs could take off and people could slow the narrow AI research which is also very important.

In my opinion Narrow AI will always out-compete General AI on some specific tasks.

Think of this as internal combustion vs steam... it did a lot of good for the engines but almost eliminated the research on steam engines. Whereas steam turbines are still used at the power plants and this research could be useful.

Because you are not an llm

In github, I only can download the base model, is the large model private? But I think it will be more useful to me if the model is not sicence QA instead of a game player model.

Singularity is approaching fast.

People might not realize that a sufficiently advanced LLM can simulate Ai researchers and programmers. For example, "simulate a thousand of the top Ai researchers, discussing and then programming an AGI".

This reminds me of that Westworld moment where he’s talking about the frustrations trying to emulate humans, until he realized he just needs to use a lot less code (something like 18 lines).

“Turns out we’re just not that complicated.”

[removed]

You mean like a LoRA?

[deleted]

I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.🙏

If we're wiped out, I hope whatever replaces us is sentient at least. Dead algos roaming the universe feels kinda dumb.

Inb4 The Germans literally create Funny-Bot

So what, what is the US gonna do if China gets ahead? And vice versa?

You can't nuke China without ending the world. And China can't nuke the US. It has always been this way for 50 years.

The only solution to internal trouble is the eradication of capitalism. That is a good thing we all should work towards anyway in human evolution.

What did the government do during Covid Lockdowns? Handed out cash left and right. People remember. The next sucessfull political party will demand UBI then.

Yes they actually do.

I’d say AI might be the only way to solve nuclear weapons risk. Without AI we’d probably end up using them sooner or later. In the span of a few hundred years probably almost guaranteed, the only thing that will stop it is some other very advanced technology and AI.