A lot of people agreed with Hitler too, is that the barometer for censorship now?

LMAO you people just want to censor because its something you personally dont like. Go to China

A lot of people agreed with Hitler too, is that the barometer for censorship now?

LMAO you people just want to censor because its something you personally dont like. Go to China

"There is infinite demand for deeply credentialed experts who will tell you that everything is fine, that machines can’t think, that humans are and always will be at the apex, people so commited to human chauvinism they will soon start denying their own sentience because their brains are made of flesh and not Chomsky production rules. All that’s left of the denialist view is pride and vanity. And vanity will bury us."

Holy shit.

Reddit works by engagement. If it isn’t a good post you won’t see it often. Stop being a pretentious dick. Where’s your Phd? I’m sure you provide soo much insight.

seems reasonable, how the f- else are we going to fund some sort of semblance of a UBI

The lowest common denominator ruins a lot of things. People who just wanna click some buttons can easily pad out a subreddit of any size and put low-effort crap on its front page, day after day. And they'll say 'well why not make a subreddit for just you whiners,' even if the sub they're in was already a replacement that got overrun again.

I suppose we will stop working for a living at that point. Which is basicly the end of capitalism.

Most problems in life are related to money or the lack of it. Having that problem solved, opens doors in all directions.

My dream world would be unemployment for all. Doing what you like and enjoy with good company, not what is required of you to be able to see the next day.

So are the cries to ban content that harms nobody.

Would you prefer people not telling you something is AI generated?

Never mind, people are having conniptions over that too.

Ah, a way to skirt the law against using stolen images and abuse human copyright with impunity! And people wonder why artists are concerned with this glowing future you all are so eager for. Sounds positively utopian.

It may not be impressive, unless you consider "how" the answer is derived. When you search Google, you'll receive information that pertains to the question you have asked. Google searches an index of some kind and provides links to the most relevant sites it can find.

When you ask ChatGPT a question, it generates a response by referencing the model that was used to train the algorithm. It is true that it's predicting the next tokens in the sequence, but it also demonstrates at an understanding of the world that search engines do not exhibit. This is why, at this point, large language models are subject to fantasy, they get math wrong a lot of the time, and only get a "C" on some university level physics questions. It is also why, in the near future, they will improve and surpass human abilities on most tasks.

Whoa just like as in the movie Minority Report lol!! (The movie depicts vertical commuting as you called it)

Oh ok thanks , that was a good explanation. That Wikipedia article came up when I googled my question but I wasn’t sure if the article was relevant or not

Personally I like reading them since I don't have the patience myself to mess with it just to bypass the censorship.

But it is the case, because that is what it is doing.

The AI software companies waive copyright and say the image is the user's.

theres r/chatgpt if you’re like me and love the random gpt conversations

The posts, surely, not the posters.

why implement the ubi after everyone's poor?

The community does and it seems like they mostly agree with me not you.

I find your posts interesting, it says [removed]. Any way I could read it?

Microchips of the past were mostly 2d. Like a printed circuit board. Today and more in the future they are more 3 dimesional, like a circuit board that has circuits at multiple levels. If my memory and understanding is correct, current state of the art flash memory chips are 100 levels deep. Can we make that a 1000? CPU chips aren't taking advantage as much of this multi level architecture. Same with GPU (graphic processor units) or TPU (tensor processing units) chips.

3d comes in multiple flavors. Here is an example of stacking the chips: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-dimensional_integrated_circuit

An analogy is cities. Today's cities are mostly 2d. Traffic happens at the ground level. In the future we will have cities were commuting can occur at multiple vertical levels and we can call them 3d cities.

For a thinking machine a smaller machine is more efficient than a larger machine, so yes quantum effects are very relevant and used in design of today's microchips. For example: the problem of quantum tunnelling.

Your reading list sounds like a slow descent into dementia and faulty reasoning.

Speaking of that, I haven't noticed much algorithmic improvement in past couple of decades, except maybe some niche cases. If anything, less optimised algorithm are used now, because hardware can handle that.

What does Kurzweil mean by “three-dimensional computing”