Recent comments in /f/singularity
SoylentRox t1_j9qubx5 wrote
Reply to comment by Wyrade in Stephen Wolfram on Chat GPT by cancolak
My bad, I checked the dates in a hurry.
PM_ME_A_STEAM_GIFT t1_j9qu8a0 wrote
Reply to New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
> ‘HLMI’ was defined as follows:
The following questions ask about ‘high–level machine intelligence’ (HLMI). Say we have ‘high-level machine intelligence’ when unaided machines can accomplish every task better and more cheaply than human workers. Ignore aspects of tasks for which being a human is intrinsically advantageous, e.g. being accepted as a jury member. Think feasibility, not adoption.
I think the bottleneck here is robotics. We might have human-level intelligence in a digital-only form a lot sooner than we will be able to build a humanoid robot with human-level dexterity, speed and strength. And it will be even longer until such a robot is cheaper than human labor.
Wyrade t1_j9qu3o8 wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Stephen Wolfram on Chat GPT by cancolak
Don't you mean 5 weeks ago?
SirIsaacBacon t1_j9qt9ml wrote
Reply to comment by redroverdestroys in Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
... you alright?
[deleted] t1_j9qt3c3 wrote
Reply to comment by sticky_symbols in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9qt076 wrote
Reply to New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
[deleted]
Nano-Brain t1_j9qsxa5 wrote
Reply to Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
My issue with censoring posts is that it only leads to issues. Someone on the backend has to decide what can be posted. In the beginning it seems ok. But then it becomes hard to determine the threshold for which posts to cutoff.
Hodoss t1_j9qstth wrote
Reply to comment by Peribanu in And Yet It Understands by calbhollo
This was cross posted in r/bing, that’s how I got here haha. Still browsing.
I’ve already seen a bunch of spooky/awesome examples, but I was under the assumption that the AI is always acting as a character interacting with another character. So this particular one is really blowing my mind, as it seems the AI somehow understood this might be a real situation, and cared enough to break the "input suggestion" character and insist on saving the child.
sticky_symbols t1_j9qsmt6 wrote
Reply to New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
Wow. I just don't get it.
This was done before chatGPT and most people hadn't used gpt 3 before that.
Ambiwlans t1_j9qsmlk wrote
Reply to comment by Nanaki_TV in Bernie Sanders proposes taxes on robots that take jobs by Scarlet_pot2
If you held the coins for over 1yr, you did your taxes wrong.
[deleted] t1_j9qsj4q wrote
Reply to What do you expect the most out of AGI? by Envoy34
[deleted]
ervdm t1_j9qshuy wrote
Reply to Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
What video is this from?
phoenixmusicman t1_j9qsafb wrote
Reply to Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
That background looks like New Zealand
phoenixmusicman t1_j9qs7pt wrote
Reply to comment by qrayons in US Copyright Office: You Can't Copyright Images Generated Using AI by vadhavaniyafaijan
/u/silicon-dreamer sue this man
blueSGL t1_j9qru8n wrote
Reply to New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
I want to know how many peoples timelines predicted ChatGPT or Dalle2 or Alphafold happening when they did.
Otherwise it's just the classic "predict a game changer is going to happen once I've retired"
Brashendeavours t1_j9qrto6 wrote
Reply to comment by timespender in Been reading Ray Kurzweil’s book “The Singularity is Near”. What should I read as a prerequisite to comprehend it? by Golfer345
Read the post as there is no technical jargon to comprehend that OP already has the book….
abc-5233 t1_j9qrsjh wrote
Reply to Been reading Ray Kurzweil’s book “The Singularity is Near”. What should I read as a prerequisite to comprehend it? by Golfer345
One thing I don't like about Kurzweil's take on the Singularity, is that he attributes it to "The Law of Accelerating Returns", that is not an actual law, but something I think he invented.
For a much more scientific and thorough explanation of why the increased complexity will lead to the Singularity I recommend "The Romance of Reality" by Bobby Azarian, where he explains how it is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (entropy increases in closed systems), is the one that predicts the increased complexity in open systems.
It is far more scientific and accurate.
xott t1_j9qrok6 wrote
Reply to comment by RepresentativeAd3433 in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence
Well, seeing as we still walk in spite of cars, that's probably an overblown worry.
redroverdestroys t1_j9qrmvz wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
LMAO no, its YOU guys who need to make a new sub.
It's not being censored, you are crying about wanting it to be censored, but guess what?
YOU HAVE NO POWER HERE!
You are the one that needs to go make a new sub and stop complaining and mucking up this sub with useless cry baby threads.
the actual audacity on you weirdos is NUTS to me. GO MAKE ANOTHER SUB IF YOU DONT LIKE IT!
All you are going to do is make people like me now make these threads more. Just ignore the threads if don't like them! Why is that so hard for you to do? Why would you rather cry about censoring them instead?
Stop thinking you have any power here, Donald Trump.
edit: this PYSCHO blocked me on here, but he is crying because he can't just ignore threads he doesn't like. Dude needs help like for real.
LikeYouNeverHadWings t1_j9qrfs1 wrote
Yeah but then wouldnt that tax be absorbed into the cost of the product and then passed on to the individual consumer that just lost his job because of that AI?
Cryptizard t1_j9qresh wrote
Reply to comment by redroverdestroys in Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
That’s literally the point of this entire fucking website. People make subs for a topic they like and moderate it to keep it on topic. If you want to see this and the other people here don’t, make a new sub. Regardless, it’s not wanted here.
mindbleach t1_j9qr85u wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
"Nothing popular can be wrong!," says dull troll. "How dare you have preferences, unless you're a super genius."
Fuck your abusive rhetoric, fuck your irrational motivations, and to the extent allowed by any sub with well-meaning but ultimately harmful demands for unearned respect, fuck you personally.
A stranger on the internet dryly criticized the actions of large groups. You spat venom about imaginary individual failings. Re-evaluate how you use the internet, you wound-up patience vampire.
Peribanu t1_j9qr33r wrote
Reply to comment by Hodoss in And Yet It Understands by calbhollo
There are many more such examples posted in r/bing.
warseb t1_j9qq2m1 wrote
Reply to comment by YaAbsolyutnoNikto in Bernie Sanders proposes taxes on robots that take jobs by Scarlet_pot2
And make sure the tax is properly redistributed into more societal productive capacity.
PM_ME_A_STEAM_GIFT t1_j9qut2d wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in What do you expect the most out of AGI? by Envoy34
To think that we might be one of the last generations having to work to live...