The way you explain it here means that you do understand it in laymen’s terms. You could go deeper but then you’re going beyond the laymen.

If they are using shared infrastructure that has to be paid for somehow then they should be having some sort of tax, why not? The resources have to be paid for somehow to continue.

If we could do this on a global scale it might make sense. It sounds like what he actually wants to do is export the jobs we haven't already given away to China.... Too Germany.

It's like flipping through a stack of photographs. If I'm not in any of them, and nobody's having sex, I don't care.

The central argument is regarding the timeline of AGI. The incorporation (or not) of effectors and sensors is irrelevant.

Most “businesspeople” aren’t really any more informed on tech matters than the average American

Which reason AGI would use to escapce the human control.

If AGI is under human control, I would think it was stupid and laugh at it.

It's not "absurd." Or at least, it isn't unless you misconstrue what's actually being said. Eliminating hallucinations and being perfect and omniscient aren't the same thing. It's not about being 100 percent perfect, but simply that the points for which It's docked won't be the results of hallucinations. Maybe it won't know an answer, and will say "I don't know." Maybe it will have an opinion on something subjective that's debatable, but that opinion doesn't include hallucination and is simply a shit take like human beings might have.

more like 100% chance lmao

Monetizing a lot of things that shouldn't be.

They're saying physical labor via robotics might be the last part of human capability to be replaced, which to be fair could be considered a form of intelligence.

Next up: Images using Photoshop. Then pencils.

Maybe, who can tell?

I am particularly excited for transhumanism. Imagine a world in which you can be whatever you want, in the most literal sense of the phrase. Oh and space colonization, which relates to transhumanism, because once we are capable of living there without a life support system, colonizing space becomes relatively trivial.

It's a meme by the poster

Human level intelligence is typically not represented well by any measure of physical dexterity or speed.

What are you trying to say?

>This was done before chatGPT

GPT3 is very similar to ChatGPT, to my knowledge, and that had been out since 2020, 2 years before the survey.

>most people hadn't used gpt 3 before that.

The people who were surveyed were researchers and experts who most likely had familiarity with GPT3.

I don't really think the advent of ChatGPT would have shortened timelines all that much had the survey been conducted after it was released, if I'm being honest.

if he is it would be hans morovec who was right.

Also please stop telling me about your dreams. Please.

“It was like my house, but it wasn’t my house. Except it was, you know what I mean?”

Kill me.

Tom Scott from 2 weeks ago

Whst makes you think that atheists don’t understand the logic behind their beliefs? Religion is based off of myth and atheism is evidence based and logical.

Whst makes you think that atheists don’t understand the logic behind their beliefs? Religion is based off of myth and atheism is evidence based and logical.

Singularity is AI smart enough to make a better AI. That has always been the goalpost

Intelligence:

1. Automation from intelligence. A new golden age.
2. Ability to terraform Mars and Venus.
3. Send probes to other star systems, and later send machines to terraform them.
4. Spread life throughout the universe.
5. No more over population because AGI will supply low cost mates.
6. 3d cities.
7. An end to absurdities like climate change disaster and standard model particle physics (there are only standing EM waves).

[deleted]