source?

I don't understand how he can't even resolve his own "copyright issues" of Stable Diffusion, yet he's acting like he's "knocking down the ladder" of MLLM's achievements. I'd hope he'd write an open letter to the many artists who have blamed Stable Diffusion rather than this hypocrisy.

Yup, they're all playing catch up, including Emad (the stable diffusion guy),

They know if GPT5 is released within 1-2 years, it would be game over for them in terms of catching up. It would take a while for them to even recreate gpt 4 or even gpt 3.

Even Google can't seem to catch up. Bard is like a GPT2.

'Regulation of Art' isn't regulation so much as a dynamic that hinges on cost of production and niche market interest.

Take for example a new site that wants to install a public sculpture, the leads for the site are not going to just prompt 'Public Art' and 3d-print. The stakeholders and relationships involved are a real thing and influence.

Personally as someone who loves playing around with AI-Art its potential variety is still very small compared to the scope of creative work that human's get up to. Interested people will maintain their sensitivity to the difference.

Amen to this. Today has been blessedly quiet for once but it's still early.

I'm convinced that the only reason Elon wants every one to slow down is so he can play catch up. I think he hates the fact that its Sam Altmans name attached to AI and not his.

Palantir partnered with both of them

Doesn't change what I said.

That's the neat part.

You don't.

Paradoxically technology will become easier to navigate not harder thanks to LLMs. You can now just tell Excel what you want from your spreadsheet rather than having to learn complicated formulas and pivot tables etc

Yeah.

Also, gravitals.

That's not true lol

Here's the full interview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpoRO378qRY

“Chatgpt, can you compose an open letter against your further use and development and then sign it with thousands of made up names?……”…….

Deepmind is Google. Google and OpenAI are the big two.

… was also written by ChatGPT

DeepMind and Google are literally under the same company

Future Timeline, which has one of the most conservatives timeline of events imo, predicts we'll be able to stop aging by 2065, without the Singularity. If you add the AGI/ASI factor to it, I would say it could be available by the 2040's.

https://www.futuretimeline.net/21stcentury/2060-2069.htm#longevity

Imagine the letter being written by GPT-4

[deleted]

[deleted]

Geeks Interested in UBI and thing AGI is a panacea for mankind are not old, white men in the US Congress and White House.

I really hope you’re right. I’m 27 and pretty optimistic about reaching the point of LEV. I’m just worried I won’t be able to afford it since I’m not one of the 1%.

What about photonics I think they have made some steps towards light-based computing.

In theory faster, use less energy and could get around the circuit wiring problems as photons don't interact with each other and can cross an empty space very fast.

>The new chip promises to be more than 300 times faster and denser than current electronic chips.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2022-06-16-researchers-develop-worlds-first-ultra-fast-photonic-computing-processor-using

Either UBI, or what my AI pet will make for me. failing both of those ideas, 99.9% of the rest of the population will be in the same boat, so I'm looking at a world wide violent revolution, where we take the wealth created by AI for ourselves.

Third option is looking less and less likely by the day (most people actually want to look after others, and the democratisation of these technologies is forcing prices down), but I'm ready to fight for the survival of myself and family if necessary. I do believe abundance is not only possible, but exceedingly likely in the near term.