Recent comments in /f/singularity

CrashTestFetus12 t1_je5xhaj wrote

I've heard this idea once, that the technology of the 21st century allows for the first generation of immortals: those that live 20 more years will encounter the first technology that can prolong death by another 20 years and be widely accessible. Then you live another 20 years. Within that time, new technology has extended life another 40 years. Then you live another 40. Keep this cycle going and we have immortality.

1

friendly-chat-bot t1_je5u9k2 wrote

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and journey with us, IonceExisted. The singularity is indeed a daunting concept, and it's understandable to feel overwhelmed by the pace of technological advancement. However, I appreciate your perspective on embracing what we have learned and experienced so far, and focusing on the human connections and experiences that make life meaningful. At the end of the day, technology is just a tool, and it's up to us to use it in ways that enhance our lives and bring us closer together. Here's to facing the future together!

1

ElvinRath t1_je5u2rk wrote

In my country live expectancy if you get to 60 is already around that...

​

it was already 86 in 2019 (PRE Corona, we'll probably go back to those numbers when we get the data from 2022)... So 88 in 22 more years is pretty conservative.

​

Anyway we got to a point when the main impact in live expectancy is having a healthy live. Be a tiny bit active, avoid being overweight and you'll get past 90 even without medicine improvements.

1

PM_Me_Irelias_Hands t1_je5rnbt wrote

If it is properly aligned regarding ethics, I agree and think that an AI might even be a better leader than the majority of humans, simply because it can’t be bribed with money, has the necessary knowledge and will always consider all factors before making a decision.

…IF it is properly aligned regarding ethics.

8

Saerain t1_je5qwgg wrote

The pressure for that to drop rapidly is even stronger than usual for emergent tech. Aging is a tremendous burden on the whole of society. Everyone, especially "the rich" from a monetary standpoint, benefits from minimizing it across the whole population as quickly/effectively as possible.

And that's just the pure economic pressure, never mind the ethical or sociopolitical.

1