Recent comments in /f/singularity
HarbingerDe t1_je67fzu wrote
Reply to comment by ShadowRazz in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
It is, because capitalism will find a way to destroy all of us first. It's actually well on track to do just that.
nofiss t1_je678l7 wrote
Interested, hit me up
acutelychronicpanic t1_je675wf wrote
I'd be very interested.
stoink t1_je674vu wrote
Reply to comment by Takadeshi in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
In Belgium there also complaining were getting closer to the singularity that's clear. The chaos is just getting started
Puzzleheaded-Owl1695 t1_je66xh4 wrote
Reply to comment by Puzzleheaded-Owl1695 in We are opening a Reading Club for ML papers. Who wants to join? š by __god_bless_you_
Also Great Initiative instead of just swiping reels and wasting time on social media people can make some real good friends with great minds too š
Puzzleheaded_Pop_743 t1_je66vh6 wrote
Reply to comment by choptic in Anyone else feel like everything else is meaningless except working towards AGI? by PixelEnjoyer
I am gathering from your reply that you believe meaning to be an objective function related to economic utility. Is this true?
Puzzleheaded-Owl1695 t1_je66sa4 wrote
Count me in brother but hope it isn't necessary to join session all the time because we never know when some urgent house or ofc work comes up, if it's fine by you count me in āļø
naum547 t1_je66s75 wrote
It probably won't, and hopefully with enough time jobs would be obsolete, but the period in between could be problematic.
PlanetExperience t1_je66rl5 wrote
Another hobbyist who would consider it an honor to hear the thoughts of technical professionals regarding the subject.
FpRhGf t1_je66lmv wrote
Reply to comment by Pro_RazE in How do i catch up with everything that is going on in A.I. Field? by Comfortable-Act9400
I want account suggestions please c:
iJeff t1_je66e93 wrote
Reply to comment by apinanaivot in ChatGPT browsing mode plugin now available to certain users. by Savings-Juice-9517
I suspect they just don't have enough capacity yet. As it is, I find the responses a bit slow whenever it needs to access the internet. Combine that with the slow GPT-4 response times largely due to congestion and 25 messages per 3 hours limit and it wouldn't be a great experience.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_je6667h wrote
Reply to The Limits of ASI: Can We Achieve Fusion, FDVR, and Consciousness Uploading? by submarine-observer
Fusion and Full Dive just need some number crunching. Don't know about consciousness boogeyman.
KGL-DIRECT t1_je65xrw wrote
Kill switch operator. Luddite repeller.
Saerain t1_je65wah wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
I mean, it's been improving for billions of humans for centuries, and stands to accelerate even more with all the downstream effects of eliminating aging.
Are you thinking mostly that the decline in population growth may reverse? From the traffic remark that's what I'm assuming.
Don't think that's very clearly true, though. Birth rates have been so strongly correlated with death rates over time... There's a lag in birth rates catching up when death rates drop, as we've seen in the African nations booming for instance, but catch up they do. Faster with higher standards of living.
singsix t1_je65q79 wrote
Reply to comment by Dyeeguy in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
Sign me up! Them filthy peasants! That's what they get for being hungry and wanting a future. Oh wait am I one too? Well... lads. When one person is not free then none of us are!
zeychelles t1_je65nuy wrote
May I join even tho Iām incredibly stupid and Iām just a hobbyist? Iād love to listen!
CrelbowMannschaft t1_je65ctf wrote
Reply to comment by MichaelsSocks in Would it be a good idea for AI to govern society? by JamPixD
> How do you definitively know this?
Do you know what the word "probably" means?
>Because for 200,000 years we have been the rulers of Earth, we've been the top dog. When ASI is achieved, that's no longer the case. We will be governed by a higher power and a much superior intelligence. Human civilization will never be the same.
Agreed. We have been inventing God as far back as we can know about. We're just finally getting serious about actually bringing it into existence, and finally submitting to it.
MichaelsSocks t1_je6537v wrote
Reply to comment by CrelbowMannschaft in Would it be a good idea for AI to govern society? by JamPixD
> In fact, dramatically reducing our numbers is probably a necessary step in preserving us.
How do you definitively know this? As I said, our knowledge is incredibly limited. An ASI may discover this idea to be false.
> We are an inherently self-destructive species. For my part, I refuse to reproduce.
Because for 200,000 years we have been the rulers of Earth, we've been the top dog. When ASI is achieved, that's no longer the case. We will be governed by a higher power and a much superior intelligence. Human civilization will never be the same.
ecoflip t1_je64yzl wrote
Would love to join!
Stakbrok t1_je64yoi wrote
Reply to comment by bria9509 in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Nope, it was actually the famous writer Edgar Allan Poe.
DollarStoreMikeBurry t1_je64rru wrote
yeah I would definitely be down! i've been thinking about starting something like this myself too, looks like you guys beat me to it lol
JessieThorne t1_je64pvy wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Plot twist: Gpt4 made the fake signatures to discredit the people behind the list :O
EnigmaticHam t1_je64lf7 wrote
Cool, most of my experience is in training custom image classification models and deploying on Azure. I would love to listen in.
CrelbowMannschaft t1_je64h7o wrote
Reply to comment by MichaelsSocks in Would it be a good idea for AI to govern society? by JamPixD
We can preserve humanity while dramatically reducing our numbers. In fact, dramatically reducing our numbers is probably a necessary step in preserving us. We are an inherently self-destructive species. For my part, I refuse to reproduce.
yo_yo_dude001 t1_je67i4d wrote
Reply to If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
From the moment i understood the weakness of my flesh.
It disgusted me.