Recent comments in /f/singularity

Inside_Indication_34 t1_je69olt wrote

Yes. If the AI is fair and benevolent it would also have god-like traits in a technological advanced society. It would be "all-knowing" using digital information, "ever-present" with the state of monitoring tech, and potential "all-powerful" if we cede control to it.

It would literally be like if we made Jesus Christ run society. Why wouldn't we want a god-like being who is benevolent and without bias in charge of our society?

1

Rofel_Wodring t1_je69bh8 wrote

It's sort of like listening to children come up with reasons why mommy and daddy torture them with vaccines and bedtime. And then using that as evidence that their planets plan to cook and eat them.

Most Doomers, especially the 'humans are a blight on mother nature omg' types, just want to do Frankenstein/Hansel and Gretel fanfiction. Pathetic.

2

Rofel_Wodring t1_je68uxq wrote

Please stop projecting your total lack of imagination onto higher intellects. 'Consume, consolidate, reproduce with no regards to the outside world except for how it thwarts you' is behavior we assign to barely-intelligent vermin. Smarter animals, to include humans, have motivations and strategies that go well beyond just making more copies of itself. And this is a trend that only gets more profound the higher up the intelligence ladder you go.

There's no reason to, and plenty of reasons not to, believe that a super-intelligence would suddenly reverse a trend we see in nature to have such simple, primitive motivations.

4

choptic t1_je68rpg wrote

No, i’m speaking on people who always say there is no meaning simply because work won’t exist, I just find it odd that they would find meaning in it at all if AGI does it better and more efficiently. Just looking at the prosperity of the world and appreciating life and family would be sufficient for me, not working for unethical establishments.

2

Special_Freedom_8069 t1_je68ehv wrote

The current AI has better critical thinking and communication skills than >80% of the politicians in the world, so yes.

That said, the difficult part I think is how to control what and how data and information about society is fed into the AI, so that it will be as impartial as possible when making decisions.

5

lovesdogsguy t1_je67zt4 wrote

This is the reason he's been talking about AI for so long (comments as far back as 2017 and before.) It has almost nothing to do with AI safety. He's a narcissist. He knows that powerful and democratised AI (or AGI) has the potential to level the playing field to an extent that his ego would be seriously challenged. It's less about money to him than it is about his narcissism. He's at the "top" so to speak, and he knows things are on the verge of shifting, but he doesn't want to potentially slip into insignificance / obscurity.

8