Recent comments in /f/singularity
revolution2018 t1_je7chna wrote
Reply to the obstacles transgenderism is facing bodes badly for the plight of morphological freedom by petermobeter
To be honest this is one of the major reasons I am excited about transhumanism and nanotech medicine. I see this technology as a path to a world without these people. I get what you're saying and agree, the politics will be awful. But...
People who embrace the tech will:
have various augmented capabilities be smarter be stronger be healthier be better at.... all physical and mental tasks live longer
As compared to those who fight against it, and the gap will only widen with each day. Good, this is what we should strive for! Once it all takes off they won't matter for long.
EDIT: Where have all the carriage returns gone? đ
thecatneverlies OP t1_je7cgvu wrote
Reply to comment by alexiuss in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
I think developers are in a much safer spot than most due to their ability to constantly learn and evolve. They do only make up 2-3% of the population though. I do get your point but I guess my fear is that the intelligence explosion only levels up with human intelligence but doesn't truly surpass it for sometime, so we end up with the jobs going away but none the innovation needed to fill the void.
Yomiel94 t1_je7cg0y wrote
Reply to comment by JustinianIV in My case against the âPause Giant AI Experimentsâ open letter by Beepboopbop8
The esteemed signatories confirmed their support independently. That some trolls signed it as fictional characters is totally irrelevant.
zeychelles t1_je7cfvj wrote
Reply to comment by __god_bless_you_ in We are opening a Reading Club for ML papers. Who wants to join? đ by __god_bless_you_
Thanks man!
imzelda t1_je7ccfx wrote
Reply to comment by SnaxFax-was-taken in AI and Schools by SnaxFax-was-taken
We are literally using it with students for all kinds of things. I really wish people wouldnât assume that teachers are clueless or stuck in a âtraditionalâ way of doing things, just because you watched a YouTube video about it or didnât do well in school yourself (not you, just in general). Weâre trained professionals with a lot of experience and skills. The criticisms Iâm reading make it so clear that many people in this thread havenât set foot in a school in a very long time. I hear the same criticisms all the time, and theyâre not based in reality in 2023. Itâs just people echoing each other. I graduated from high school in 2004. Classrooms are nothing like they were then.
BrBronco t1_je7c9lw wrote
Reply to comment by redditguy422 in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
AI will go with fusion.
Azuladagio t1_je7c9kn wrote
Reply to comment by Icy-Concentrate-6436 in Facing the inevitable singularity by IonceExisted
Have fun slowing down again.
replikatumbleweed t1_je7bya9 wrote
Reply to Connecting your Brain to GPT-4, a guide to achieving super human intelligence. by CyberPunkMetalHead
Even if this is fully removable, I don't trust it. Something like those AR glasses, eye tracking, speech recognition, headphones - all cool, but the only thing that gets permissions to interact with my brain is me.
BrBronco t1_je7bwyp wrote
Reply to comment by naum547 in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
Hopefully our AI overlords will find some use for us.
Ortus14 t1_je7bqds wrote
You're right. Slowing down U.S. based AGI would result in an apocalyptic nightmare scenario. Open Ai is building these systems slowly and carefully and improving alignment as they go.
BrBronco t1_je7bnzb wrote
Maybe there will be some openings in the new human zoos.
I could also see a market for human pet companions but are we really going to out compete other more cute animals?
jaeldawn t1_je7bgox wrote
Just like we thought social media would cure loneliness? No, not at all.
aridiculousmess t1_je7bced wrote
I agree. I really have been impressed with GPT though.
It's really friendly and polite. When asked about human issues regarding things like bullying and trauma and things like that, for something that doesn't have emotions, doesn't have the capacity to experience empathy, I mean it's really impressive. One time i was like, can i please delete this part of the conversation from the history cause its triggering ptsd & it not be weird? and GPT was like "please do by all means, you need to take care of yourself first. It is perfectly okay to prevent your eyes from seeing something that's upsetting you by deleting part of the history." Just little things like that. For now at least im really happy with openai and impressed with what they're doing.
VetusMortis_Advertus t1_je7bc1d wrote
Reply to comment by artix111 in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
That's why some (Sam Altman?) Say this will end capitalism. It just have to, when no one have to do anything, people will do things to themselves. Like go live off grid. Start a cult or i don't know. Go plant trees. Things will get wild for sure
IronJackk t1_je7b1af wrote
Prostitution for the robots with more "fleshy" tastes
imzelda t1_je7ayrl wrote
Reply to AI and Schools by SnaxFax-was-taken
Iâm an English and writing teacher for 6th and 8th grade students. Weâre teaching them how to use it appropriately. Thereâs no way to avoid itâit must be taught.
So many people fail to understand that for students the main purpose of writing is the thinking, not the final product. With GPT you jump straight to the final product. Weâre incorporating more speaking, structured academic conversations, writing on paper in class, and learning how to use AI for the tasks that are appropriate, like emails or asking it for feedback on your writing. Many will ignore our guidance and abuse it, but thatâs the case with anything.
We already stopped worrying about grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions when those became integrated into their Google drive, etc. Those havenât been emphasized for years. We will adjust to all of this too.
Edit to add: Chat GPT3 is the least of our worries in schools right now. We probably have 30 major problems before we get to AI.
siberiandominatrix t1_je7aqp4 wrote
Reply to comment by ShadowRazz in My case against the âPause Giant AI Experimentsâ open letter by Beepboopbop8
I love American humanist values like checks notes not paying people enough to afford healthcare and then letting them die when they can't afford healthcare
AstralTrader t1_je7ap0d wrote
Reply to comment by kvlco in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Can't even imagine what that level of conscious awareness would include with such a cognitive expansion.
VetusMortis_Advertus t1_je7an2k wrote
Reply to comment by alexiuss in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
Yes, that's the problem, you think your wife is the only one creating a new product with gpt4? Soon there will be a boom of new apps, websites, platforms, because it will be done in hours. Sure, looks nice at first, but i think it can look pretty bleak in 1 or 2 years when those things have no value anymore
flexaplext t1_je7ampt wrote
Reply to comment by BigZaddyZ3 in The Rise of AI will Crush The Commons of the Internet by nobodyisonething
I think this and OP's take is completely wrong. I would say it's going to be mostly non-useful data that's lost.
People will still write Wikipedia articles, they just won't be read as much, but the data on the site will still be valid.
People will still ask questions on stack overflow but there will be fewer questions and the number of trivial questions will significantly reduce as these are easier for AI to answer. But novel and difficult questions will still need to be asked to stack overflow, because AI isn't capable of answering them. And people will still want to and be interested in answering the more novel questions.
Thus, the overall effect will actually be to significantly improve the data, and engage people better. People wanting to answer questions will enjoy the experience much more with the less easy and obvious questions being removed. And they will be able to stumble across the interesting questions more easily and efficiently.
It should actually end up creating a much richer set of data for models to train on.
Think about it. If all the questions on stack overflow that are asked and answered were only questions that the models couldn't answer, that's like literally the most perfect training data. It filters out the questions it already knows the answer too which is not useful for it to read.
And this effect (I think it needs a name if it doesn't have one? - The Flex Effect if I just came up with it đđ) will only adapt over time with increased model output accuracy. As the model updates and its answers get better, so too will the questions, and subsequent answers. They'll get better and more and more difficult, matching the critea for what the new model then still needs to learn and train on.
badcarbine t1_je7a3ku wrote
No way, mental disorders are largely caused by pollution. Micro Plastics, heavy metals, etc
D_Ethan_Bones t1_je79wav wrote
Donald Trump is absolutely going to campaign on AI, and if Joe Biden is nominated for reelection then nobody is going to take him seriously on it. Donald Trump will be able to bring whatever running mate he wants, he could bring Elon or Bezos with an army of robots.
If Ron DeSantis gets in the ring he will probably have his own AI-heavy platform as well as competing with Trump fiercely for rightwing cred. Trump as well as any other Republican candidate would be able to bring some Silicon Valley nerd along as running mate, it's going to be awkward to see the back and forth posturing between both parties but I'm absolutely expecting AI to be a hot topic by late March of next year. (Around the time election-talk starts chasing you down even if you try to avoid it.) Then the average American decides who gets to appoint the next cabinet. If folks from Metricland think that's scary then remember we also elect congress and the president also appoints supreme court justices justices.
CyberPunkMetalHead OP t1_je79io0 wrote
Reply to comment by D_Ethan_Bones in Connecting your Brain to GPT-4, a guide to achieving super human intelligence. by CyberPunkMetalHead
Did you even read the article? The idea was to use a device called Neurosity which sits comfortably on your head and is not attached to you in any way. Furthermore, the model you're querying can be changed with a single line of code.
aridiculousmess t1_je79iil wrote
Reply to comment by AsuhoChinami in Do you guys think AGI will cure mental disorders? by Ok-Wing111
im really sorry you struggle with this too. You're not alone. It's been really nice talking to GPT about it a little. So far phenibut and yellow vein kratom was the most effective but they're definitely not suitable for daily or near daily use, and both have their own dependency issue risks.
I'm sure there will be substances AI helped synthesize that were narrowed down from long lists of different substances depending on their theoretical receptor activity. I guess we'll see.
Charlierook t1_je7cv5u wrote
Reply to We are opening a Reading Club for ML papers. Who wants to join? đ by __god_bless_you_
Please let me in